Trollius europaeus (Ranunculaceae) is involved in an intimate interaction with several species of Chiastocheta flies (Anthomyiidae) that are both seed predators and pollinators. In this paper, we analyse the oviposition strategy of the six Chiastocheta species found to coexist on T. europaeus in 19 populations from the French Alps. We show that the species are not equivalent in their oviposition behaviour: C. rotundiventris usually deposits no more than one egg per flower in first‐day flowers whereas C. dentifera aggregates its eggs on fruits and thus does not contribute to pollination at all; the four remaining species deposit eggs sequentially during the flowering period from the 2nd to the 7th day. Hence, the outcomes of the interaction in terms of net seed production for the plant greatly depend on the Chiastocheta species visiting it, ranging from a mutualistic to a purely parasitic interaction. We assessed mitochondrial divergence between Chiastocheta spp. by sequencing a 1320‐bp mitochondrial DNA fragment. The low divergence observed between species (0–4.15%) suggests that genus diversification took place recently. Unlike in other plant–insect systems where diversification is usually thought to be driven by cospeciation or host shifts, we propose that Chiastocheta speciation took place within the host plant. Basal separation of a particularly mutualistic species provided favourable conditions for plant specialization on this seed‐parasite as a pollinator early in the evolution of the association. The parasitic species ovipositing on fruits derived from a species ovipositing on flowers. Diversification of the intermediate strategies probably occurred in relation with the Pleistocene climatic events, reproductive isolation between species being reinforced by niche partitioning for oviposition and/or sexual selection.
Several devices for selection of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been used during the last years for reducing tumor cell contamination of the graft. The new CliniMACS system (magnetic-activated cell separation system by Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) was recently approved for clinical use in Europe. To evaluate its purging efficiency and engraftment data in the autologous transplant, PBSC from 28 adult patients with various malignant diseases (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, n = 17; chronic lymphocytic leukemia, n = 5; multiple myeloma, n = 4; acute lymphocytic leukemia, n = 1; medulloblastoma, n = 1) were mobilized by chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (10 microg/kg per day). Thirty leukapheresis products from 28 patients with a median of 4.4 x 10(8) nucleated cells/kg body weight (bw)(range 0.6-10.8 x 10(8)/kg bw) and a median of 7.1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg bw (range 2.8 to 18.8 x 10(6)/kg bw) were selected using the Cobe spectra cell separator (Cobe BCT Inc., Lakewood, CO). After the CliniMACS procedure, the median yield of CD34+ selected cells was 4.5 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.2-11.1 X 10(6)/kg bw) with a median recovery of 69.5% (range 46.9-87.3%) and a median purity of 97.7% (range 89.4-99.8%). The procedure did not alter viability of selected cells, which was tested by propidium iodide staining. So far, purified PBSC were used for autologous transplantation in 15 out of 28 patients after total body irradiation and/or high-dose chemotherapy. Median time to reach an absolute neutrophil count > 500/microl was 12 days (range 10-18 days), platelet recovery >50,000/microl occurred at day + 16 (range 11-22). With a median follow-up time of 12 months (range 3-19), 5 patients died of relapse. We confirmed the feasibility and safety of the CliniMACS CD34+ cell enrichment procedure in adult patients with autologous PBSC transplantation.
These results suggest that adipose tissue lipolytic activity of subc abdominal adipocytes acts as a determinant of fat oxidation in obese men.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.