This research evaluates the properties of a measure of culturally linked values of Mexican Americans in early adolescence and adulthood. The items measure were derived from qualitative data provided by focus groups in which Mexican Americans’ (adolescents, mothers and fathers) perceptions of key values were discussed. The focus groups and a preliminary item refinement resulted in the fifty-item Mexican American Cultural Values Scales (identical for adolescents and adults) that includes nine value subscales. Analyses of data from two large previously published studies sampling Mexican American adolescents, mothers, and fathers provided evidence of the expected two correlated higher order factor structures, reliability, and construct validity of the subscales of the Mexican American Cultural Values Scales as indicators of values that are frequently associated with Mexican/Mexican American culture. The utility of this measure for use in longitudinal research, and in resolving some important theoretical questions regarding dual cultural adaptation, are discussed.

Mexican American adolescents face disparities in mental health and academic achievement, perhaps in part because of discrimination experiences. However, culturally-related values, fostered by ethnic pride and socialization, may serve to mitigate the negative impact of discrimination. Guided by the Stress Process Model, the current study examined risk and protective processes using a 2-wave multi-informant study with 750 Mexican American families. Specifically, we examined two possible mechanisms by which Mexican American values may support positive outcomes in the context of discrimination; as a protective factor (moderator) or risk reducer (mediator). Analyses supported the role of Mexican American values as a risk reducer. This study underscores the importance of examining multiple mechanisms of protective processes in understanding Mexican American adolescent resilience. KeywordsMexican American; adolescents; discrimination; cultural values; ethnic socialization; ethnic pride; mental health; academic achievement; longitudinal Discrimination and adjustment for Mexican American adolescents: A prospective examination of the benefits of culturally-related valuesLatino adolescents in the United States are at elevated risk for a variety of mental health and academic problems (Rumbaut, 1994). Mexican American adolescents, in particular, report higher levels of depressive symptoms (Hill, Bush, & Roosa, 2003), as well as externalizing behaviors (Gorman-Smith, Tolan, Henry, & Florsheim, 2000). Moreover, despite Mexican American families' emphasis on the value of school as an important pathway to success, Mexican American adolescents report lower academic self-efficacy (Fuligni, Witkow, & Garcia, 2005) and are more likely to drop out of school (Chavez, Oetting, & Swaim, 1994) than European American peers. Some have suggested that these elevated mental health and Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Cady Berkel, Prevention Research Center, Arizona State University, 900 S McAllister Ave, Tempe, AZ 85287-6005, cady.berkel@asu.edu. In Press Journal of Research on Adolescence.This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the journal. It is not the copy of record. NIH Public Access NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript academic risks are due in part to experiences of discrimination commonly reported by Mexican American adolescents, which have been linked to poor mental health and academic achievement (Coker, et al., 2009;Stone & Han, 2005). Nevertheless, many Mexican American adolescents have good mental health outcomes, are successful in school (Gonzales, Knight, Birman, & Sirolli, 2004), and often appear to be more resilient than one might expect given the stressors to which they are exposed (Escobar, Nervi, & Gara, 2000). One potential mechanism operating among Mexican American adolescents that may support this resilience is the socialization processes that lead to the internalization of culturallyrelated values associated with th...

Research examining how cultural factors affect adjustment of ethnic minority individuals would be strengthened if study samples better represented the diversity within these populations. To recruit a representative sample of Mexican American families, the authors implemented a multiple-step process that included sampling communities to represent diversity in cultural and economic conditions, recruiting participants through schools, using culturally attractive recruitment processes, conducting interviews in participants' homes, and providing a financial incentive. The result was a sample of 750 families that were diverse in cultural orientation, social class, and type of residential communities and were similar to the census description of this population. Thus, using culturally appropriate adaptations to common recruitment strategies makes it possible to recruit representative samples of Mexican Americans.

This study examined family and neighborhood influences relevant to low-income status to determine how they combine to predict the parenting behaviors of Mexican–American mothers and fathers. The study also examined the role of parenting as a mediator of these contextual influences on adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Study hypotheses were examined in a diverse sample of Mexican–American families in which 750 mothers and 467 fathers reported on their own levels of parental warmth and harsh parenting. Family economic hardship, neighborhood familism values, and neighborhood risk indicators were all uniquely associated with maternal and paternal warmth, and maternal warmth mediated the effects of these contextual influences on adolescent externalizing symptoms in prospective analyses. Parents’ subjective perceptions of neighborhood danger interacted with objective indicators of neighborhood disadvantage to influence maternal and paternal warmth. Neighborhood familism values had unique direct effects on adolescent externalizing symptoms in prospective analyses, after accounting for all other context and parenting effects.

Historically, women and minority group members have been underrepresented in the professions and in better paying, high-status jobs. Even when they have been admitted to such positions, these underrepresented persons often have been the only member of their social category: a token. Previous field and laboratory research has shown that "tokens" attract disproportionate attention and are either evaluated unfairly or evaluated on the basis of their normal reactions to differential treatment by majority group members. We tested the possibilities of whether tokens might suffer more cognitive deficits than would nontokens, and whether they do so even when they are treated no differently. College students were led to believe that they were sharing their views on everyday topics with three other students (actually videotaped confederates), who were either all of the student's own sex or all of the opposite sex. In a later memory test, token participants remembered fewer of the opinions that they and the three other students had expressed than did nontokens. Observers, in contrast, remembered more of what token subjects said than what the three other students said. Theoretical and public policy implications are discussed.