Background and purpose: In patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with reperfusion therapy we aimed to evaluate whether pretreatment blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage is associated with subsequent hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Methods:We prospectively screened patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment. Before treatment, each patient received computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and CT perfusion. We assessed pretreatment BBB leakage within the ischemic area using the volume transfer constant (K trans ) value. Our primary outcome was relevant HT, defined as hemorrhagic infarction type 2 or parenchymal hemorrhage type 1 or 2. We evaluated independent associations between BBB leakage and HT using logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6, treatment type, and onset-to-treatment time. Results:We enrolled 171 patients with available assessment of BBB leakage. The patients' mean (±SD) age was 75.5 (±11.8) years, 86 (50%) were men, and the median (interquartile range) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (12-23). A total of 32 patients (18%) received intravenous thrombolysis, 102 (60%) underwent direct endovascular treatment, and 37 (22%) underwent both. Patients with relevant HT (N = 31;18%) had greater mean BBB leakage (K trans 0.77 vs. 0.60; p = 0.027). After adjustment in the logistic regression model, we found that BBB leakage was associated both with a more than twofold risk of relevant HT (odds ratio [OR] 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-6.03 per K trans point increase; OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.06-5.17 for K trans values > 0.63 [mean BBB leakage value]) and with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 4.30; 95% CI 1.13-13.77 per K trans point increase). Conclusion:Pretreatment BBB leakage before reperfusion therapy was associated with HT, and may help to identify patients at risk of HT.
Meningiomas account for up to 20 % of all primary intracranial neoplasms; although the majority of these have a benign course, as many as 5-10 % can display more aggressive behavior and a higher incidence of disease progression. The benefit of immediate adjuvant radiotherapy is still being debated for atypical and malignant meningiomas. This study aimed to retrospectively assess prognostic factors and outcome in 68 patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas. Sixty-eight meningioma patients were treated with radiotherapy after initial resection or for recurrence, between January 1993 and December 2011. Surgery was macroscopically complete in 80 % of the patients; histology was atypical and malignant in 51 patients and 17 patients, respectively. Mean dose of radiotherapy was 54.6 Gy. Fifty-six percent of all patients received radiotherapy after surgical resection, 26 % at the first relapse, and 18 % at the second relapse. Median follow-up was 6.7 years, (range 1.5-19.9 years). The 5- and 10-year actuarial overall survival (OS) rates were 74.1 and 45.6 %, respectively. At univariate analysis age >60 years, radiotherapy dose >52 Gy showed statistical significance, (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). At the multivariate analysis radiotherapy dose >52 Gy maintained the statistical significance, (p = 0.037). OS of patients treated with radiotherapy at diagnosis was longer than the survival of patients treated with salvage radiotherapy; however this difference did not reach statistical significance when tested for the entire series or for the subgroups of grade 2 and grade 3 patients. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 76.5 and 69.5 %, respectively, and were significantly influenced by size >5 cm (p = 0.04) and grading (p = 0.003) on univariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, size and grading both remained significant prognostic factors, p = 0.044 and p = 0.0006, respectively. Grade ≤ 2 acute side effects were seen during radiotherapy treatment in 16 % of the patients, with no ≥ grade 3 acute toxicity, based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. In this mono-institutional retrospective study, age and radiotherapy dose were associated with a longer OS, while preoperative size and grading of the tumor influenced DFS. Although there were some advantages in terms of OS for patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy, the benefit did not reach the significance. Multicenter prospective studies are necessary to clarify the management and the correct timing of radiotherapy in such a rare disease.
Purpose Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is considered a major risk factor for fatal outcome in COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the possible association between computed tomography (CT) signs of chronic CVD and mortality in infected patients. Materials and methods We performed a double-blind retrospective evaluation of the cerebral CT scans of 83 COVID-19 patients looking for CT signs of chronic CVD. We developed a rapid visual score, named CVD-CT, which summarized the possible presence of parietal calcifications and dolichosis, with or without ectasia, of intracranial arteries, areas of chronic infarction and leukoaraiosis. Statistical analysis was carried out with weighted Cohen’s K test for inter-reader agreement and logistic regression to evaluate the association of in-hospital mortality with CVD-CT, chest X-ray (CXR) severity score (Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema-RALE) for radiological assessment of pulmonary disease, sex and age. Results CVD-CT (odds ratio 1.6, 95% C.I. 1.2-2.1, p = 0.001) was associated with increased risk of mortality. RALE showed an almost significant association (odds ratio 1.05, 95% C.I. 1-1.1, p 0.06), whereas age and sex did not. Conclusion CVD-CT is associated with risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients. The presence of CT signs of chronic CVD may be correlated to a condition of fragility of the circulatory system, which constitutes a key risk factor for death in infected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.