The 21-gene Recurrence Score® (RS) assay is a validated prognostic/predictive tool in ER + early-stage breast cancer. However, clinical outcome data from prospective studies in RS ≥ 11 patients are lacking, as are relevant real-life clinical practice data. In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry, we evaluated treatments/clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RS-testing through Clalit Health Services. The analysis included N0 ER + HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were RS-tested from 1/2006 through 12/2010. Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. The cohort included 1801 patients (median follow-up, 6.2 years). Median age was 60 years, 50.4% were grade 2 and 81.1% had invasive ductal carcinoma; 48.9% had RS < 18, 40.7% RS 18–30, and 10.4% RS ≥ 31, with chemotherapy use of 1.4, 23.7, and 87.2%, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 0.8, 3.0, and 8.6%, for patients with RS < 18, RS 18–30 and RS ≥ 31, respectively; the corresponding 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for breast cancer death were 0.0, 0.9, and 6.2%. Chemotherapy-untreated patients with RS < 11 (n = 304) and 11–25 (n = 1037) (TAILORx categorization) had 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence risk/breast cancer death of 1.0%/0.0% and 1.3%/0.4%, respectively. Our results extend those of the prospective TAILORx trial: the 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence and breast cancer death rate for the RS < 18 patients were very low supporting the use of endocrine therapy alone. Furthermore, in chemotherapy-untreated patients with RS 11–25 (where TAILORx patients were randomized to chemoendocrine or endocrine therapy alone), 5-year distant recurrence rates were also very low, suggesting that chemotherapy would not have conferred clinically meaningful benefit.

The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18–30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18–30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2–3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18–30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1–3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18.

Purpose Limited data exist on the molecular biology, treatment, and outcomes of breast cancer in men, and much of our understanding in this area remains largely an extrapolation from data in women with breast cancer. Materials and Methods We studied men and women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score (RS) results. Differences in clinical characteristics and gene expression were determined, and distribution of RS results was correlated with 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival. Results There were 3,806 men and 571,115 women. Men were older than women (mean age, 64.2 v 59.1 years; P < .001). RS < 18 predominated in both genders, but RS ≥ 31 was more frequent in men (12.4% v 7.4%; P < .001), as were very low scores (RS < 11; 33.8% v 22.1%; P < .001). Mean gene expression was higher in men for the estrogen receptor (ER), proliferation, and invasion groups. ER was lowest and progesterone receptor was highest in women younger than 50 years of age, with a progressive increase in ER with age. Men younger than 50 years of age had slightly lower ER and progesterone receptor compared with older men. Survival data were available from SEER for 322 men and 55,842 women. Five-year BCSS was 99.0% (95% CI, 99.3% to 99.9%) and 95.9% (95% CI, 87.6% to 98.7%) for men with RS < 18 and RS 18-30, respectively, and for women, it was 99.5% (95% CI, 99.4% to 99.6%) and 98.6% (95% CI, 98.4% to 98.8%), respectively. RS ≥ 31 was associated with an 81.0% 5-year BCSS in men (95% CI, 53.3% to 93.2%) and 94.9% 5-year BCSS (95% CI, 93.9% to 95.7%) in women. Five-year BCSS and overall survival were lower in men than in women. Conclusion This study reveals some distinctive biologic features of breast cancer in men and an important prognostic role for RS testing in both men and women.

RS distribution among N0, N1mi, and N+ patients is similar, suggesting a spectrum of biology and potential chemotherapy benefit exists among node-negative and node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. If RxPONDER does not show a chemotherapy benefit in N+ patients with a low RS result, our findings indicate that substantial numbers of patients could be spared the burden of chemotherapy.

