2021
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive early exclusion of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: the InShape II study

Abstract: Background The current diagnostic delay of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after pulmonary embolism (PE) is unacceptably long, causing loss of quality-adjusted life years and excess mortality. Validated screening strategies for early CTEPH diagnosis are lacking. Echocardiographic screening among all PE survivors is associated with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been hypothesized that CTEPH might either present as acute-on-chronic PE or develop in the course of acute PE. [4,32] Particularly in the setting of pre-existing conditions that may also contribute to signs of PH, e.g. COPD or chronic heart failure, it should be emphasized that CTPA findings itself are not diagnostic for CTEPH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been hypothesized that CTEPH might either present as acute-on-chronic PE or develop in the course of acute PE. [4,32] Particularly in the setting of pre-existing conditions that may also contribute to signs of PH, e.g. COPD or chronic heart failure, it should be emphasized that CTPA findings itself are not diagnostic for CTEPH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The InShape II algorithm for follow-up after acute PE is an alternative strategy aimed at selecting specific PE patients at high risk of developing CTEPH who require further diagnostic testing. [32,33] This risk stratification starts with assessment of the pre-test probability based on the CTEPH prediction score, combined with evaluation of the presence of symptoms suggestive of CTEPH and the application of the CTEPH rule-out criteria. [34][35][36] Replacing the 'simple' RV/LV diameter ratio with more comprehensive CTPA assessment in the CTEPH prediction score will likely result in improved diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore, propose in Figure 1 to apply a dedicated CTEPH screening algorithm three months after the diagnosis of an acute PE, based on the InShape II study results (25). Pretest probability of CTEPH is assessed by calculating the 'CTEPH prediction score' (Table 1) (26).…”
Section: Screening After Acute Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretest probability of CTEPH is assessed by calculating the 'CTEPH prediction score' (Table 1) (26). Only patients with >6 points or those with symptoms that might be associated with CTEPH (i.e., exertional dyspnea, edema, newly developed palpitations, syncope or chest pain) are subjected to the CTEPH rule-out criteria, that is, assessment of the presence of any of the three ECG criteria of RV pressure overload (Figure 2), or an abnormal age-dependent and gender-dependent NT-proBNP level (25). If one of these rule-out criteria is present, the patient is referred for a TTE.…”
Section: Screening After Acute Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). 46 Follow-up results will ultimately determine the sensitivity of the algorithm and are expected by late 2020.…”
Section: The Target Population For Screening (Principle 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%