ABSTRACT:We assessed seasonal histological changes as markers of health status in mussels Mytilus spp. sampled from Southampton Water, Hampshire, UK and the River Exe, Devon, UK between November 2004 and October 2005. A total of 29 health parameters related to pathogens, inflammatory and non-specific pathologies, and reproductive and physiological condition were recorded monthly from individual mussels collected from these 2 sites. We then assessed the diffential prevalence of these health parameters according to species. M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis and their hybrids were identified using the Glu-5' gene and the ME15 and ME16 primer sets that distinguish alleles specific to M. edulis (180 bp), M. galloprovincialis (126 bp) and hybrids (180 bp/126 bp). Although no overall annual differences were observed between species with respect to median levels of adipogranular (ADG) tissue and reproductive status, specific differences in reproductive status were observed within individual months. During these months (August to October), M. edulis exhibited a relatively lower reproductive status compared to M. galloprovincialis and hybrids. With respect to all remaining health parameters (pathogens, inflammatory and non-specific pathology), principal components analysis revealed no overall differences between species throughout the year. However, greater differences were observed between species during the autumn and winter than during the spring and summer, thus indicating that species differences may be exacerbated by season. This study highlights how species can affect the accurate interpretation of histopathology data collected during biological effects monitoring programmes. Whether species can also affect the biomarker response of Mytilus mussels to contaminated environments remains to be shown. The results are discussed in the context of biological effects monitoring utilising mussels.

The lower perennial corridor of the Little Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona, is numerically dominated by endemic desert fishes and therefore significant for conservation of these species. From 2000 to 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducted monitoring of native fishes in the Little Colorado River near its confluence with the Colorado River. The primary focus of these efforts was to estimate the spring and fall abundance of native fishes, especially the federally endangered humpback chub Gila cypha. Because humpback chub in Grand Canyon are influenced by operations of Glen Canyon Dam, our efforts provide managers of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program with abundance estimates and trends of humpback chub in the Little Colorado River, the most important tributary in Grand Canyon for spawning and production of this species. From 2001 to 2006, the spring abundance estimates of humpback chub ≥150 and ≥200 mm remained relatively low (≤3,419 and ≤2,002 fish, respectively), thereafter significantly increasing to highs of 8,083 and 6,250, respectively, by spring 2010. Also from 2000 to 2006, the fall abundance estimates of humpback chub were substantially below those abundances estimated after 2006. In addition, flannelmouth sucker Catostomus latipinnis and bluehead sucker Catostomus discobolus showed post-2006 increases in relative abundance, suggesting a systemwide event occurred that was beneficial to native fishes. Most of the increases of humpback chub occurred during the spring season in the reaches of the Little Colorado River between 5 and 13.57 km upstream from the confluence. Successful production of age 0 year classes of humpback chub may be partially driven by hydrograph dynamics of the Little Colorado River, whereas water temperatures and predation pressures in the mainstem Colorado River likely influence survivorship of native fishes into subadult and adult life stages.

No abstract

We quantified tag retention, survival, and growth in juvenile, captive‐reared Humpback Chub Gila cypha marked with three different tag types: (1) Biomark 12.5‐mm, 134.2‐kHz, full duplex PIT tags injected into the body cavity with a 12‐gauge needle; (2) Biomark 8.4‐mm, 134.2‐kHz, full duplex PIT tags injected with a 16‐gauge needle; and (3) Northwest Marine Technology visible implant elastomer (VIE) tags injected under the skin with a 29‐gauge needle. Estimates of tag loss, tagging‐induced mortality, and growth were evaluated for 60 d with each tag type for four different size‐groups of fish: 40–49 mm, 50–59 mm, 60–69 mm, and 70–79 mm TL. Total length was a significant predictor of the probability of PIT tag retention and mortality for both 8‐mm and 12‐mm PIT tags, and the smallest fish had the highest rates of tag loss (12.5–30.0%) and mortality (7.5–20.0%). Humpback Chub of sizes 40–49 mm TL and tagged with VIE tags had no mortality but did have a 17.5% tag loss. Growth rates of all tagged fish were similar to controls. Our data indicate Humpback Chub can be effectively tagged using either 8‐mm or 12‐mm PIT tags with little tag loss or mortality at sizes as low as 65 mm TL. Received July 24, 2014; accepted October 31, 2014

