Background: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of saline infusion sonography to pick up uterine cavity lesions and compare it with the gold standard office hysteroscopy. Methods: Study population consisted of women scheduled for office hysteroscopy for various indications. Uterine cavity of 208 women of the study group were evaluated first by saline infusion sonography and then by office hysteroscopy by two separate examiners. Findings were recorded separately for both procedures and compared. Pain rating was also noted after each procedure. Result: In eight patients either or both the procedures could not be performed for various reasons, hence were excluded from the analysis. With saline infusion sonography, pathological findings were identified in 93 (46.5%) patients and hysteroscopy detected lesions in 88 (44%) patients. For all findings combined sensitivity of saline infusion sonography was 90.9%, specificity 88.3%, positive predictive value 86.0% and negative predictive value 92.5% as compared to hysteroscopy. Former was less painful and easier to perform than the latter. Conclusion: The findings of saline infusion sonography and office hysteroscopy did not differ significantly. Thus saline infusion sonography is an excellent option for uterine cavity evaluation.
Background Use of short-acting anesthetic agents such as propofol and desflurane allows rapid awakening and prompt neurological assessment of patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors. However, there are no studies comparing the effect of these two agents in these patients. We performed this study to compare the intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal (TNTS) pituitary tumor surgery using bispectral index (BIS)-guided administration of desflurane and propofol.
Materials and Methods In this prospective, randomized trial, 60 patients undergoing endoscopic TNTS pituitary surgery were randomized to receive BIS-guided administration of either propofol (Group P) or desflurane (Group D) for the maintenance of anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), intraoperative complications, time to emergence, extubation, cognition, and modified Aldrete score were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 12.0. Categorical and continuous variables were compared between the groups using Fisher’s exact test and t-test, respectively. Emergence from anesthesia and hemodynamics at various stages of surgery was compared between the groups using Wilcoxon rank sum test. The p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results The HR was significantly higher at all stages of surgery in group P (p = 0.01). MAP was comparable between the groups at various time points (p > 0.05). Both emergence time (8.5 vs. 15 minutes; p < 0.00) and extubation time (10 vs. 17.5 minutes; p < 0.00) were significantly shorter in Group D compared with Group P. Modified Aldrete score at 5 and 10 minutes after extubation was higher with desflurane than propofol, but early cognition was comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion The hemodynamics and early cognition score were comparable in patients receiving propofol or desflurane. Desflurane provides rapid emergence and recovery when compared with propofol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.