When bacterial cells come in contact, antagonism mediated by the delivery of toxins frequently ensues. The potential for such encounters to have long-term beneficial consequences in recipient cells has not been investigated. Here, we examined the effects of intoxication by DddA, a cytosine deaminase delivered via the type VI secretion system (T6SS) of Burkholderia cenocepacia. Despite its killing potential, we observed that several bacterial species resist DddA and instead accumulate mutations. These mutations can lead to the acquisition of antibiotic resistance, indicating that even in the absence of killing, interbacterial antagonism can have profound consequences on target populations. Investigation of additional toxins from the deaminase superfamily revealed that mutagenic activity is a common feature of these proteins, including a representative we show targets single-stranded DNA and displays a markedly divergent structure. Our findings suggest that a surprising consequence of antagonistic interactions between bacteria could be the promotion of adaptation via the action of directly mutagenic toxins.
An important step towards understanding the mechanistic basis of the central dogma is the quantitative characterization of the dynamics of nucleic-acid-bound molecular motors in the context of the living cell. To capture these dynamics, we develop lag-time analysis, a method for measuring in vivo dynamics. Using this approach, we provide quantitative locus-specific measurements of fork velocity, in units of kilobases per second, as well as replisome pause durations, some with the precision of seconds. The measured fork velocity is observed to be both locus and time dependent, even in wild-type cells. In this work, we quantitatively characterize known phenomena, detect brief, locus-specific pauses at ribosomal DNA loci in wild-type cells, and observe temporal fork velocity oscillations in three highly-divergent bacterial species.
An important step towards understanding the replication process in the context of the cell is the quantitative characterization of replication dynamics, including the rate of replication fork progression (i.e. fork velocity) with genomic and temporal specificity in vivo. In this paper, we develop a novel method, lag-time analysis, for measuring replisome dynamics using next-generation sequencing. We provide the first quantitative locus-specific measurements of fork velocity. The measured velocity is observed to be both locus and time dependent, even in wild-type cells. To benchmark the approach, we analyze replication dynamics in three different species and a collection of mutants which facilitate the quantitative characterization of replication-conflict-induced fork slowdowns as well as a host of other replication dynamics phenomena, including the observation of temporal fork velocity oscillation. With increases in sequencing depth and improvements in sample preparation, the approach has the potential to provide new insights at higher genomic resolution and in a wide range of biological systems.
Two powerful and complementary experimental approaches are commonly used to study the cell cycle and cell biology: One class of experiments characterizes the statistics (or demographics) of an unsynchronized exponentially-growing population, while the other captures cell cycle dynamics, either by time-lapse imaging of full cell cycles or in bulk experiments on synchronized populations. In this paper, we study the subtle relationship between observations in these two distinct experimental approaches. We begin with an existing model: a single-cell deterministic description of cell cycle dynamics where cell states (i.e. periods or phases) have precise lifetimes. We then generalize this description to a stochastic model in which the states have stochastic lifetimes, as described by arbitrary probability distribution functions. Our analyses of the demographics of an exponential culture reveal a simple and exact correspondence between the deterministic and stochastic models: The corresponding state lifetimes in the deterministic model are equal to the exponential mean of the lifetimes in the stochastic model. An important implication is therefore that the demographics of an exponential culture will be well-fit by a deterministic model even if the state timing is stochastic. Although we explore the implications of the models in the context of the Escherichia coli cell cycle, we expect both the models as well as the significance of the exponential-mean lifetimes to find many applications in the quantitative analysis of cell cycle dynamics in other biological systems.
The inherent stochasticity of cellular processes leads to significant cell-to-cell variation in protein abundance. Although this noise has already been characterized and modeled, its broader implications and significance remain unclear. In this paper, we revisit the noise model and identify the number of messages transcribed per cell cycle as the critical determinant of noise. In yeast, we demonstrate that this quantity predicts the non-canonical scaling of noise with protein abundance, as well as quantitatively predicting its magnitude. We then hypothesize that growth robustness requires an upper ceiling on noise for the expression of essential genes, corresponding to a lower floor on the transcription level. We show that just such a floor exists: a minimum transcription level of one message per cell cycle is conserved between three model organisms: Escherichia coli, yeast, and human. Furthermore, all three organisms transcribe the same number of messages per gene, per cell cycle. This common transcriptional program reveals that robustness to noise plays a central role in determining the expression level of a large fraction of essential genes, and that this fundamental optimal strategy is conserved from E. coli to human cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.