The prostate score assay result is an independent predictor of adverse pathology findings in patients who were diagnosed with very low, low or intermediate risk prostate cancer in the setting of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion prostate biopsy. This assay can be useful as an independent technology or an adjunct technology to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to individualize risk stratification of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer has the potential to improve surgical therapeutic outcomes without sacrificing the survival advantages of adjuvant therapy. However, determining whether ER+ patients (pts) will respond to neoadjuvant (NA) chemotherapy (CT) or hormone therapy (HT) can be difficult. Not all ER+ pts respond to NACT, while response to NAHT can vary across ER+ pts. Thus, the ability to select pts more likely to benefit from NAHT would represent progress in clinical management of breast cancer. NEOS is a randomized phase III study assessinglong-term prognosis of ER+ primary breast cancer with/without adjuvant CT following NAHT (UMIN 000001090, http://www.umin.ac.jp/). We used archived core biopsy tumor samples from the NEOS study to validate the RS result as a predictor of clinical response and its association with successful breast conserving surgery (BCS) in pts treated with 6 months of NAHT. Methods: NEOS enrolled 904 postmenopausal pts with ER+, HER2-, clinically node negative (cN0) breast cancer to evaluate whether adjuvant CT was necessary for pts who responded to NAHT. In this current study, we enrolled pts with tumors ≥2cm from the NEOS study. Biopsy samples of 333 pts were assessed for the Oncotype DX assay. Response to NAHT was recorded as complete/partial response (CR/PR), or stable/progressive disease (SD/PD). Primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate clinical response (CR/PR) to NA letrozole between pts with low (&lt;18) and high (≥31) RS result. Secondary endpoints include evaluating the relationships between clinical response and continuous RS results, and other covariates including age, tumor size, grade, Ki67 by IHC, ER and PR single gene scores, and ER and proliferation gene group scores by RT-PCR. Results: The analysis included 294 pts with median age of 63 yrs, median tumor size of 25mm, and 66% were nuclear grade 1. 156 (53.0%), 83 (28.6%) and 54(18.4%) cases were low, intermediate, and high RS groups by Oncotype DX, respectively. Six (2%), 126 (42.8%), 149 (50.3%), 13 (4.4%) cases experienced CR, PR, SD, PD as clinical response, respectively, similar to that of all NEOS pts. Clinical response rate was 54%, 42% and 22% in low, intermediate, and high RS groups, respectively. The proportion of pts with clinical response was significantly higher in the low RS group vs the high RS group (p&lt;0.001). In univariate analyses, continuous RS was significantly associated with clinical response (p&lt;0.001), along with ER (p=.02), PR (p&lt;0.001), and ER gene group score (p&lt;0.001). Other covariates were not associated with clinical response. Conclusion: The Oncotype DX RS test in core biopsy samples is validated as a predictive assay for clinical response of NAHT in postmenopausal, ER+/HER2-, cN0, primary early breast cancer pts. Further results on the association of RS results with BCS outcomes following NAHT will be presented. These results when combined with previously published data on RS in NACT studies help guide pts with ER+, HER2- breast cancer with NAHT vs NACT treatment options to maximize clinical response. Citation Format: Yamamoto Y, Iwata H, Masuda N, Fujisawa T, Toyama T, Kashiwaba M, Ohtani S, Taira N, Sakai T, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura R, Akabane H, Shibahara Y, Sasano H, Yamaguchi T, Sakamaki K, Chao C, McCullough D, Sugiyama N, Ohashi Y. TransNEOS: Validation of the oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) testing core needle biopsy samples from NEOS as predictor of clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-03.

No abstract

Introduction: The Recurrence Score® (RS) assay was shown in SWOG 8814 to predict chemotherapy (CT) benefit for patients (pts) with N+ BC and RS ≥31 but not RS &lt;18. As we await the randomized RxPONDER results for RS 0-25, we characterized BCSM for RS groups (cutoffs of 11, 18, 25, and 31) in the large population-based SEER study of pts treated based on RS results. Methods: RS results were provided electronically to SEER registries per their linkage methods (Petkov npj Breast Cancer 2016). Eligible pts were diagnosed (Jan 2004 - Dec 2012) with N+ (micrometastases, 1-3 positive nodes), HR+, HER2-negative BC, and had no prior malignancy or multiple tumors. BCSM estimates by reported CT use were computed using standard cutpoints of 18 and 31 and TAILORx/RxPONDER cutpoints of 11 and 25, and should be interpreted cautiously given known under-reporting of CT use to SEER and lack of randomization. Results: Among 6,483 pts with RS results, 1,312 (20%) had RS &lt;11, 2,478 (38%) had RS 11-17, 1,831 (28%) had RS 18-25, 432 (7%) had RS 26-30, and 430 (7%) had RS ≥31. There was a significant association between RS results and BCSM (p&lt;0.001) without and with adjustment for age, tumor size, and grade. Reported CT use and 5-y BCSM increased with increasing RS result (Table). For pts with RS &lt;11 and RS 11-17, CT use was reported in approximately a quarter of pts, and 5-y BCSM was low regardless of CT use. For pts with RS 18-25, CT use was more common and the 5-y BCSM was about 2%. For pts with RS of 26-30 or ≥31, CT was common, and higher 5-y BCSM was observed. 5-y BCSM, by RS Group and Reported CT Use CT reported as ‘No/Unknown’CT reported as ‘Yes’RS groupN (%)5-y BCSM (95% CI)N (%)5-y BCSM (95% CI)&lt;111066 (81%)1.8% (0.7%, 4.6%)246 (19%)1.3% (0.3%, 5.3%)11-171869 (75%)0.5% (0.2%, 1.1%)609 (25%)2.3% (0.9%, 5.8%)18-251034 (56%)2.0% (1.0%, 3.9%)797 (44%)1.9% (0.8%, 4.5%)26-30144 (33%)7.7% (2.8%, 20.3%)288 (67%)4.0% (1.6%, 10.1%)≥3199 (23%)11.9% (5.3%, 25.6%)331 (77%)11.1% (6.9%, 17.6%) Conclusion: Reported CT use and 5-y BCSM in N+ BC increased with increasing RS results in “real-world” clinical practice. 5-y BCSM with RS &lt;18 was less than 2% in pts with no or unknown CT use. 5-y BCSM in pts treated based on RS results appears to increase considerably with RS &gt;25. Citation Format: Shak S, McCullough D, Petkov VI. Breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) in patients with node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) treated based on the 21-gene assay in clinical practice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-03.