IMPORTANCE Allergic reactions among some individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine discourage patients with allergic conditions from receiving this vaccine and physicians from recommending the vaccine.OBJECTIVE To describe the assessment and immunization of highly allergic individuals with the BNT162b2 vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn a prospective cohort study from December 27, 2020, to February 22, 2021, 8102 patients with allergies who applied to the COVID 19 vaccine referral center at the Sheba Medical Center underwent risk assessment using an algorithm that included a detailed questionnaire. High-risk patients (n = 429) were considered "highly allergic" and were immunized under medical supervision. EXPOSURES Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESAllergic and anaphylactic reactions after the first and second doses of BNT162b2 vaccine among highly allergic patients. RESULTSOf the 429 individuals who applied to the COVID-19 referral center and were defined as highly allergic, 304 (70.9%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 52 ( 16) years. This highly allergic group was referred to receive immunization under medical supervision. After the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, 420 patients (97.9%) had no immediate allergic event, 6 (1.4%) developed minor allergic responses, and 3 (0.7%) had anaphylactic reactions. During the study period, 218 highly allergic patients (50.8%) received the second BNT162b2 vaccine dose, of which 214 (98.2%) had no allergic reactions and 4 patients (1.8%) had minor allergic reactions. Other immediate and late reactions were comparable with those seen in the general population, except for delayed itch and skin eruption, which were more common among allergic patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe rate of allergic reactions to BNT162b2 vaccine, is higher among patients with allergies, particularly among a subgroup with a history of high-risk allergies. This study suggests that most patients with a history of allergic diseases and, particularly, highly allergic patients can be safely immunized by using an algorithm that can be implemented in different medical facilities and includes a referral center, a risk assessment questionnaire, and a setting for immunization under medical supervision of highly allergic patients. Further studies are required to define more specific risk factors for allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Innate immunity is one of two immune defence system arms. It is present at birth and does not require ‘learning’ through exposure to foreign organisms. It activates various mechanisms collectively to eliminate pathogens and hold an infection until the adaptive response are mounted. The innate immune system consists of four elements: the epithelial barrier, cells (e.g. macrophages, NK cells), plasma proteins (e.g. complement) and cytokines. These components act in concert to induce complex processes, as well as recruitment, activation and differentiation of adaptive responses. The innate response is more than just the ‘first line of defence’, as it essentially withholds the vast majority of any intruder, has a complex interplay with the adaptive arm and is crucial for survival of the host. Finally, yet importantly, a myriad of diseases has been linked with innate immune dysregulation. In this mini-review we will shed some light on these conditions, particularly regarding autoinflammatory ones.

Background: Most children with egg allergy (EA) can tolerate extensively heated and baked egg (EHBE). Consumption of EHBE may promote faster resolution of EA; however, no consensus exists as to the required amounts and treatment protocols.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a structured graduated exposure protocol (SGEP) with EHBE in promoting tolerance to eggs in EA children under 2 years of age. Methods:In a case-control study, EA children aged < 2 years who were treated with SGEP including EHBE were compared to children treated with strict avoidance. Data were collected from records and telephone questionnaires. Analysis was performed using non-parametric Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression models.Results: Thirty-nine egg-allergic children with a median age at intervention of 16 months (interquartile range: 13-19) were treated with SGEP and followed to a median age of 39 months (26.8-50.0). The median age at resolution of EA was compared to a matched group of 80 children treated with strict avoidance at least until 2 years of age or earlier natural resolution and followed to a median age of 69 months (46-104).The median estimated age at EA resolution in the SGEP group was 24 months (95% CI, 19.5-28.5 months), compared to 78 months (95% CI, 53-102) in the control group, P < .001. At last follow-up, 82% of treated children were tolerant to lightly cooked eggs vs 54% of controls, P = .001. Conclusion:A structured protocol with EHBE appears to promote faster resolution of EA. K E Y W O R D Satopic dermatitis, egg allergy, food allergy, heat denatured proteins, structured graduated protocol, wheezing | 825 GOTESDYNER ET al.