The cost of direct potable reuse (DPR) using reverse osmosis (RO) and full advanced treatment (FAT) based on advanced oxidation process was compared with a non‐RO‐based treatment train with ozone and biologically active filtration (BAF). Costs were calculated assuming a blend of 15% advanced treated water with the current potable water supply, Lake Lanier. The 30‐year amortized capital and operational costs were US$4,830/mil gal for FAT and $1,900/mil gal for ozone‐BAF. The primary additional cost associated with FAT was due to the mechanical evaporation of RO brine concentrate disposal. The costs for producing water using FAT integrating a vibratory shear‐enhanced processing‐RO (VSEP‐RO) to further concentrate the RO brine were lower than those for mechanical evaporation alone ($3,510/mil gal). While VSEP‐RO improved overall costs, ozone‐BAF‐based treatment was less than half the cost of FAT. Thus, ozone‐BAF may provide a more economical alternative compared with FAT for inland facilities considering DPR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.