Background and Aim Carcinoma of the stomach is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Surgery for gastric cancer in the form of total or distal gastrectomy is definitive treatment. Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) though improves postoperative nutritional status and outcome, it is not devoid of its complications. In this study, we present the outcomes of nasojejunal (NJ) feeding and FJ and complications associated with them. Materials and Methods It is both retrospective and prospective observational study in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent FJ and those who underwent NJ route of feeding placed intraoperatively. Results A total of 279 patients of gastric cancer who underwent surgery were taken into study, of which, 165 were male and 114 females. FJ was done in 42 and NJ in 237 patients, respectively. Gastrectomy + NJ was done in 128 patients, gastrectomy + FJ in 27 patients, gastrojejunostomy + NJ in 109 patients, and FJ in 15 patients. We had three patients of bile leaks in FJ group, of which one patient had intraperitoneal leak who needed re-exploration; rest of the two had peri-FJ external leaks, who were managed conservatively. Most of the complications of NJ group were minor. Conclusion Our study of 279 patients in gastric cancer has shown that FJ is sometimes associated with major complications with increased hospital stay and morbidity when compared with NJ tube feeding without any difference in nutritional outcomes. Hence, NJ route of postoperative enteral nutrition can be considered as an alternative to FJ wherever feasible in view of its technical safety and minor complications and morbidity.

No abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare the surgical volume and outcomes between this COVID-19 period and data from non-COVID-19 period of last year. A retrospective observational study was done in one single surgical unit of a dedicated oncology center in a peripheral location in India. The comparison was done between patients undergoing major cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic period of 1st April to 30th June 2020, when a nation-wide lockdown was in force, to a comparable period of last year. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software 20.0. A total of 72 patients underwent major cancer surgery during this period, with surgery for breast cancer ( n = 26) being the major sub-site operated. This was a significant decrease from the total 209 major cancer surgeries performed during a similar period of last year (2019) ( p < 0.05). There were several reasons for the decrease in surgical numbers, including the difficulty in travel and accommodation during the lockdown period. The mean distance of patient’s residence from the treating hospital was 45.7 km (range 4 to 165 km). Public transport was in a limbo and inter-state travel was restrictive with mandatory quarantine rules in effect. Morbidity associated with major surgeries was observed to be significantly less during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 times (8.3% vs 17.2% with a p value of < 0.05), which can probably be attributed to the lesser number of complex surgical procedures being performed. There was no significant difference between the total mortality percentages (2.8% vs 3.8%). A total of 156 PPE kits were used (3–4/per patient) throughout the in-hospital care of the surgical patients included in this study. In the midst of a pandemic, the delivery of surgical cancer care is an essential service and although the surgical volume is significantly hampered due to various reasons, the outcomes are largely unaffected.

No abstract

Background and Aim Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is an important cause of major morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We intend to estimate the incidence and study the risk factors and outcomes of patients who developed this dreaded complication. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. We included all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a specialized surgical unit of a single tertiary care cancer center in Northeast India. The period of study was from 23 April 2012 to 27 December 2019. The 2016 update on the definition of POPF by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula was used to define the complication. Chi‐square test and Fischer's exact test were applied to categorical variables. t‐test was used to quantify mean difference among continuous variables. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval. Results A total of 59 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy during the study period with almost equal distribution among males and females (29 and 30 patients respectively). The mean age of the patients was 54.0 years (range 20–72). Grade A, B, and C pancreatic fistulas were seen in five (8.5%), three (5.1%), and two (3.4%) patients, respectively. Preoperative hyperbilirubinemia, pancreatic duct size ≤3 mm, hypoalbuminemia, preoperative biliary decompression, and prolonged duration of surgery were identified as risk factors for POPF. POPF also resulted in increased 90‐day mortality (20%). Conclusion POPF remains a potentially life‐threatening complication of pancreaticoduodenectomies. The knowledge and management of modifiable risk factors for this condition may help in mitigating this problem.