A variety of medications have been implicated in the causation of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Recently, a few case reports have emerged of TMA attributed to the proteasome inhibitors (PI) bortezomib and carfilzomib in patients with multiple myeloma. The aim of this case series was to better characterize the role of PI in the etiology of drug‐induced TMA. We describe eleven patients from six medical centers from around the world who developed TMA while being treated with PI. The median time between medication initiation and diagnosis of TMA was 21 days (range 5 days to 17 months). Median laboratory values at diagnosis included hemoglobin—7.5 g dL−1, platelet count—20 × 109/L, LDH—698 U L−1, creatinine—3.12 mg dL−1. No patient had any other cause of TMA, including ADAMTS13 inhibition, other malignancy or use of any other medication previously associated with TMA. Nine patients had resolution of TMA without evidence of hemolysis after withdrawal of PI. Two patients had stabilization of laboratory values but persistent evidence of hemolysis despite medication withdrawal. One patient had recurrence of TMA with rechallenge of PI. There is a strong level of evidence that PI can cause DITMA. In evaluating patients with suspected TMA, PI use should be recognized as a potential etiology, and these medications should be discontinued promptly if thought to be the cause of TMA. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E348–E352, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Although most prostate cancers are localized, and the majority are curable, recurrences occur in approximately 35% of men. Among patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence and PSA doubling time (PSADT) less than 15 months after radical prostatectomy, prostate cancer accounted for approximately 90% of the deaths by 15 years after recurrence. An immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and impaired cellular immunity are likely largely responsible for the limited utility of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in advanced prostate cancer compared with other tumor types. Thus, for immunologically “cold” malignancies such as prostate cancer, clinical trial development has pivoted towards novel approaches to enhance immune responses. Numerous clinical trials are currently evaluating combination immunomodulatory strategies incorporating vaccine-based therapies, checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Other trials evaluate the efficacy and safety of these immunomodulatory agents’ combinations with standard approaches such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), taxane-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Here, we will review promising immunotherapies in development and ongoing trials for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). These novel trials will build on past experiences and promise to usher a new era to treat patients with mCRPC.

No abstract

TPS192 Background: Despite robust advances in the use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) across multiple cancer types, responses in prostate cancer remain suboptimal. Overall response rates for single-agent ICB in prostate cancer are low, but recent modest gains have been made with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Prostvac-VF Tricom is a therapeutic vaccine that incorporates DNA for the shared self-antigen PSA into the vaccinia (or fowlpox) virus strain. A large randomized phase III clinical trial recently showed no improvement in overall survival (OS) with Prostvac compared with placebo, suggesting that a combinatorial approach is warranted. Personalized neoantigen vaccines based on specific mutated epitopes may have the ability to overcome immunoresistance seen with self antigens. Even in low mutational burden tumors like prostate cancer, T cell responses against neoantigens are observed in patients with favorable clinical outcomes, supporting neoantigen vaccination as a promising therapeutic strategy. Improvements in computational genomics and predictive algorithms have allowed the incorporation of MHC class II neoepitopes and those from gene fusion events relevant in prostate cancer. We thus hypothesized that a strategy utilizing both shared antigen (Prostvac) and personalized MHC-I and MHC-II neoantigen vaccines combined with dual ICB would induce robust immune responses and improve clinical outcomes. To maximize tumor burden reduction and minimize tumor-mediated immunoresistence, we are evaluating this novel strategy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) who have completed frontline docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: This ongoing trial (NCT03532217) began accrual in September 2018. Eighteen of 20 planned patients have been enrolled to date. Eligible patients have histologically confirmed high risk/volume mHSPC defined as 4 or more sites of metastatic disease or visceral involvement. Patients receive continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and have completed upfront docetaxel chemotherapy. Patients begin treatment with Prostvac-VF in combination with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 2 doses), and nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 6 doses) within 60 days of the last dose of docetaxel. Subsequently, patients receive nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks in conjunction with a personalized neoantigen DNA vaccine administered monthly via intramuscular electroporation. The primary objective of this exploratory study is to assess the feasibility, safety/tolerability, and immune responses of this combination strategy. Key secondary objectives include failure-free survival and milestone survival at 2 years, PSA response, and radiographic progression-free survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03532217.

investigated hospitalization and in-hospital mortality trends in the US over the most recent period of data availability. Methods: Using 2012-2016 data from the National Inpatient Sample, admissions with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were identified. Descriptive measures, including demographics, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and total cost (adjusted for inflation using medical care component), stratified by year. Discharge-level weights were applied to represent national estimates and domain analysis was used for subpopulation estimates. An annual percentage change was also calculated to characterize the trend in hospitalization rates over time. Results: In 2016, there were 102,390 admissions of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Mean (95% confidence interval) age was 67.7 (67.4-67.9) years, 47.7% (47.0%-48.5%) female, 69.0% (67.4%-70.7%) White, and 59.1% (58.2%-60.0%) had Medicare as the primary payer. Mean age remained stable from 67.6 (67.3-67.8) in 2012 (p=0.572). Hospitalization rates increased from 29 per 100,000 people in 2012 to 32 per 100,000 people in 2016, with an average annual increase of 2.