We developed an individual‐based population viability analysis model (females only) for evaluating risk to populations from catastrophic events or conservation and research actions. This model tracks attributes (size, weight, viability, etc.) for individual fish through time and then compiles this information to assess the extinction risk of the population across large numbers of simulation trials. Using a case history for the Little Colorado River population of Humpback Chub Gila cypha in Grand Canyon, Arizona, we assessed extinction risk and resiliency to a catastrophic event for this population and then assessed a series of conservation actions related to removing specific numbers of Humpback Chub at different sizes for conservation purposes, such as translocating individuals to establish other spawning populations or hatchery refuge development. Our results suggested that the Little Colorado River population is generally resilient to a single catastrophic event and also to removals of larvae and juveniles for conservation purposes, including translocations to establish new populations. Our results also suggested that translocation success is dependent on similar survival rates in receiving and donor streams and low emigration rates from recipient streams. In addition, translocating either large numbers of larvae or small numbers of large juveniles has generally an equal likelihood of successful population establishment at similar extinction risk levels to the Little Colorado River donor population. Our model created a transparent platform to consider extinction risk to populations from catastrophe or conservation actions and should prove useful to managers assessing these risks for endangered species such as Humpback Chub. Received August 28, 2012; accepted March 13, 2013

No abstract

Ecologists estimate vital rates, such as growth and survival, to better understand population dynamics and identify sensitive life history parameters for species or populations of concern. Here, we assess spatiotemporal variation in growth, movement, density, and survival of subadult humpback chub living in the Little Colorado River, Grand Canyon, AZ from 2001-2002 and 2009-2013. We divided the Little Colorado River into three reaches and used a multistate mark-recapture model to determine rates of movement and differences in survival and density between sites for different cohorts. Additionally, site-specific and year-specific effects on growth were evaluated using a linear model. Results indicate that summer growth was higher for upstream sites compared with downstream sites. In contrast, there was not a consistent spatial pattern across years in winter growth; however, river-wide winter growth was negatively related to the duration of floods from 1 October to 15 May. Apparent survival was estimated to be lower at the most downstream site compared with the upstream sites; however, this could be because in part of increased emigration into the Colorado River at downstream sites. Furthermore, the 2010 cohort (i.e. fish that are age 1 in 2010) exhibited high apparent survival relative to other years. Movement between reaches varied with year, and some years exhibited preferential upstream displacement. Improving understanding of spatiotemporal effects on age 1 humpback chub survival can help inform current management efforts to translocate humpback chub into new locations and give us a better understanding of the factors that may limit this tributary's carrying capacity for humpback chub. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

I examined the effects of turbidity, discharge, and temperature on hoop-net catch rates of native humpback chub Gila cypha, speckled dace Rhinichthys osculus, flannelmouth suckers Catostomus latipinnis, and bluehead suckers C. discobolus in the Little Colorado River, Arizona. Results indicated that native fish catch rates were primarily influenced by whether turbidity levels were below or above species-specific thresholds of approximately 545 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) for humpback chub, 221 NTU for speckled dace, 846 NTU for flannelmouth suckers, and 70 NTU for bluehead suckers. The effects of discharge were negligible, but discharge did dictate the turbidity level. Turbidity levels at hoop-net deployment relative to the turbidity thresholds predetermined much of the catchability of fish. Catch rates were highest in a high-catch zone consisting of the lowermost turbidities, which ranged up to the start of a transition zone for each species (humpback chub, 54 NTU; speckled dace, 29 NTU; flannelmouth sucker, 81 NTU; bluehead sucker, 26 NTU), and the secondary effects of temperature were only detectable in this zone. Catch rates within the transition zone decreased at higher turbidities up to the thresholds and thereafter remained consistently low at all higher turbidities within this low-catch zone. The effects of the turbidity thresholds on catch rates decreased for larger fish of all species. Theoretically, the effects of turbidity reflect a behavioral switch by native fishes from relying primarily on structural cover (e.g., hoop nets) to using turbidity as cover to reduce the predation risk as turbidity increases from below to above the thresholds. Moreover, turbidities within the low-catch zone could be totally incapacitating the fishes' visual capabilities such that fish perceive these turbidity levels as unlimited visual cover. The turbidity threshold concept probably applies to the hoop-net catch rates of other fishes in other riverine systems.*