BackgroundAlthough Hodgkin's lymphoma is a highly curable disease with modern chemotherapy protocols, some patients are primary refractory or relapse after first-line chemotherapy or even after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. We investigated the potential role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this setting. Design and MethodsIn this phase II study 92 patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma and an HLA-identical sibling, a matched unrelated donor or a one antigen mismatched, unrelated donor were treated with salvage chemotherapy followed by reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation. Fourteen patients showed refractory disease and died from progressive lymphoma with a median overall survival after trial entry of 10 months (range, 6-17). Seventy-eight patients proceeded to allograft (unrelated donors, n=23). Fifty were allografted in complete or partial remission and 28 in stable disease. Fludarabine (150 mg/m 2 iv) and melphalan (140 mg/m 2 iv) were used as the conditioning regimen. Anti-thymocyte globulin was additionally used as graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis for recipients of grafts from unrelated donors. ResultsThe non-relapse mortality rate was 8% at 100 days and 15% at 1 year. Relapse was the major cause of failure. The progression-free survival rate was 47% at 1 year and 18% at 4 years from trial entry. For the allografted population, the progression-free survival rate was 48% at 1 year and 24% at 4 years. Chronic graft-versus-host disease was associated with a lower incidence of relapse. Patients allografted in complete remission had a significantly better outcome. The overall survival rate was 71% at 1 year and 43% at 4 years. ConclusionsAllogeneic stem cell transplantation can result in long-term progression-free survival in heavily pre-treated patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. The reduced intensity conditioning approach significantly reduced non-relapse mortality; the high relapse rate represents the major remaining challenge in this setting. Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Haematologica 2012;97(2):310-317. doi:10.3324/haematol.2011 . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Results of the HDR-ALLO study -a prospective clinical trial by the Grupo Español de Linfomas/ Trasplante de Médula Osea (GEL/TAMO) and the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for

Our results confirm the capacity of this RIC regimen to obtain long-term remissions in patients ineligible for a conventional allo-SCT. The results suggest an important role of the development of chronic GVHD in reducing relapse and improving DFS and OS.

SummaryThe graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) characteristics of 150 consecutive patients undergoing reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic (allo‐RIC) transplants and 88 patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen were analysed. All patients received the same GVHD prophylaxis and peripheral blood stem cells from a human leucocyte antigen identical sibling. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 67% and 44% in the myeloablative and allo‐RIC regimen groups, respectively (P < 0·001), and was 39% vs. 29%, respectively (P = 0·043), for grades 2–4 aGVHD. Only conditioning type (myeloablative versus allo‐RIC) significantly influenced the incidence of aGVHD in multivariate analysis: Hazard ratio (HR) = 2·16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1·52–3·07], P < 0·0001. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 63% and 71% among myeloablative and allo‐RIC patients respectively (P = 0·084). This trend was because of the higher incidence of limited cGVHD, but not extensive cGVHD among allo‐RIC recipients [HR = 3·3 (95% CI: 1·42–8·08), P = 0·0017]. Moreover, among patients who developed cGVHD, the cumulative incidence of limited cGVHD was significantly lower in the myeloablative group than in the allo‐RIC group (7% vs. 25%, P = 0·007). Duration of immunosuppression was shorter among allo‐RIC patients (35·5% vs. 68·8% required systemic immunosuppression 36 months after transplant, P = 0·028). Although prospective controlled trials are required to further evaluate the effect of the conditioning regimen on GVHD, our results suggest that RIC modifies the incidence and characteristics of both acute and cGVHD after allogeneic transplantation, and decreases the immunosuppression requirements in long‐term follow up when compared with myeloablative conditioning.

The benefit of azacitidine treatment in survival of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients compared with conventional care treatment (CCT) has not been established outside clinical trials. To assess its effectiveness, we compared overall survival (OS) between azacitidine and conventional treatment (CCT) in high-risk MDS patients, excluding those undergoing stem cell transplantation, submitted to the Spanish MDS registry from 2000 to 2013. Several Cox regression and competing risk models, considering azacitidine as a time-dependent covariate, were used to assess survival and acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) progression. Among 821 patients included, 251 received azacitidine. Median survival was 13.4 (11.8-16) months for azacitidine-treated patients and 12.2 (11-14.1) for patients under CCT (P=0.41). In a multivariate model, age, International prognostic scoring system and lactate dehydrogenase were predictors of OS whereas azacitidine was not (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.35, P=0.49). However, in patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities, a trend toward a better survival was observed in azacitidine-treated patients (median survival 13.3 (11-18) months) compared with CCT (median survival 8.6 (5-10.4) months, P=0.08). In conclusion, our data show that, in spite of a widespread use of azacitidine, there is a lack of improvement in survival over the years. Identification of predicting factors of response and survival is mandatory.

