SummaryUrokinase with an activity of 45,200 CTA nnits/mg was used in 0.4 mg amounts with Freund’s adjuvant to immunize four individual rabbits by two injections spaced 4 weeks apart. All antisera were titrated for inhibition of urokinase activation of plasminogen, for double diffusion in Agarose, and for immunoelectrophoresis. Against constant portions of 125I-labelled IgG from each antiserum, 131I-labelled urokinase was titrated by the quantitative precipitin technique. The results from these 4 methods of titration were compared and out of them the following conclusions were drawn :1. There were 3 main immunogens in the urokinase preparations, one inactive as an activator, one with questionable activity, and one definitely and strongly active as a urokinase. The first two comprised less than 5% of the total antigen mixture; the active third component was more than 20% of the total. About 75% of the total protein was non-precipitable with antibody and was inactive as an activator. One inactive immunogen, I, was a fast β-protein in immunoelectrophoresis at pH 8.2, ionic strength 0.05: the questionably active immunogen, II, was a γ-protein; the active third component, III, was a slow β-protein whose specific activity was estimated to be 230,000 CTA units/mg protein.2. Antibodies against I and II were in considerably higher titer than the ones to III and their equivalence points were reached at much higher concentrations of added urokinase preparation. A single precipitin line instead of 3 could be obtained by the use of very dilute antisera, but the line was due to the inactive I, not the slow active β-protein, III, nor the questionably active γ-protein, II.3. All 4 antisera were 100% inhibitory of plasminogen activation activity at the equivalence point of III, but were not inhibitory at the equivalence points of I and II.4. Urokinase when added to normal human serum could be visualized as easily in double diffusion as when tested in buffer alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.