BackgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a worldwide health-care burden. Prevalence rates vary and the distribution of genotypes depends on geographical location. Here, the recent prevalence of HCV infections and distribution of HCV genotypes among Korean blood donors were studied.MethodsBetween February 2005 and December 2009, a total of 11,064,532 donors were screened for anti-HCV and 11,412,690 donors were screened for HCV RNA. HCV genotyping was conducted for 748 blood donors with HCV RNA by using the line probe assay (VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay, Bayer Healthcare, USA) after amplification of the 5'-untranslated and core regions of the genome.ResultsThe anti-HCV prevalence was 0.16% (17,250/11,064,532). HCV RNA was detected in 959 out of the 11,412,690 donors (8.4/100,000). HCV RNA was more prevalent among women, donors who resided at harbor sites, and first-time donors. In addition, the prevalence of HCV RNA increased with age. The genotypes of 740 out of the 748 tested donors (98.9%) were identified. HCV genotype 1b (47.7%) and 2a/2c (35.0%) were dominant. Genotypes 2 (7.6%), 2b (2.3%), 3a (1.6%), 1a (1.3%), 1 (0.9%), 2v (0.5%), 1v (0.1%), and 3 (0.1%) were also identified. Genotype 4a/4c/4d (0.1%) was detected for the first time in one Korean blood donor.ConclusionsThe distribution of HCV genotypes in Korea has not changed remarkably, with the exception of genotype 4a/4c/4d. A periodic study to monitor the prevalence of HCV infections and the distribution of HCV genotypes is required to identify emerging genotypes in Korea.

-3.2×104 IU/mL) except for 1 donor (1.33×10 8 IU/mL). All the isolated B19V DNAs from 6 donors were identified as genotype I. Nine out of 10 B19V DNA positive donors also possessed anti-B19V IgG only or IgG and IgM. The prevalence of anti-B19V IgG was 60.1% (558/928). Conclusions :The prevalence of B19V DNA in Korean blood donors was not high and most donors also possessed neutralizing anti-B19V antibodies. Thus, the implementation of a B19V screening test for Korean blood donors does not appear to be imperative. (Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:58-64)

Background : The safety of plasma derivatives has been reinforced since 1980s by variable pathogen inactivation or elimination techniques. Nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) for the source plasma has also been implemented worldwide. Recently nanofiltration has been used in some country for ensuring safety of plasma derivatives to eliminate non-enveloped viruses such as parvovirus B19 (B19V) and hepatitis A virus (HAV). We evaluated the efficacy of nanofiltration for the elimination of B19V and HAV.Methods : To verify the efficacy of nanofiltration, we adopted a 20 nm Viresolve NFP (Millipore, USA) in the scaling down (1:1,370) model of the antithrombin III production. As virus stock solutions, we used B19V reactive plasma and porcine parvovirus (PPV) and HAV obtained from cell culture. And 50% tissue culture infectious dose was consumed as infectious dose. The methods used to evaluate the virus-elimination efficacy were reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for B19V and the cytopathic effect calculation after filtration for PPV and HAV.Results : B19V was not detected by RT-PCR in the filtered antithrombin III solutions with initial viral load of 6.42×105 IU/mL and 1.42×10 5 IU/mL before filtration. The virus-elimination efficacy of nanofiltration for PPV and HAV were ≥10 3.32 and ≥10

Background: While plateletpheresis donation results in less red blood cell loss and therefore less depletion of storage iron, repeated plateletpheresis can also lead to iron depletion. To determine the safety of regular plateletpheresis donations, this study estimated donor's iron status according to age, gender, number of donations, and donation interval. Methods: The study population included 5,109 plateletpheresis donors (4,824 males, 285 females), who passed the hemoglobin (Hb) criteria for plateletpheresis donation of 12.0 g/dL or more in an inclusion period (September 2013∼November 2013). During donor screening, serum ferritin levels were measured for assessment of iron status of plateletpheresis donors. Results: Mean age of donors was 30.4 years (range: 17∼59). Donors with a history of donation of more than 3 years accounted for 89.3% and 74.0% in males and females, respectively. Mean donation interval and annual donation number in male (female) donors was 11.9 (7.2) weeks and 4.2 (8.7) times, respectively. Approximately 37.8% of male donors and 64.2% of female donors had a serum ferritin level of less than 15 ng/mL. Serum ferritin levels showed correlation with donation interval, as the percentage of donors with a low ferritin level decreased with increase in donation interval (: 0.191∼0.438, P＜0.001). Serum ferritin levels also showed correlation with annual plateletpheresis number (: -0.261∼-0.411, P＜0.001). Conclusion: Depleted iron store was observed in nearly 40% of donors who had acceptable Hb levels for plateletpheresis donation. Hb pre-donation screening is not sufficient to reduce the risk of iron deficiency in regular plateletpheresis donors. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2015;26:282-290)

Background: In the Korean Red Cross, anti-HTLV (Human T-cell lymphotropic virus)-1/2 screening assay has been performed in all donated blood except plasmapheresis since April 2009. For anti-HTLV-1/2 positive donors, both Western blot (WB) and nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) are performed as confirmatory assays. In this study, we evalutated the efficiency of the current confirmatory assay scheme to improve the confirmatory assay scheme for anti-HTLV1/2. Methods: The results of the HTLV confirmatory assay from April 15th 2009 to April 14th 2015 were analyzed using the Blood Information Management System of the Korean Red Cross. We also investigated the current situation in other countries. Results: Of 12,923,854 donations, 3,483 (0.027%) showed positive results in anti-HTLV-1/2. Of the 3,483 donations, 499 (14.3%) showed positive results in WB or NAT or both. The number of positive cases in both was 461. Therefore, the concordance rate was 92.4%. In the cases of positive results only in NAT, the WB results were all indeterminate (ID). Most countries are using immunoblot assay as a confirmatory assay for anti-HTLV positive blood donors. In the results, there were no cases of positive result in only NAT with a negative result in immunoblot assay. Conclusion: It was considered that the accomplishment of only WB as a confirmatory assay for anti-HTLV-1/2 positive donors may be sufficient in the aspect of safety and economics. However, in the case of WB ID result, it may be better to perform NAT as a supplemental test.