Psychiatric nurses’ thoughts and feelings about restraint use: a decision dilemma Patients continue to be physically restrained in psychiatric in‐patient units. Studies concerned with staff‐related variables have suggested that the emotional reactions of professionals to violent or potentially violent patients may influence their use of restrictive measures. However, no research existed that described psychiatric nurses’ thoughts and feelings while they were involved in restraint situations nor what effects their thoughts and feelings had on their decision to restrain. Therefore, an ethnographic qualitative study was conducted in order to describe systematically nurses’ thoughts and feelings toward restraint use in the in‐patient psychiatric setting. The conceptual approach guiding the study was Etzioni’s (1992) theoretical work on the role of normative‐affective factors in decision making. Following ethical approval of the study, ethnographic interviews were conducted with six nurses from an in‐patient psychiatric unit who had participated in a situation involving the physical restraint of a patient. The analysis of the nurses’ thoughts and feelings revealed that the restraint situation represented a decision dilemma for them. This overall finding was supported by four themes: (1) the framing of the situation: the potential for imminent harm; (2) the unsuccessful search for alternatives to physical restraints; (3) the conflicted nurse; and (4) the contextual conditions of restraint. The results indicated that restraint use is more complex than is currently conveyed in the literature in that normative‐affective factors influenced nurses’ restraint decisions. The findings advance our understanding of why restraints continue to be used in psychiatric units. Further research is necessary to examine the findings in other settings and with a larger and more diverse population in order to draw definitive conclusions about the continued use of physical restraints in the care of patients on psychiatric units in hospitals.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a walking/talking program on residents' communication, ambulation, and level of function when there were two residents to one care provider (2:1). A randomized control trial design was used. Subjects were residents with Alzheimer disease in three geriatric long-term care facilities in Metropolitan Toronto. Residents who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of three groups: walk-and-talk group (30 min, 5 times per week for 16 weeks, walking/talking in pairs), talk-only group (30 min, 5 times per week for 16 weeks, talk only in pairs), or no intervention. The outcome measures were the Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults, the 2-min walk test, and London Psychogeriatric Rating Scale. Residents who received the walk-and-talk intervention did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in the outcome variables measured posttest when compared with residents who received the talk-only intervention or no intervention, even after controlling for individual differences. Variability in the outcomes measured posttest is explained by differences in the residents' level of cognitive impairment before the study rather than by study group membership. These findings are contradictory to those of previous studies.

Specially designed outdoor spaces (SDOS) have been developed to improve the quality of life of people with dementia. However, few follow-up studies have been done to examine their use once implemented. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of how SDOS are used and the objectives of their design fulfilled. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted of a SDOS 3 years after it was built to answer the following questions: How has the garden changed from the original design? What are the current patterns of use of the garden? What factors facilitate use of the garden? What are the barriers to use of the garden? Four main sources of data were used: landscape architectural drawings, non-participant observation, focus groups, and in-depth interviews. The results lend support to the theoretical principles of garden design in the literature. The garden was considered an important part of the service program. However, factors such as garden maintenance, organizational support, staff training, and accessibility may limit its impact.

In this study, We addressed the problem of whether residents with a diagnosis of dementia would become agitated if given verbal commands at a level of language complexity above their comprehension ability. The study used an A-B-A research design. The convenience sample of 15 subjects was comprised of 11 men and 4 women who resided in a long-term care institution. Their mean age was 86.6 years, and their average length of stay in the institution was 317.3 days. The results lent support to the hypothesis that exposing residents with dementia to language beyond their comprehension ability could result in agitated behavior. The predominant manifestations of agitation were general restlessness, strange noises, and negativism. An important implication for nursing practice is that the language used by caregivers should match the comprehension ability of residents. Caregiving can thereby facilitate communication and, potentially, prevent agitation.