This study sought to explore possible relationships between the cognitive developmental level of 10 preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational children and their success in interpreting each of eight commonly described mechanisms of psychological defense. Based upon a formal analysis of the logical transformations inherent in various defensive strategies, three distinct families of defense were identified, each characterized by more or less complex modes of restructuring the appearance of more candid forms of affect expression. The transformations characteristic of these alternative modes of defense were hypothesized to mirror a counterpart set of cognitive operations including the ability to take the inverse or reciprocal of various elements of thought, or to combine such first-order operations into second-order operations upon operations. The results indicated that preoperational children, lacking the requisite cognitive skills, fail to understand defensive transformations of any sort; that concrete operational subjects commonly understand defenses involving inverse and reciprocal operations; and that only formal operational subjects are able to decode defenses involving second order, transformations involving operations upon operations.The purpose of this research was to explore possible relationships between children's developing cognitive abilities and their success or failure in interpreting and explaining various mechanisms of psychological defense. Two prior assumptions underpin and prompted this search. The first of these was the almost routine assumption that cognitive development passes through a series of qualitatively different stages, each of which is in turn characterized by new competencies for dealing with progressively more difficult and logically complex transformational problems. The second and somewhat less conventional assumptionThe authors wish to thank the staff, teachers, and children of the Harley School for their cooperation in this study. Thanks are also due to Charles Eiser and Ruth Dabek, who served as experimenters.Requests for reprints should be sent to Michael J.
Using a case example of one of the mental health agencies in Florida, we demonstrate the utility of concept mapping for developing a program logic model and articulating a program theory for program assessment. The results of the concept mapping procedure enabled identification of 100 program services as described in statements by staff. Moreover, results revealed four major categories of those services and the main strategies used. This information was used to develop the first three components of a logic model. Concept maps were also used to reveal underlying assumptions built into the agency's theoretical approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.