Transcription factor NRF2 is an important modifier of cellular responses to oxidative stress. Although its cytoprotective effects are firmly established, recent evidence suggesting important roles in cancer pathobiology has yet to be mechanistically developed. In the current study, we investigated the role of NRF2 in colon tumor angiogenesis. Stable RNAi-mediated knockdown of NRF2 in human colon cancer cells suppressed tumor growth in mouse xenograft settings with a concomitant reduction in blood vessel formation and VEGF expression. Similar antiangiogenic effects of NRF2 knockdown were documented in chick chorioallantoic membrane assays and endothelial tube formation assays. Notably, NRF2-inhibited cancer cells failed to accumulate HIF-1a protein under hypoxic conditions, limiting expression of VEGF and other HIF-1a target genes. In these cells, HIF-1a was hydroxylated but pharmacological inhibition of PHD domain-containing prolyl hydroxylases was sufficient to restore hypoxia-induced accumulation of HIF-1a. Mechanistic investigations demonstrated that reduced mitochondrial O 2 consumption in NRF2-inhibited cells was probably responsible for HIF-1a degradation during hypoxia; cellular O 2 consumption and ATP production were lower in NRF2 knockdown cells than in control cells. Our findings offer novel insights into how cellular responses to O 2 and oxidative stress are integrated in cancer cells, and they highlight NRF2 as a candidate molecular target to control tumor angiogenesis by imposing a blockade to HIF-1a signaling. Cancer Res; 71(6); 2260-75. Ó2011 AACR.

The human intestinal commensal microbiota and associated metabolic products have long been regarded as contributors to host health. As the identity and activities of the various members of this community have become clearer, newly identified health-associated bacteria, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila, Ruminococcus bromii and Roseburia species, have emerged. Notably, the abundance of many of these bacteria is inversely correlated to several disease states. While technological and regulatory hurdles may limit the use of strains from these taxa as probiotics, it should be possible to utilize prebiotics and other dietary components to selectively enhance their growth in situ. Dietary components of potential relevance include wellestablished prebiotics, such as galacto-oligosaccharides, fructo-oligosaccharides and inulin, while other putative prebiotics, such as other oligosaccharides, polyphenols, resistant starch, algae and seaweed as well as host gut metabolites such as lactate and acetate, may also be applied with the aim of selectively and/or differentially affecting the beneficial bacterial community within the gastrointestinal environment. The present review provides an overview of the dietary components that could be applied in this manner. ARTICLE HISTORY

The microbiota of the intestinal tract plays an important role in colonic health, mediating many effects of dietary components on colonic health and during enteric infections. In the context of the increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance in gut bacteria, complementary therapies are required for the prevention and treatment of enteric infections. Here we report the potential application of essential oils (EO) and pure EO compounds to improve human gut health. Nerolidol, thymol, eugenol and geraniol inhibited growth of the pathogens Escherichia coli O157 : H7(VT " ), Clostridium difficile DSM1296, Clostridium perfringens DSM11780, Salmonella typhimurium 3530 and Salmonella enteritidis S1400 at a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) varying from 50 to 500 p.p.m. Most EO showed greater toxicity to pathogens than to commensals. However, the beneficial commensal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was sensitive to EO at similar or even lower concentrations than the pathogens. The EO showed dose-dependent effects on cell integrity, as measured using propidium iodide, of Gram-positive bacteria. These effects were not strongly correlated with growth inhibition, however, suggesting that cell membrane damage occurred but was not the primary cause of growth inhibition. Growth inhibition of Gram-negative bacteria, in contrast, occurred mostly without cell integrity loss. Principal component analysis showed clustering of responses according to bacterial species rather than to the identity of the EO, with the exception that responses to thymol and nerolidol clustered away from the other EO. In conclusion, the selective effects of some EO might have beneficial effects on gut health if chosen carefully for effectiveness against different species.