Background: Gap junctions are intercellular channels composed of connexins, which mediate the direct passage of small molecules between neighbouring cells. They are involved in regulation of cell cycle, cell signalling, and differentiation, and probably invasion and metastasis. The role of connexins in the metastatic process is controversial, because some studies indicate that connexin expression is inversely correlated with metastatic capacity. In contrast, others demonstrate that connexins may be involved in metastasis. In addition, connexin status in breast cancer metastasis has not been widely studied. Methods: We evaluated by immunohistochemistry the expression of connexin 26 (Cx26) and connexin 43 (Cx43) in primary breast tumours (PTs) and matched paired metastases to lymph nodes (MLNs). Results: In PTs, we observed predominantly cytoplasmic localisation of evaluated connexins, indicating alterations in connexin expression in breast cancer cells. We demonstrated that expression of Cx26 and Cx43 was increased in MLNs compared with PTs (p,0.00001 and p,0.001, for CX26 and Cx43, respectively). In addition, Cx26 and Cx43 negative PTs developed Cx26 and Cx43 positive MLNs. Furthermore, besides increased cytoplasmic staining, enhanced membranous localisation of Cx43, typical of normal cells, was found in MLNs. Additionally, membranous Cx26 expression appeared only in metastatic breast cancer cells. Conclusions: These findings suggest that connexins may contribute to the efficient metastasising of breast cancer to the lymph nodes.

Recent studies suggested that Ob (Ob) and its receptor (ObR) could be involved in the pathogenesis of various human malignancies, among others in endometrial cancer. Moreover, hypoxia, which is associated with solid tumors, might stimulate, through hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha), expression of Ob and ObR. In this article, we analyzed by immunohistochemistry the expression of Ob, ObR, and HIF-1alpha in 60 cases of human endometrial cancer tissues as well as in 25 cases of normal endometria. Additionally, we assessed correlations among studied proteins as well as relationships with selected clinicopathological features of endometrial cancer. Immunoreactivity for Ob, ObR, and HIF-1alpha protein was observed in 56.7%, 30.0%, and 78.3% of endometrial cancers, respectively. The expression of HIF-1alpha showed a significant positive correlation with Ob (P < 0.0001, r = 0.573) and ObR (P = 0.020, r = 0.299). Moreover, we noted positive correlation between Ob and ObR (P = 0.001, r = 0.429). No statistically significant relationship was revealed between Ob, ObR, and HIF-1alpha protein in regard to patient's age, histological grade, and extent of tumor growth (pT). In conclusion, HIF-1alpha, which is related to tissue hypoxia in endometrial cancer, seems to be associated with overexpression of Ob and ObR. Ob could exert autocrine effect to stimulate endometrial cancer progression. Thus the autocrine Ob loop should be taken into consideration as a novel potential target in endometrial cancer prevention and treatment.

Abstract. Periostin, also known as osteoblast-specific factor 2, is a cell-adhesion protein with pleiotropic properties. The protein serves a vital role in the maintenance and development of tooth and bone tissue, in addition to cardiac development and healing. Periostin levels are increased in several forms of cancer, including pancreatic, ovarian, colon, lung, breast, gastric, thyroid, and esophageal head and neck carcinomas. The present review highlights the key role of periostin in tumorigenesis, particularly in increasing cell survival, invasion, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of carcinoma cells by interacting with numerous cell-surface receptors, including integrins, in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt pathway. In addition, periostin actively affects the canonical Wnt signaling pathway of colorectal tumorigenesis. The current review focused on the involvement of periostin in the development of colorectal, esophageal and gastric cancer.

Leptin restricts intake of calories as a satiety hormone. It probably stimulates neoplastic proliferation in breast cancer, too. Growth of malignant cells could be regulated by various leptin-induced second messengers like STAT3 (signal transducers and activators of transcription 3), AP-1 (transcription activator protein 1), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and ERKs (extracellular signal-regulated kinases). They seem to be involved in aromatase expression, generation of estrogens and activation of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in malignant breast epithelium. Leptin may maintain resistance to antiestrogen therapy. Namely, it increased activation of estrogen receptors, therefore, it was suspected to reduce or even overcome the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on breast cell proliferation. Although several valuable reviews have been focused on the role of leptin in breast cancer, the status of knowledge in this field changes quickly and our insight should be continuously revised. In this summary, we provide refreshed interpretation of intensively reported scientific queries of the topic.

HIF-1alpha induces GLUT-1 expression, and their presence has been evaluated in colorectal cancer. However, the expressions of GLUT-1 and HIF-1alpha have not been investigated together with reference to clinicopathological characteristics in human colorectal cancer. The aim of our study was to compare the expression of HIF-1alpha and GLUT-1 with various clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer. The presence of HIF-1alpha and GLUT-1 was visualized immunohistochemically in 123 primary tumors. Membranous localization of GLUT-1 was found in multifocally necrotizing cancer samples, while pure cytoplasmic perinuclear, mostly supranuclear GLUT-1 accumulation was characteristic of cancer fields with lack of necrosis. HIF-1alpha was located in the cytoplasm and occasionally in the nuclei of cancer cells. Immunoreactivity to GLUT-1 was significantly higher in node-positive cancers compared with nodenegative ones (p=0.04), confirming our earlier results obtained on a larger number of patients. Non-mucinous adenocarcinomas expressed GLUT-1 and HIF-1alpha with significantly greater frequency than mucinous adenocarcinomas (p=0.002, p=0.0002, respectively). GLUT-1 and HIF-1alpha expression did not differ in relation to tumor stage, location, or patients' age or gender. In contrast to that of GLUT-1, expression of HIF-1alpha correlated with grade (p=0.00003) without difference with regard to pN status. HIF-1alpha expression correlated with GLUT-1 expression in the whole patient population, as well as in all clinicopathological groups except for the pT1+pT2 group. Although the coexpression of cytoplasmic HIF-1alpha and GLUT-1 does not directly prove the dependence between HIF-1 as a nuclear transcriptional factor and GLUT-1 as its downstream protein, it is evidence of their simultaneous upregulation. The extranuclear accumulation of HIF-1alpha and GLUT-1 requires further studies to explain its significance in colorectal cancer.