It appears that telmisartan may constitute a new therapeutic option in a stress-related cognitive impairment.

No abstract

RationaleDeleterious effects of psychological stress on memory are increasingly important. Overexpression of the AT1 angiotensin receptors in brain has been found to participate in several negative effects of chronic stress including hypertension and a cognitive impairment.ObjectiveIn this study, we searched for the protective effects the AT1 angiotensin receptor blockade with candesartan against the adverse effects of repeated stress on recall of aversively and appetitively motivated behaviours in rats.MethodsTwo groups of male Wistar rats were repeatedly stressed by keeping them daily (2 h/21 days) in tight plastic tubes. The subjects of the group 1 received candesartan (0.1 mg/kg, orally) each day before the stressing procedure. The rats of the group 2 received vehicle. Another two groups of rats (3 and 4) receiving candesartan and vehicle, respectively, were appropriately handled but not stressed. Next day, after ending the repeated stress procedure, all rats were tested in two cognitive paradigms: inhibitory avoidance (IA) and object recognition (OR).ResultsStressed animals displayed decreased recall of the IA behaviour (p < 0.01) and decreased OR (p < 0.05). These effects were not seen in the animals stressed and concomitantly treated with candesartan. The auxiliary tests designed to control for the possible unspecific contribution of motor (open field) and emotional (elevated “plus” maze) effects of the experimental procedures to results of the cognitive tests showed no such contribution.ConclusionThese data strongly suggest that the AT1 angiotensin receptor blockade effectively counteracts deleterious effects of stress on recall of aversively and appetitively motivated memories in rats.

Background Since fall 2019, SARS-CoV-2 spread world-wide, causing a major pandemic with estimated ~ 220 million subjects affected as of September 2021. Severe COVID-19 is associated with multiple organ failure, particularly of lung and kidney, but also grave neuropsychiatric manifestations. Overall mortality reaches > 2%. Vaccine development has thrived in thus far unreached dimensions and will be one prerequisite to terminate the pandemic. Despite intensive research, however, few treatment options for modifying COVID-19 course/outcome have emerged since the pandemic outbreak. Additionally, the substantial threat of serious downstream sequelae, called ‘long COVID’ and ‘neuroCOVID’, becomes increasingly evident. Main body of the abstract Among candidates that were suggested but did not yet receive appropriate funding for clinical trials is recombinant human erythropoietin. Based on accumulating experimental and clinical evidence, erythropoietin is expected to (1) improve respiration/organ function, (2) counteract overshooting inflammation, (3) act sustainably neuroprotective/neuroregenerative. Recent counterintuitive findings of decreased serum erythropoietin levels in severe COVID-19 not only support a relative deficiency of erythropoietin in this condition, which can be therapeutically addressed, but also made us coin the term ‘hypoxia paradox’. As we review here, this paradox is likely due to uncoupling of physiological hypoxia signaling circuits, mediated by detrimental gene products of SARS-CoV-2 or unfavorable host responses, including microRNAs or dysfunctional mitochondria. Substitution of erythropoietin might overcome this ‘hypoxia paradox’ caused by deranged signaling and improve survival/functional status of COVID-19 patients and their long-term outcome. As supporting hints, embedded in this review, we present 4 male patients with severe COVID-19 and unfavorable prognosis, including predicted high lethality, who all profoundly improved upon treatment which included erythropoietin analogues. Short conclusion Substitution of EPO may—among other beneficial EPO effects in severe COVID-19—circumvent downstream consequences of the ‘hypoxia paradox’. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial for proof-of-concept is warranted.

AT1 angiotensin receptor blockade attenuates negative effect of both acute and chronic stress on spatial memory.

STAT3 contributes to increase of EPO expression which is also HIF-1 dependent. EPO receptor activates STAT3. Expressions of STAT3 and hypoxia induced proteins: HIF-1, EPO and EPOR show mutual correlations in primary ductal breast cancers, which suggest co-operation among these proteins. Moreover, EPO-EPOR signaling was reported to mediate cell survival by targeting Bcl-xL in competition with Bax-dependent apoptosis. Our present study was focused on immunohistochemical evaluation of STAT3, HIF-1alpha, EPO and EPOR in relation to apoptosis regulators, Bax and Bcl-xL in 39 metastases of ductal breast cancers to lymph nodes. The proteins were abundantly expressed by cancer cells. HIF-1alpha correlated with EPOR in all and in chemotherapy treated metastases (r=0.428, p=0.007 and r=0.462, p=0.040, respectively). HIF-1 associated significantly with EPO in chemotherapy spared metastases (r=0.549, p=0.015) and comparison between those proteins almost reached statistical significance in entire number of metastatic breast cancers (r=0.309, p=0.056). Metastases from T2 primary tumors had significantly higher expressions of HIF-1alpha, EPO and EPOR compared to T1 originating metastases (p=0.020, p=0.028, p=0.021, respectively). Bax correlated with EPO and EPOR in all studied nodal metastases (r=0.449, p=0.006 and r=0.421, p=0.011, respectively) and so did Bcl-xL with HIF-1alpha (r=0.440, p=0.007), EPO and EPOR (r=0.383, p=0.021, r=0.495, p=0.002, respectively). Metastatic breast cancers seem to be areas of intensive signaling by STAT3, HIF-1, EPO and EPOR. Strong Bax and Bcl-xL labeling reflects accelerated cell turnover in nodal metastases. By means of association with Bcl-xL, HIF-1alpha, EPO and EPOR could favor growth of nodal metastases and survival of breast cancers cells.

Retreat in psychiatric drug development results in innovative medication decline that might be at least partially overcome by adjunct therapy. New evidence from clinical studies has shown a possible role for brain Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) in both affective and psychotic disorders. Simultaneously, rapidly accumulating data from basic studies indicate effectiveness of central RAS blockade in much broader range of neuropsychiatric disease. Recent findings implicate brain RAS, especially Angiotensin II (Ang II), in neural pathophysiology of mental disorders through neuroendocrine modulation and effects on neurotransmitter release, mostly noradrenaline, acetylcholine and dopamine. The potential effects of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockade on treatment of mental disorders are a matter of considerable interest. This review describes involvement of brain RAS in pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders and an intriguing possibilities of improvement in pharmacological treatment outcome, where using angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB), goes beyond blood pressure control.

No abstract