No abstract

Pretreatment circulating NRP levels predict a low likelihood of benefit from HT, specifically DRO, in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive or receptor-unknown metastatic breast cancer, even when adjusted for other known predictive factors, such as ER and/or PgR levels, site of disease, disease-free interval from primary treatment to recurrence, and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. These data suggest that pretreatment NRP levels may be useful in deciding whether to treat a patient who otherwise appears to be likely to respond to HT.

Background: The extracellular domain of the HER-2/neu oncogene product is increased in sera of some patients with epithelial cancers. Our aim was to develop an automated serum assay for the extracellular domain of the HER-2/neu protein. Methods: We used a monoclonal antibody labeled with fluorescein for capture and a monoclonal Fab′ fragment labeled with alkaline phosphatase for detection. Separation of bound and free detection conjugate was performed with magnetizable particles coated with monoclonal antibody to fluorescein. Alkaline phosphatase activity was measured kinetically at 405 or 450 nm. Results: The assay was linear from 0.1 to 250 μg/L. No hook effect was evident up to 10 000 μg/L. Within-run imprecision (CV) was 0.8–1.2%, and total imprecision was 1.1–1.7%. Cross-reactivity with human epidermal growth factor receptor, which has extensive homology with HER-2/neu extracellular domain, was <0.6%. Human anti-mouse antibodies, heterophilic antibodies, and rheumatoid factor did not interfere, nor did the therapeutic monoclonal antibody Herceptin®. In 51 healthy females, the mean value was 9.3 μg/L with a range of 6.4–14.0 μg/L. No reagent lot-to-lot variability was detected over four lots of reagents tested. Conclusion: The Bayer Immuno 1TM assay for HER-2/neu was precise and resistant to interferences, characteristics that are essential for longitudinal monitoring of cancer patients.

Anti-p53 antibodies were examined in the plasma of 112 lung cancer patients by ELISA in order to study the distributions in lung cancer patients and the determinants of these antibodies in relation to lung cancer. Twenty (17.9 %) lung cancer patients were found to have anti-p53 antibodies. The distribution of the antibodies by histological type was 7/48 (14.6 %) adenocarcinoma, 8/32 (25.0 %) squamous cell carcinoma, 3/7 (42.9 %) small cell lung cancer, 0/4 large cell carcinoma, 0/8 adenosquamous cell carcinoma and 2/13 (15.4 %) other types. By ethnicity, 8/44 (18.2 %) Caucasians, 4/20 (20.0 %) Hispanics and 8/48 (16.7 %) African-Americans were positive for anti-p53 antibodies, with no significant differences among the groups (p=0.5137). The antibody positivity rates were higher in lung cancer patients 55 years or older (21.2 %) than in the patients under 55 years (7.4 %). The positive rates of the antibodies were 14.3 % in non-smokers, 16.7 % in ex-smokers and 19.1 % in current smokers, with heavy smokers (41 pack-years) having the highest positive rate (28.6 %), but none of these differences were statistically significant (p > 0.05). Seven controls who had anti-p53 antibodies were all ex-smokers or current smokers and some had occupational exposures. No anti-p53 antibodies were found in 41 non-smoking controls. These results suggest that the development of anti-p53 antibodies in pulmonary carcinogenesis and its association with smoking and other carcinogenic exposures deserve further study.