:The focus of the study in this research is the implementation of the provisions of Article 35 of Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning Corruption Courts Contrary to the Expectations of Fast, Simple and Low Cost Judicial Principles for Corruption Courts at the Regency/City Level. This study aims to examine and analyze the subject matter, namely analyzing the problems of implementing the provisions of Article 35 of Law Number 46 Year 2009 concerning the court of corruption at the district/city level. To analyze the policy concept so that the judicial process for corruption at the district/city level can reflect the expectations of the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice. To discuss these problems, the type of research used by the author is that this research is structured as "normative" research, namely research that is used to examine various positive legal provisions and general legal principles, in order to obtain scientific truth on the discussion of legal issues being studied. . Based on the results of the research, the implementation of the establishment of the criminal justice system for corruption in each district was not in accordance with what was expected. This means that what is expected with the reality that occurs does not match. Because until now the implementation of article 52 paragraph (2) has not materialized. The impact is that there are difficulties in the process of handling cases that must be resolved by the Corruption Crime Court and the increasing number and accumulation of cases, in addition to the long distance constraints from the corruption courts, a small budget, an average staff of only 2 public prosecutors. so that the settlement of corruption cases that are carried out becomes slow, this is certainly not in accordance with the principles of fast, simple and low-cost justice.
Penelitian ini berlatarbelakang tentang perjanjian. Perjanjian adalah salah satu sumber perikatan. Syarat Sah Perjanjian diatur dalam Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata. Perjanjian yang Dapat Dibatalkan adalah perjanjian yang dapat dimintakan pembatalannya oleh salah satu pihak karena tidak memenuhi syarat subjektif di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata). Dan perjanjian Batal Demi Hukum adalah suatu perjanjian tidak memenuhi syarat objektif , yang dari semula dianggap tidak pernah ada dilahirkan suatu perjanjian dan tidak pernah ada suatu perikatan. Pokok Pembahasan pada Penelitian ini adalah bagaimana syarat sah dari suatu perjanjian dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata serta apa perbedaan dari Perjanjian dapat dibatalkan dan batal demi hukum. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian Normatif yaitu kategori penelitian kepustakaan (library research). Penelitian yang menganalisa buku dan menghasilkan suatu kesimpulan
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.