This paper assesses the impact of the spread of COVID-19 and the lockdown on wholesale prices and quantities traded in agricultural markets. We compare whether these impacts differ across non-perishable (wheat) and perishable commodities (tomato and onion), and the extent to which any adverse impacts are mitigated by the adoption of a greater number of agricultural market reform measures. We use a granular data set comprising daily observations for 3 months from nearly 1000 markets across five states and use a double-and triple-difference estimation strategy. Expectedly, our results differ by type of commodity and period of analysis. While all prices spiked initially in April, they recovered relatively quickly, underscoring the importance of time duration for analysis. Wheat prices were anchored in large part by the minimum support price, while tomato prices were lower in some months. Supply constraints began easing in May with greater market arrivals perhaps reflecting distress sales. Market reform measures did help in insulating farmers from lower prices, but these effects are salient for the perishable goods, and not so much for wheat where the government remained the dominant market player. Taken together, these results point to considerable resilience in agricultural markets in dealing with the COVID-19 shock, buffered by adequate policy support.

No abstract

Although the COVID‐19 pandemic resulted in about a 24% decline in India's GDP during the April–June 2020 quarter, the nation's agricultural sector, somewhat surprisingly, seems to have done remarkably well. This paper examines whether the public transfer program Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY), announced immediately after the lockdown, benefited farmers in dealing with the COVID shock. Overall, 95% of the smallholders received support from at least one of PMGKY's four components. Direct cash transfers had significantly more impact than in‐kind transfer schemes. The result shows that farmers receiving cash transfers under PM‐KISAN, one component of PMGKY, were more likely to invest in buying seeds. In contrast, farmers receiving cash transfers under PM‐UY, another piece of PMGKY, were more likely to invest in fertilizer and pesticides. Finally, smallholders who received benefits from all four components of PMGKY were more likely to invest in purchasing seeds, fertilizer, and pesticides. Findings suggest the fungibility of public cash transfers from the recent PMGKY scheme is significant in alleviating credit constraints and increasing future investments in modern inputs.

This paper attempts to address the impact of the MGNREGA on the rural agricultural sector, focusing on cropping patterns, irrigated area, crop yields, wages and rural employment. The analysis is based on two data sources: the first is a unique district-season level panel dataset that we construct using multiple sources; and the second is unit-record data from the NSS Employment Unemployment Surveys. To identify causal effects, we employ a difference-indifference matching (DIDM) procedure, where districts are matched based on propensity scores; the use of propensity scores represents a novel aspect of this paper. We also examine pre-programme trends for each outcome variable to provide a check on the validity of our estimates. Our results indicate modest changes in cropping patterns that are state-and periodspecific; however they do not indicate any improvements in crop yields that were expected given the MGNREGA's focus on investments in irrigation, although there is some evidence that irrigated area may have expanded after a lag. We also find that there is no systematic evidence of impact on wages, and therefore no evidence that public works employment in MGNREGA crowded out casual labour in agriculture.

No abstract

This paper examines the employment effects of an emergency assistance package by the Indian government, the Garib Kalyan Rozgar Abhiyaan that had the sole objective of providing employment to returning migrants. It was targeted to 116 districts that had seen returning migrants in excess of 25,000, was limited in duration to 4 months, and was directed at top‐up funding to public works and 25 other target sectors in rural areas. Using a sharp RD approach, we find that the intervention had substantive impacts on employment and in reducing rationing in public works and that it did so in a cost‐effective manner. In contrast to the widespread impression of a slow‐moving bureaucracy, these results point to an administrative machinery that was able to successfully implement this project within a relatively short period of time.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE:To study the clinical profile of children admitted with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (SAIMS) Indore. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the case records of 30 children admitted with DKA to our intensive care unit, from Jan 2011-Jan 2015. Information regarding personal details, chief complaints, clinical features, laboratory parameters, management and outcome was recorded using a predesigned pro forma. RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 8 years (range 9months-13yrs); 12 boys and 18 girls were enrolled. Diabetes was newly diagnosed in 20 cases and known cases of type1 diabetes were 10. Commonest presenting complaints were fever (66%), rapid breathing (60%), vomiting (60%), and altered sensorium (26. 6%). Average length of PICU stay was 58. 6hrs. All of the cases had elevated HbA1c, except one. Co-morbities found were UTI in 12 (40%), dysentery in 2 (6. 6%), and viral hepatitis in1 (3. 33%). Cerebral edema was seen in 1 case. There was no mortality in our study. CONCLUSION: DKA in children if diagnosed early and managed timely has good outcome. Poor compliance is most important precipitating factor in known cases of T1DM.