No abstract

No abstract

The production of wood pellets has grown considerably in the last decades. Besides woody biomass, other feedstocks can be used for pellet production. Among these, miscanthus presents some advantages because, even if specifically cultivated, it requires low inputs such as fertilisers and pesticides and shows high biomass yield (up to 28 tons of dry matter ha−1 in Europe). Even if in the last years some studies evaluated the environmental impact of woody pellet production, there is no information about the environmental performances of miscanthus pellet production. In this study, the environmental impact of miscanthus pellet was evaluated using the Life Cycle Assessment approach with a cradle-to plant gate perspective. Primary data were collected in a small-medium size pelletizing plant located in Northern Italy where miscanthus is cultivated to be directly processed. The results highlight how the miscanthus pellet shows lower environmental impact compared to woody pellet, mainly due to the lower energy consumption during pelletizing. The possibility to pelletize the miscanthus biomass without any drying offsets the environmental impact related to the miscanthus cultivation for all the evaluated impact categories (except for Marine eutrophication). In detail, for global warming potential, 1 ton of miscanthus pellet shows an impact of 121.6 kg CO2 eq. (about 8% lower respect to woody pellet) while for the other evaluated impact categories the impact reduction ranges from 4 to 59%. Harvesting, which unlike the other field operations is carried out every year, is by far the main contributor to the impacts of the cultivation phase while electricity is the main contributor to the pelletizing phase.

No abstract

To protect the driver in case of a tractor overturn, narrow-track tractors (used in vineyards and orchards) can be equipped with a rollover protective structure (ROPS) consisting of a two-pillar front-mounted foldable rollbar. The transition from the horizontal (rest) to the vertical (protection) position of this ROPS is performed manually by the driver. In addition to the time spent performing this task many times each day, a moderate physical load is required, given that these rollbars often have a mass of some tens of kilograms. In practice, neglect and poor attention to safety lead to the foldable rollbar remaining continuously in the rest position rather than being moved to the vertical (protection) position. Several rollover accidents have been fatal for the driver because the tractor, although equipped with a two-pillar front-mounted ROPS, had the rollbar in the horizontal position at the time of the event, thus assuring no protection to the driver. This issue is quite serious. To remove at least one of the problems for the proper management of this type of ROPS, the OECD has recently updated its Code 6 by introducing an optional test addressing the manual handling of front-mounted rollbars, providing a maximum load of 100 N. Several tests were conducted on new rollbars to ascertain the accuracy of this limit. The 100 N value was generally exceeded, which is cause for criticism. Indeed, a more appropriate reference for manual handling in this case would be the higher loads (up to 250 N) already provided by other standards for non-continuous tasks.

No abstract

In Italy, about 160 fatal accidents per year have occurred recently in agriculture, most of them involving agricultural machinery. The most frequent cause of fatal events is the tractor overturning. One of the opportunities to monitor the trend of agricultural tractors fatal overturning is a meticulous search for information on the numerous web portals, at national and local level. In fact, in their information purposes are also included the recording, practically in real time, of significant details about each fatal event, such as the place of the accident, the year, the month and the day of the week of occurring, the victim’s age, gender and nationality, etc. This article is describing the results of the monitoring of fatal tractor overturning accidents in the period of 2008–2019 in Italy. In the 12 years of the survey, 1414 fatal accidents were recorded, most of them occurring in the spring and summer months. The region with the highest cumulative number of fatal events was Tuscany (143). The majority (58.8%) of the victims were over 60, while 71.4% of accidents occurred during field work. Most (57.6%) of the tractors involved in the fatal events did not have rollover protective structures (ROPS), while 19.4% were equipped with a two-post foldable front roll-bar, which, however, was in the lowered position at the time of the accident. In most cases, the tractors involved were obsolete and in poor maintenance conditions, and did not comply with general and specific laws on work safety. To improve the situation, the introduction of the tractor training certificate for the drivers and the periodical inspection for tractors, as well as the issuing of significant financial supports to encourage the replacement of the old models with modern more safe models, are the most effective actions to be put into practice.

The whole-body vibration transmitted through the seat of a 4WD modern tractor of 81 kW max power, equipped with seat, cab and front axle suspension systems were measured and analysed according to the official relevant Standards. The test conditions involved the travelling speed (from 1.11 to 4.44 m s -1 ), the surface feature (field and rough track), the type of task (tractor alone and coupled with a towed slurry tank) and the front axle suspension condition (working or locked). After their statistical validation, the results highlight a good efficiency of the front axle suspension in reducing the vibration levels of the tractor alone, while when coupled with the slurry tank the benefit is less evident, especially in the back-front direction. The lower limit provided by the 2002/44 EC Directive ("action value", 0.5 m s -2 ) is generally exceeded in all the three axes, apart when travelling at the lowest speed. 1312 Davide M. Giordano et al.Vice versa, the vibration levels exceed the higher limit ("limit value", 1.0 m s -2 ) only if the overall RMS values are considered, in the field at 2.22 m s -1 and on the rough track at 4.44 m s -1 .