Background-We sought to identify preoperative predictors of clinical outcomes after surgery in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. Methods and Results-We prospectively enrolled 61 consecutive patients (54 women, aged 57Ϯ9 years) with isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing corrective surgery. Twenty-one patients (34%) were in New York Heart Association functional class II, 35 (57%) in class III, and 5 (9%) in class IV. Fifty-seven patients (93%) had previous history of left-sided valve surgery. Preoperative echocardiography revealed pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 41.5Ϯ8.7 mm Hg, right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic area of 35.1Ϯ9.0 cm

No abstract

consecutive patients presenting with ST were enrolled from 10 cardiovascular centers in Korea. They were compared with 2,192 controls (3,223 lesions) who had received percutaneous coronary intervention with at least 6 months of follow-up without ST. On multivariate analysis, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as initial diagnosis, drug-eluting stents (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR), low ejection fraction (EF), small stent diameter, left anterior descending artery intervention, and young age were independent predictors of total ST. When divided into early (ST within 30 days of index procedure) and delayed ST (ST after 30 days of index procedure), low EF, small stent diameter, DES ISR and AMI as initial diagnosis were universal risks for both early and delayed ST. The time from antiplatelet agent discontinuation to ST occurrence was significantly shorter in late compared with very late ST. Conclusions:Predictors of ST may be slightly different for early vs. delayed ST. However, low EF, small stent diameter, DES ISR lesion, and AMI as initial diagnosis were universal risk factors for both early and delayed ST cases. The relationship between antiplatelet agent discontinuation and ST occurrence seems stronger in late compared with very late ST. (Circ J 2011; 75: 1626 - 1632

No abstract

Background and ObjectivesThe prevalence of arthritis, which is often treated with celecoxib, is high in patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, celecoxib has been reported to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting by inhibiting expression of the proto-oncogene Akt. A concern is that celecoxib increases thrombogenicity by inhibiting the synthesis of prostacyclin in endothelial cells. However, it is not known whether the administration of celecoxib will attenuate the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel, which are used after stenting. We addressed this gap in our knowledge.Subjects and MethodsWe recruited healthy volunteers (n=40) and randomized them into five subgroups (n=8 for each group: aspirin, celecoxib, aspirin+celecoxib, aspirin+clopidogrel, and aspirin+clopidogrel+celecoxib). Each subject received their medications for 6 days and blood samples were taken on day 0 and day 7. Celecoxib (200 mg twice a day), and/or aspirin (100 mg daily), and/or clopidogrel (75 mg daily) were administered. We compared platelet function among subgroups using light transmittance aggregometry and arachidonic acid metabolite assays.ResultsCelecoxib treatment alone did not significantly affect platelet aggregation. The reduction in adenosine diphosphase (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation by aspirin+clopidogrel was not affected by addition of celecoxib (31.3±6.9% vs. 32.4±12.2%, p=0.83). Inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation by aspirin+clopidogrel was not affected by addition of celecoxib (47.6±13.4% vs. 51.6±3.7%, p=0.69). Drug-induced changes in prostacyclin and thromboxane levels did not differ among treatment groups.ConclusionCelecoxib treatment does not interfere with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin or clopidogrel, suggesting that celecoxib can be safely administered in combination with dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stenting without increased thrombogenicity.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The effect of celecoxib on restenosis after angioplasty with a Taxus stent (COREA-TAXUS) trial is an open-label randomized controlled study, where we reported celecoxib was effective in reducing 6months late loss of Taxus stent. With this cohort, we analyzed long-term clinical outcomes. Method: Two hundred sixty seven patients underwent successful paclitaxel-eluting stents implantation for native coronary lesions. Patients were randomized to receive celecoxib (400 mg before the intervention, and 200 mg twice daily for 6 months after the procedure) or not. Clinical endpoints were cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization of the target lesion. Results: At 6 months, frequency of adverse cardiac events was significantly lower in the celecoxib group (5.3% versus 16.2%, P=0.005), mainly because of reduced need for revascularization of the target lesion (5.3% versus 15.4%, P=0.009). Between 6 and 24 months, frequency of adverse cardiac events was not different between the celecoxib group and the control group (1.6% versus 4.4%, P=NS: 0% versus 0% for cardiac death; 0.8% versus 0.9% for non-fatal myocardial infarction; 0.8% versus 3.5% for revascularization of target lesion, P=all NS). At 2 years, frequency of adverse cardiac events was still significantly lower in the celecoxib group (6.9% versus 19.9%, P=0.002) Conclusion: In the COREA-TAXUS trial, the adjunctive use of celecoxib for 6 months after Taxus stent implantation was safe and clinically effective for 2 years.