BackgroundRadiotherapy is an effective treatment of intermediate/high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer, however, >30% of patients relapse within 5 years. Clinicopathological parameters currently fail to identify patients prone to systemic relapse and those whom treatment intensification may be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to independently validate the performance of a 70-gene Metastatic Assay in a cohort of diagnostic biopsies from patients treated with radical radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy.Patients and methodsA bridging cohort of prostate cancer diagnostic biopsy specimens was profiled to enable optimization of the Metastatic Assay threshold before further independent clinical validation in a cohort of diagnostic biopsies from patients treated with radical radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess assay performance in predicting biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS).ResultsGene expression analysis was carried out in 248 patients from the independent validation cohort and the Metastatic Assay applied. Ten-year MFS was 72% for Metastatic Assay positive patients and 94% for Metastatic Assay negative patients [HR = 3.21 (1.35–7.67); P = 0.003]. On multivariable analysis the Metastatic Assay remained predictive for development of distant metastases [HR = 2.71 (1.11–6.63); P = 0.030]. The assay retained independent prognostic performance for MFS when assessed with the Cancer of the Prostate Assessment Score (CAPRA) [HR = 3.23 (1.22–8.59); P = 0.019] whilst CAPRA itself was not significant [HR = 1.88, (0.52–6.77); P = 0.332]. A high concordance [100% (61.5–100)] for the assay result was noted between two separate foci taken from 11 tumours, whilst Gleason score had low concordance.ConclusionsThe Metastatic Assay demonstrated significant prognostic performance in patients treated with radical radiotherapy both alone and independent of standard clinical and pathological variables. The Metastatic Assay could have clinical utility when deciding upon treatment intensification in high-risk patients. Genomic and clinical data are available as a public resource.
Consistent with several other European studies, IgA nephropathy was the most common primary glomerular disease in this UK region. The diagnosis of FSGS was uncommon with no evidence of a rise in incidence.
Dense deposit disease is a rare glomerulonephritis caused by uncontrolled stimulation of the alternative complement pathway. Allograft survival after kidney transplantation is significantly reduced by the high rate of disease recurrence. No therapeutic interventions have consistently improved outcomes for patients with primary or recurrent disease. This is the first reported case of recurrent dense deposit disease being managed with eculizumab. Within 4 weeks of renal transplantation, deteriorating graft function and increasing proteinuria were evident. A transplant biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of recurrent dense deposit disease. Eculizumab was considered after the failure of corticosteroid, rituximab and plasmapheresis to attenuate the rate of decline in allograft function. There was a marked clinical and biochemical response following the administration of eculizumab. This case provides the first evidence that eculizumab may have a place in the management of crescentic dense deposit disease. More information is necessary to clarify the effectiveness and role of eculizumab in dense deposit disease but the response in this patient was encouraging. The results of clinical trials of eculizumab in this condition are eagerly awaited. Key words: Dense deposit disease, eculizumab, kidney transplantAbbreviations: aHUS, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; ACR, albumin:creatinine ratio; C3NF, complement factor 3 nephritic factor; C3, complement factor 3; C4, complement factor 4; C5, complement factor 5; DDD, dense deposit disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; fB, complement factor B; fD, complement factor D; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; MAC, membrane attack complex; MPGN II, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; UNOS, United Network for Organ Sharing.
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal forms of cancer with a 10-year survival of <1%. With little improvement in survival rates observed in the past 40 years, there is a significant need for new treatments or more effective strategies to deliver existing treatments. The antimetabolite gemcitabine (Gem) is the most widely used form of chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer treatment, but is known to produce significant side effects when administered systemically. We have previously demonstrated the benefit of combined chemo-sonodynamic therapy (SDT), delivered using oxygen carrying microbubbles (OMB), as a targeted treatment for pancreatic cancer in a murine model of the disease. In this manuscript, we report the preparation of a biotin functionalised Gem ligand for attachment to OMBs (OMB-Gem). We demonstrate the effectiveness of chemo-sonodynamic therapy following ultrasound-targeted-microbubble-destruction (UTMD) of the OMB-Gem and a Rose Bengal loaded OMB (OMB-RB) as a targeted treatment for pancreatic cancer. Specifically, UTMD using the OMB-Gem and OMB-RB conjugates reduced the viability of MIA PaCa-2, PANC-1, BxPC3 and T110299 pancreatic cancer cells by >60% (p < 0.001) and provided significant tumour growth delay (>80%, p < 0.001) compared to untreated animals when human xenograft MIA PaCa-2 tumours were treated in SCID mice. The toxicity of the OMB-Gem conjugate was also determined in healthy non-tumour bearing MF1 mice and revealed no evidence of renal or hepatic damage. Therefore, the results presented in this manuscript suggest that chemo-sonodynamic therapy using the OMB-Gem and OMB-RB conjugates, is potentially an effective targeted and safe treatment modality for pancreatic cancer.
BACKGROUND:We appraised 23 biomarkers previously associated with urothelial cancer in a case-control study. Our aim was to determine whether single biomarkers and/or multivariate algorithms significantly improved on the predictive power of an algorithm based on demographics for prediction of urothelial cancer in patients presenting with hematuria. METHODS: Twenty-two biomarkers in urine and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in serum were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and biochip array technology in 2 patient cohorts: 80 patients with urothelial cancer, and 77 controls with confounding pathologies. We used Forward Wald binary logistic regression analyses to create algorithms based on demographic variables designated prior predicted probability (PPP) and multivariate algorithms, which included PPP as a single variable. Areas under the curve (AUC) were determined after receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis for single biomarkers and algorithms. RESULTS: After univariate analysis, 9 biomarkers were differentially expressed (t test; P < .05). CEA AUC 0.74; bladder tumor antigen (BTA) AUC 0.74; and nuclear matrix protein (NMP22) 0.79. PPP included age and smoking years; AUC 0.76. An algorithm including PPP, NMP22, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) significantly improved AUC to 0.90 when compared with PPP. The algorithm including PPP, BTA, CEA, and thrombomodulin (TM) increased AUC to 0.86. Sensitivities ¼ 91%, 91%; and specificities ¼ 80%, 71%, respectively, for the algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of biomarkers representing diverse carcinogenic pathways can significantly impact on the ROC statistic based on demographics. Benign prostate hyperplasia was a significant confounding pathology and identification of nonmuscle invasive urothelial cancer remains a challenge. Cancer 2012;118:2641
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.