The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18–30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18–30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2–3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18–30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1–3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18.

The prognosis of locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach is poor. In an attempt to improve therapeutic results, we undertook a phase II trial to investigate a combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide, all active drugs in this malignancy and with a synergistic effect in combination. Fourteen patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 iv, carboplatin AUC-6 iv on d 1, and oral etoposide 50 mg/d alternating with 100 mg/d on d 1-10. Cycles were repeated every 3 wk. Of the 14 patients treated, partial response was observed in 3/12 (25%) evaluable patients. Median survival for the entire group was 7 mo. The treatment was associated with severe myelotoxicity. Neutropenic fever that required hospitalization developed in 7/14 (50%) of patients, and symptomatic anemia that required red blood cell transfusion was noted in 8/14 (57%). There was one drug-related death associated with neutropenic fever, Gram negative sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Nonhematological toxicity was moderate. We conclude that the current regimen of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide is not recommended in advanced gastric carcinoma owing to unacceptable myelotoxicity.

No abstract