No abstract

Objective: Despite being a major cause of neurological disability, the neural mechanisms of functional movement disorders (FMDs) remain poorly understood. Recent studies suggest that FMD is linked to dysfunctional motor and prefrontal regions that could lead to motor and cognitive impairments. The aim of this study was to investigate different components of action control in FMD by using choicereaction, stop-signal, and Simon tasks.Methods: Thirty patients with an FMD were prospectively recruited from the University of Louisville Movement Disorders Clinic and compared with 53 healthy control subjects, recruited from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Movement Disorders Clinic. FMD motor symptom severity was rated with the Simplified Functional Movement Disorder Rating Scale (S-FMDRS). By using a computer and handheld response grips, participants completed three action-control tasks (choice-reaction task, stop-signal task, and Simon task) that tested action initiation, action cancelation, and interference control over actions. Action-control measures were compared between groups with analyses of variance.Results: Patients with FMD were less proficient in suppressing incorrect response impulses on the Simon task and were slower to stop on the stop-signal task compared with healthy control subjects. No significant correlation with neuropsychological measurements, S-FMDRS scores, and action-control measurements was observed.Conclusions: These results suggest that two forms of inhibitory control, selective impulse inhibition and global action cancelation, are impaired in patients with FMD, independent of slowing on go reaction times. Improved understanding of action control in FMD may help in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

No abstract

Background: The coronavirus pandemic saw technology evolve as outpatient clinics faced restriction of in-person visits. Reliance on telemedicine using two-way audio-video communication significantly increased. Telemedicine was observed to be convenient, cost-effective, reduced no-show rates, and fostered sustained engagement. Enhanced flexibility from short notice scheduling benefitted patients and their caregivers. Greater time value was perceived by patients, and reduced reliance on caregivers. Disadvantages included barriers of access to internet connectivity or equipment. Objective: We aimed to retrospectively survey patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) seen via telehealth in our HDSA Center for Excellence Multidisciplinary clinic. We evaluated usability, learnability, interface quality, reliability, and future use. Methods: This qualitative survey used the 21-item Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. Close-ended responses ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree scored on Likert scale (1 through 7). Averages were calculated to examine attitudes towards telemedicine. Spearman correlation test was performed to detect attitude biases between patients and caregivers. Results: Respondents were more likely than not to strongly agree with survey statements. Average attitude score of 5.92 (range 2.95-7.00) suggested favorability and improved convenience when telehealth was used in complement to in-person visits, without detriment to patient-provider communication. Spearman correlation coefficient between patient and family/caregiver groups was 0.023, which is below the cutoff of 0.344 for a = 0.05 at N = 24. This suggests there was no bias between patient and caregiver attitudes. Conclusion: This study demonstrated telehealth is favored by caregivers and patients with HD. This population with specific physical, cognitive and psychiatric needs can benefit from adaptive systems that enhance compliance.