Background The current diagnostic delay of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after pulmonary embolism (PE) is unacceptably long, causing loss of quality-adjusted life years and excess mortality. Validated screening strategies for early CTEPH diagnosis are lacking. Echocardiographic screening among all PE survivors is associated with overdiagnosis and cost-ineffectiveness. We aimed to validate a simple screening strategy for excluding CTEPH early after acute PE, limiting the number of performed echocardiograms. Methods In this prospective, international, multicentre management study, consecutive patients were managed according to a screening algorithm starting 3 months after acute PE to determine whether echocardiographic evaluation of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was indicated. If the ‘CTEPH prediction score’ indicated high pretest probability or matching symptoms were present, the ‘CTEPH rule-out criteria’ were applied, consisting of ECG reading and N-terminalpro-brain natriuretic peptide. Only if these results could not rule out possible PH, the patients were referred for echocardiography. Results 424 patients were included. Based on the algorithm, CTEPH was considered absent in 343 (81%) patients, leaving 81 patients (19%) referred for echocardiography. During 2-year follow-up, one patient in whom echocardiography was deemed unnecessary by the algorithm was diagnosed with CTEPH, reflecting an algorithm failure rate of 0.29% (95% CI 0% to 1.6%). Overall CTEPH incidence was 3.1% (13/424), of whom 10 patients were diagnosed within 4 months after the PE presentation. Conclusions The InShape II algorithm accurately excluded CTEPH, without the need for echocardiography in the overall majority of patients. CTEPH was identified early after acute PE, resulting in a substantially shorter diagnostic delay than in current practice.
Background: Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and compliance are comparable in proximal and distal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, proximal CTEPH is associated with inferior right ventricular (RV) adaptation. Early wave reflection in proximal CTEPH may be responsible for altered RV function. The aims of the study are 1) investigate whether reflected pressure returns sooner in proximal than in distal CTEPH, and 2) elucidate whether timing of reflected pressure is related to RV dimensions, ejection fraction (RVEF), hypertrophy and wall stress. Methods: Right heart catheterization and cardiac MRI were performed in 17 patients with proximal and 17 patients with distal CTEPH. In addition to determination of PVR, compliance and characteristic impedance, wave separation analysis was performed to determine the magnitude and timing of the peak reflected pressure (as % of systole). Findings were related to RV dimensions and time-resolved RV wall stress. Results: Proximal CTEPH was characterized by higher RV volumes, mass and wall stress, and lower RVEF. While PVR, compliance and characteristic impedance were similar, proximal CTEPH was related to an earlier return of reflected pressure than distal CTEPH (proximal 53±8% vs. distal 63±15%, P<0.05). The magnitude of the reflected pressure waves did not differ. RV volumes, RVEF, RV mass and wall stress were all related to the timing of peak reflected pressure. Conclusions: Poor RV function in patients with proximal CTEPH is related to an early return of reflected pressure wave. PVR, compliance and characteristic impedance do not explain differences in RV function between proximal and distal CTEPH.
AimHaemodynamic normalisation is the ultimate goal of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, whether normalisation of haemodynamics translates into normalisation of exercise capacity is unknown. The incidence, determinants and clinical implications of exercise intolerance after PEA are unknown. We performed a prospective analysis to determine the incidence of exercise intolerance after PEA, assess the relationship between exercise capacity and (resting) haemodynamics and search for preoperative predictors of exercise intolerance after PEA.MethodsAccording to clinical protocol all patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), right heart catheterisation and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging before and 6 months after PEA. Exercise intolerance was defined as a peak oxygen consumption (V′O2) <80% predicted. CPET parameters were judged to determine the cause of exercise limitation. Relationships were analysed between exercise intolerance and resting haemodynamics and CMR-derived right ventricular function. Potential preoperative predictors of exercise intolerance were analysed using logistic regression analysis.Results68 patients were included in the final analysis. 45 (66%) patients had exercise intolerance 6 months after PEA; in 20 patients this was primarily caused by a cardiovascular limitation. The incidence of residual pulmonary hypertension was significantly higher in patients with persistent exercise intolerance (p=0.001). However, 27 out of 45 patients with persistent exercise intolerance had no residual pulmonary hypertension. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TLCO) was the only predictor of exercise intolerance after PEA.ConclusionsThe majority of CTEPH patients have exercise intolerance after PEA, often despite normalisation of resting haemodynamics. Not all exercise intolerance after PEA is explained by the presence of residual pulmonary hypertension, and lower preoperative TLCO was a strong predictor of exercise intolerance 6 months after PEA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.