Purpose The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of workplace-based return-to-work (RTW) interventions and work disability management (DM) interventions that assist workers with musculoskeletal (MSK) and pain-related conditions and mental health (MH) conditions with RTW. Methods We followed a systematic review process developed by the Institute for Work & Health and an adapted best evidence synthesis that ranked evidence as strong, moderate, limited, or insufficient. Results Seven electronic databases were searched from January 1990 until April 2015, yielding 8898 non-duplicate references. Evidence from 36 medium and high quality studies were synthesized on 12 different intervention categories across three broad domains: health-focused, service coordination, and work modification interventions. There was strong evidence that duration away from work from both MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions were significantly reduced by multi-domain interventions encompassing at least two of the three domains. There was moderate evidence that these multi-domain interventions had a positive impact on cost outcomes. There was strong evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy interventions that do not also include workplace modifications or service coordination components are not effective in helping workers with MH conditions in RTW. Evidence for the effectiveness of other single-domain interventions was mixed, with some studies reporting positive effects and others reporting no effects on lost time and work functioning. Conclusions While there is substantial research literature focused on RTW, there are only a small number of quality workplace-based RTW intervention studies that involve workers with MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions. We recommend implementing multi-domain interventions (i.e. with healthcare provision, service coordination, and work accommodation components) to help reduce lost time for MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions. Practitioners should also consider implementing these programs to help improve work functioning and reduce costs associated with work disability.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9690-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
CEGT is a useful adjuvant psychological therapy for women with early stage breast cancer. Interaction effects between group members and therapists are relevant to outcome. Group-as-a-whole effects are powerful, but the training and experience of the therapist is especially critical to an efficacious outcome.
Family focused grief therapy has the potential to prevent pathological grief. Benefit is clear for intermediate and sullen families. Care is needed to avoid increasing conflict in hostile families.
An empirical study of 102 families of palliative care patients was undertaken to identify the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family members. Beck Depression Inventory‐derived caseness was identified in one‐half of patients, one‐third of spouses and one‐quarter of offspring, suggesting that psychological distress reverberates substantially throughout the nuclear family. Anger was significantly more common in the offspring, who perceived their families to have poorer communication, cohesion and more conflict than their parents, suggesting that information about the illness may not be adequately transmitted to them. The family as a group is the most appropriate recipient of care, and family meetings are advocated to promote communication, support and mutual understanding.
Family Focused Grief Therapy (FFGT) is a new model of brief intervention, which is commenced during palliative care for those families shown to be at high risk of poor adaptation, and continued preventively into bereavement with the aim of improving family functioning and reducing the morbid consequences of grief. In this paper, baseline data on 81 families (363 individuals) selected by screening from a palliative care population are explored to confirm our previously reported observation that high levels of psychosocial morbidity are positively associated with worsening family dysfunction. The Family Relationships Index (FRI) was used for screening and the Family Assessment Device (FAD) as an independent family outcome measure. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) were the psychosocial measures. Families were classified according to their functioning based on the FRI. To allow for correlated family data, statistical analyses employed the generalized estimating equation (GEE) method, controlling for gender and depression (BDI). Screening of 257 families (701 individuals) revealed 74 (29%) well-functioning families and 183 (71%) at some risk of morbid outcome. Of the latter, 81 (44%) gave informed consent to enter a randomized controlled trial of FFGT. Patients had a mean age of 57 years, 51% were male and they suffered from cancer, with a median length of illness from diagnosis to death of 25 months. In accordance with the FFGT model, their family types were identified as Intermediate 51%, Sullen 26% and Hostile 23%. These were significantly associated with steadily increasing levels of distress (BSI) and poor social adjustment (SAS). The FAD confirmed the concurrent accuracy of the FRI. As significantly greater levels of psychosocial morbidity were present in families whose functioning as a group was poorer, support was generated for a clinical approach that screens for families rather than individuals at high risk. The predictive validity of the FRI as a screening measure was confirmed. Overall, these baseline data point to the importance of a family-centred model of care.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of psychological morbidity and describe quality of life in women with early‐stage breast cancer.
Design: Cross‐sectional descriptive study (3 months after conservative breast surgery or mastectomy) of patients from nine general hospitals in Melbourne, Victoria, October 1994 to March 1997.
Participants: 303 women with early‐stage breast cancer entering a randomised trial of adjuvant psychological group therapy; mean age, 46 years (SD, 8).
Main outcome measures: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health (DSM)‐IV psychiatric diagnoses generated by the Monash Interview for Liaison Psychiatry; quality‐of‐life data based on the the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality‐of‐life questionnaire (QLQ)‐C30 (core) and QLQ BR23 (breast module) instruments.
Results: 45% of the women (135/303) had a psychiatric disorder; 42% (127) of the sample had depression or anxiety, or both; there was minor depression in 82 (27.1%), an anxiety disorder in 26 (8.6%), major depression in 29 (9.6%) and a phobic disorder in 21 (6.9%). 20% of women (61) had more than one disorder. On quality‐of‐life measures nearly one‐third of the women felt less attractive and most had lost interest in sexual activity. There was substantial distress about hair loss. Symptoms of lymphoedema were described by 13 women (4.3%). Breast conservation surgery was associated with a better body image (P<0.01).
Conclusion: Women recently diagnosed with early‐stage breast cancer have high rates of psychiatric and psychological disturbance. Quality of life is substantially affected. Clinicians should actively explore their patients' psychological adjustment to enable early recognition and treatment of these disorders.
Women with advanced breast cancer have high rates of psychiatric and psychological disturbance. Quality of life is substantially affected. Clinicians need to be vigilant in monitoring psychological adjustment as part of a comprehensive biopsychosocial approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.