Introduction:To determine the incidence and mortality of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a cohort of patients with risk factors admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU).Materials and Methods:A prospective observational inception cohort study with no intervention was conducted over 12 months. All patients with at least one known risk factor for ALI/ARDS admitted to the SICU were included in the study. The APACHE II severity of disease classification system scoring was performed within 1 h of admission. The ventilatory parameters and chest radiographs were recorded every 24 h. The P/F ratio, PEEP and Lung Injury Score were calculated each day until the day of discharge from the Intensive Care Unit or for the first 7 days of admission, whichever was shorter.Results:The incidence of ARDS among those who were mechanically ventilated was 11.4%. Sepsis was the most common (34.6%) etiology. Among those with risk factors, the incidence of ARDS was 30% and that of ALI was 32.7%. The mortality in those with ARDS was 41.8%. Those who develop ARDS had higher APACHE II scores, lower pH and higher PaCO2 at admission compared with those who developed ALI or no lung injury.Conclusion:The incidence and mortality of ARDS was similar to other studies. Identifying those with risk factors for ARDS or mortality will enable appropriate interventional measures.

Upper lip bite test (ULBT) is a simple test for predicting difficult intubation. However, it has not been evaluated in acromegalic patients. The primary aim of this study was to compare ULBT with modified Mallampati classification (MMPC) to predict difficult laryngoscopy in acromegalic patients. Over a 5-year period, 64 acromegalic and 63 nonacromegalic patients presenting for excision of pituitary tumor were enrolled. Preoperative airway assessment was done using MMPC and the ULBT. Under anesthesia, laryngoscopic view was assessed using Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading. MMPC III/IV and ULBT grade III were considered predictive of difficult laryngoscopy that was defined as Cormack-Lehane grades III or IV. Difficult intubation was defined as more than 2 direct laryngoscopy attempts involving change of blade or use of bougie/fiberoptic bronchoscope/intubating laryngeal mask airway. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of both tests in predicting difficult laryngoscopy were calculated. Incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation in acromegalics were 24% and 11%, respectively. MMPC and ULBT predicted difficulty in 61% and 14% acromegalics, respectively. However, only 26% and 44% of the laryngoscopies predicted to be difficult by MMMC and ULBT, respectively, were actually difficult. MMPC failed to predict 33% of difficult laryngoscopies whereas ULBT failed to predict 73%. Neither test predicted difficulty in 33% laryngoscopies that turned out to be difficult. Twenty-seven percent of the difficult laryngoscopies were correctly predicted by both tests. In acromegalic group, MMPC was more sensitive, whereas ULBT was more specific. Sensitivity and accuracy of both tests were less in acromegalic patients compared with nonacromegalic controls.

Background:Placement of a cuffed endotracheal tube for the administration of general anesthesia is routine. The cuff of the endotracheal tube is inflated with air to achieve an adequate seal to prevent micro-aspiration. Over inflation of the cuff can decrease the mucosal perfusion, leading to pressure necrosis and nerve palsies. Inadequate seal can lead to micro aspiration. So the cuff pressure has to be monitored and kept within the prescribed limits of 20-30 cms of water.Aim of the Study:To observe the effect of different positions on the endotracheal cuff pressure in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.Materials and Methods:This is an observational study conducted on 70 patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures in various positions. After intubation, the cuff pressure was checked with a cuff pressure manometer, Endotest (Teleflex Medical, Rush) and adjusted to be within the allowable pressure limits as is the routine practice. The cuff pressure was checked again at three time points after achieving the final position with the head on pins, at the end of the procedure and before extubation. Various factors such as the age, position, duration of surgery were studied. There were no major complications like aspiration, stridor or hoarseness of voice post extubation in any of the patients.Results:A significant decline in the cuff pressures were noted from the initial supine position to extubation (P < .001) in the supine group. Also a significant decline in the cuff pressures were found in the prone group from their initial intubated supine position to all the other three corresponding time points namely after final positioning (P < .001), at the end of the procedure (P < .001) and before extubation (P < .001).Conclusion:Cuff pressure has to be checked after achieving the final positioning of the patient and adjusted to the prescribed limits to prevent micro aspiration.

Management of the airway is central to the practice of anesthesia. Several bedside airway assessment methods have been proposed for preoperative identification of patients who are difficult to intubate. The modified Mallampati test (MMT) remains a time-tested technique to date for recognizing an anticipated difficult tracheal intubation as assessed by Cormack-Lehane grade. Both Mallampati and its further modification by Samsoon and Young evaluate patients in the seated position. Recently a study mentioned a change in MMT score from sitting to supine position toward the higher side. However, there is a lack of data regarding the relationship of positional change in MMT with Cormack-Lehane grade. The aim of this prospective study was to assess if MMT score observed in sitting or supine position is a better predictor of difficult tracheal intubation. One hundred and twenty-three patients of ASA physical status I and II, aged 18-60 years, who were scheduled to undergo various neurosurgical procedures were enrolled for the study. We found that the MMT in supine position has a higher positive predictive value and is associated with more true positives as compared to MMT in the sitting position.

Intravenous versus inhalational techniques for rapid emergence from anaesthesia in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery (Review)