This mixed‐methods study aimed to determine nurses’ views on the use of the Turkish version of the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). Phase 1 of the study consisted of a survey of perioperative and surgical nursing unit nurses’ perceptions on the use of the SSC. The results showed that personnel believed that every step of the checklist was not always applied and that an increased workload and the lack of team cooperation negatively affected the use of the checklist. Phase 2 of the study involved RN circulator interviews and focused on their experiences using the SSC, the obstacles to SSC implementation, and ways to increase compliance. We interviewed 126 nurses during phase 1 and 20 nurses during phase 2. We analyzed the interviews and identified three themes: the importance of using the SSC, barriers to using the checklist, and compliance with the checklist and applicability.

The study aims to determine the fear of coronavirus and its affecting factors. It was conducted as a cross-sectional study. Data on participants were collected using an online questionnaire spread throughout social media, e-mail, and WhatsApp groups. Socio-demographic questionnaire form, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to collect data. Number, percentage, mean, t-test, One-Way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to evaluate the research data. The research was completed with 727 people. A statistically significant relation was found between the COVID-19 fear with age, gender, marital status, having children, having a chronic disease, working status and being health personnel, watching coronavirus news, and always talking about coronavirus at-home settings. Accordingly, it is recommended to determine the fear of coronavirus in society, to identify high-risk individuals by performing community screenings, and to provide psychological support. It is very important to diversify and implement protective intervention programs to reduce some of the psychological consequences of fear and fear.

This study aims to present the relationship among nurses' expressions of the meaning and purpose of life and their belief in the transformative power of suffering. 446 nurses working in two separate hospitals participated in the study. In the data collection, the Transformative Power of Suffering Scale and the Meaning and Purpose of Life Scale were employed. The study concluded that the nurses working in a city hospital, married, and working in the profession for four years or more, find life more meaningful. There was no statistical difference between the transformative power of suffering and demographic variables. A moderate positive relationship between the Meaning of Life scale sub-dimension and the Transformative Power of Suffering Scale and a weak relationship in the negative direction with the meaninglessness of life sub-dimension was discovered. It can be concluded that all of the nurses believe that pain has a transformative power and that the institution they work in and their working time are effective in their outlook on life.

Aim: This study aims to identify the causes of medication administration errors and the reasons stated by nurses working in surgical clinics and surgical intensive care units for not reporting these errors, and to compare the number of errors nurses witness and the number of errors actually reported. Method: The research sample of this descriptive cross-sectional study consists of 125 nurses working in surgical clinics and surgical intensive care units. Data were collected using the face-to-face survey method. The Nurse Personal Information Form and the Medication Administration Error Scale were used to collect data. Results: The perceived medication administration error rate was found to be 59%; however, 61.6% of the nurses reported that only 0-20% of medication administration errors were actually reported. The main reasons for not reporting medication errors are administrative response (4.10±1.18) and fear (3.28±0.99). The most important reason for not reporting errors due to the administrative response is that no positive feedback is given after correct medication administration (4.18±1.53). The perceived cause of medication administration error is pharmacy-related and system-related, which explains 26% of the reason for not reporting the error due to fear. The fact that the reason for medication administration error originates from the physician, pharmacy and system explains 51% of the reason for not reporting the error due to disagreement over the error. Conclusion: There is a major difference between the medication administration errors nurses witness and the errors they actually report. The errors are not reported due to administrative response and fear.

This study was conducted to examine the experiences of operating room nurses care for COVID-19 positive and suspected patients during the surgical process. Material and Methods: This study was conducted qualitatively with operating room nurses between 01-31 May 2021. 22 operating room nurses were interviewed face-to-face-in-depth in the break room of the operating room. Data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step method. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used in reporting this research. Results: Three themes were determined: Difficulties experienced in the operating room during the COVID-19 epidemic, effect of the COVID-19 epidemic on the operating room organization and the effect of the risk of contamination on the surgical team communication. 7 sub-themes were identified as fear of catching and transmitting the infection, equipment problems, difficulties in the management of emergency cases, operation and working times, changes in the patient transfer line and operating room, social isolation and reduced communication, and fear of medical error. Conclusion:This study reveals difficulties experienced by nurses due to COVID-19, effect of the pandemic on the operating room organization and nurses, and effect of the risk of transmission on the surgical team communication. Nurses have fear of catching and transmitting infection in the operating room, lack of equipment, and experience anxiety in managing emergency cases. The pandemic caused changes in the organization of the operating room. Besides, nurses experienced social isolation and team communication decreased, the use of equipment disrupted communication with the surgical team, and this situation led to fear of medical error.

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of cooperation between physicians and nurses working in ‎surgical clinics on the tendency of nurses to make medical errors. The research was carried out in a ‎descriptive manner at Yozgat Bozok University Research and Application Center surgical units between April-‎May 2021. 130 surgical nurses and 40 surgeons were included in the study. In the evaluation of the data, ‎independent two-sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, one-way analysis of variance, Duncan test, Kruskal ‎Wallis test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and regression analysis were used. When the Jefferson Physician ‎and Nurse Professional Collaboration Scale mean scores of physicians and nurses were examined; the mean ‎score of nurses was 52.2±5.8, and the mean score of physicians was 50.7±4.6. Nurses' Malpractice Tendency ‎Scale mean score was determined as 236.1±16.5. It was determined that when the Jefferson Physician and ‎Nurse Professional Collaboration Scale score of the nurses increased by one unit, the Malpractice Tendency ‎Scale score increased by 1.247. Statistically, it was determined that there was a weak positive relationship ‎‎(p<0.05). The existence of a healthy and effective cooperation system between physicians and nurses in ‎surgical units is important in preventing medical errors. In our study, it was determined that the physician-‎nurse relationship in surgical units had an effect on the medical error tendency of nurses. In line with the data ‎obtained, it is recommended to measure the reflections of the trainings on the cooperation in order to ‎increase the effective trainings in changing the professional communication within the team on doctor-nurse ‎cooperation in a positive way and to strengthen the concrete data.