2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61295-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of celecoxib on restenosis after coronary angioplasty with a Taxus stent (COREA-TAXUS trial): an open-label randomised controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding would not be expected if the relative risk were the same regardless of an individual's baseline risk and is consistent with a mechanism of risk that postulates a coxib-induced imbalance between thromboxane and prostacyclin, which would likely be most important under thrombogenic conditions. Because no available compelling data suggest that coxibs increase atherosclerotic burden-and recent evidence showing a reduction in restenosis rates after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients randomized to celecoxib 27 may suggest the opposite-potential imbalances between thromboxane and prostacyclin production would likely be most meaningful in a patient predisposed to pathological thrombus formation. Thus, patients with preexisting atherosclerotic plaque might be most susceptible to the risk imposed by coxibs, and in the presence of a plaque rupture, coxib use might increase the likelihood of sustained thrombosis.…”
Section: Solomon Et Al Trials Of Celecoxib and Cardiovascular Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding would not be expected if the relative risk were the same regardless of an individual's baseline risk and is consistent with a mechanism of risk that postulates a coxib-induced imbalance between thromboxane and prostacyclin, which would likely be most important under thrombogenic conditions. Because no available compelling data suggest that coxibs increase atherosclerotic burden-and recent evidence showing a reduction in restenosis rates after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients randomized to celecoxib 27 may suggest the opposite-potential imbalances between thromboxane and prostacyclin production would likely be most meaningful in a patient predisposed to pathological thrombus formation. Thus, patients with preexisting atherosclerotic plaque might be most susceptible to the risk imposed by coxibs, and in the presence of a plaque rupture, coxib use might increase the likelihood of sustained thrombosis.…”
Section: Solomon Et Al Trials Of Celecoxib and Cardiovascular Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Показано отсутствие увеличения сердечно-сосуди-стой смертности у больных воспалительными артритами при приеме НПВП [124, 125] и увеличение риска ИМ по-сле их отмены при РА, снижение частоты развития инт-раоперационного ИМ и рестеноза после реваскуляриза-ции сосудов на фоне приема целекоксиба [126], что дает основание рассматривать НПВП в качестве перспектив-ного средства профилактики атеросклероза при РА [124][125][126][127].…”
Section: противоревматическая терапияunclassified
“…9 On the basis of these novel findings, we have further demonstrated that adjunctive celecoxib treatment for 6 months after paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation in patients with complex coronary lesions reduces late luminal loss and need for target lesion revascularization at 6 months in the COREA-TAXUS randomized clinical trial ("Effect of Celecoxib On REstenosis after coronary Angioplasty with a TAXUS stent"). 10 However, caution for COX-2 inhibitors was raised when rofecoxib was voluntarily withdrawn from the market by its manufacturer after the Adenomatous Polyp Prevention On Vioxx study. 11 Since the publication of that study, there has been much controversy and intense debate whether there is an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events with celecoxib.…”
Section: Clinical Perspective On P 248mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed descriptions of the study protocol and procedure were previously reported. 10 Men and women were eligible if they were 18 to 75 years old, had angina pectoris or a positive stress test, and had native coronary lesions for which PES (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Mass) implantation was feasible. Complex lesions such as chronic total occlusion, long, calcified, type C, bifurcation, or small artery lesions were included because adjunctive medications to reduce restenosis is really needed for lesions with high restenosis rates.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%