Purpose To develop a system prognostic of outcome in those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo HCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients and Methods We examined 2,133 patients with MDS undergoing HLA-matched (n = 1,728) or -mismatched (n = 405) allo HCT from 2000 to 2012. We used a Cox multivariable model to identify factors prognostic of mortality in a training subset (n = 1,151) of the HLA-matched cohort. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to the remaining patients undergoing HLA-matched allo HCT (validation cohort; n = 577) as well as to patients undergoing HLA-mismatched allo HCT. Results Blood blasts greater than 3% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.85), platelets 50 × 109/L or less at transplantation (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.61), Karnofsky performance status less than 90% (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.28), comprehensive cytogenetic risk score of poor or very poor (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.80), and age 30 to 49 years (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.35) were associated with increased hazard of death and assigned 1 point in the scoring system. Monosomal karyotype (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.65 to 2.45) and age 50 years or older (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.83) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival after transplantation in patients with low (0 to 1 points), intermediate (2 to 3), high (4 to 5) and very high (≥ 6) scores was 71% (95% CI, 58% to 85%), 49% (95% CI, 42% to 56%), 41% (95% CI, 31% to 51%), and 25% (95% CI, 4% to 46%), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased relapse (P < .001) and treatment-related mortality (P < .001) in the HLA-matched set and relapse (P < .001) in the HLA-mismatched cohort. Conclusion The proposed system is prognostic of outcome in patients undergoing HLA-matched and -mismatched allo HCT for MDS.

After accounting for karyotype complexity, MK was not associated with OS or evolution to AML. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the prognostic value of MK in MDS is not independent and is mainly the result of its strong association with number of chromosomal abnormalities.

We monitored 133 high-risk allo-SCT recipients for 6 months after transplant for EBV reactivation by quantitative real-time PCR. Rituximab was given as pre-emptive therapy for viremia 41000 copies/mL. The 1-year cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation was 29.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18-40) in patients monitored due to initial high-risk characteristics (n = 93) and 31.8% (95% CI: 19.7-44) in those followed because of the development of refractory GVHD (n = 40). Overall response rate to Rituximab was 83%. Nine patients (9.6%) developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) at a median of +62 days after SCT. Eight of them showed a concomitant CMV reactivation. Second SCT was the only risk factor associated with EBV infection and PTLD in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-6.4; P = 0.04) and HR 6.4 (95%CI: 1.3-32; P = 0.02)). The development of EBV reactivation was not associated with non-relapse mortality or OS (P = 0.97 and P = 0.84, respectively).Bone Marrow Transplantation (2015) 50, 579-584; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.298; published online 12 January 2015 INTRODUCTION Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication after SCT with a mortality as high as 85%. 1 Major risk factors for PTLD include HLA disparity, graft T-cell depletion and administration of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or other anti T-cell antibodies. 2,3 PTLD is usually preceded by a preclinical phase characterized by rising EBV copies in peripheral blood which can be quantified by polymerase-chain reaction (PCR). Recent guidelines recommend monitoring EBV viral load in high-risk allo-SCT recipients, according to the mentioned predisposing factors. 4 The real incidence and prognosis of EBV disease are difficult to evaluate due to differences in the PCR methods used to test EBV DNA, the quantitative PCR thresholds for therapeutic intervention and the diversity of criteria for defining high-risk patients. 5 Efforts to improve immune responses by reducing immunosuppressive drugs remain as one of the cornerstones of management but are not applicable to patients with active GVHD; 6,7 thus, eliminating B lymphocytes with the anti-CD20 monoclonal ab Rituximab is the most feasible treatment. 7 In the current study we compare the incidence and prognosis of EBV-related complications between patients with baseline highrisk characteristics for PTLD and patients affected by refractory GVHD, prospectively monitored for EBV DNAemia with early institution of Rituximab as pre-emptive therapy.

Summary:We have performed a prospective study to evaluate early chimerism and its kinetics after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation among 68 patients who received a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen with fludarabine plus melphalan (n ¼ 40) or busulphan (n ¼ 28). Chimerism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of short tandem repeats in unfractionated (UF) and/or fractionated nucleated cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood (PB). All of the patients showed initial donor engraftment and no patient presented primary or secondary graft failure. In UF samples, the probability of achieving stable complete donor chimerism (CDC) in PB within the first 6 months was 70% on day +30, 85% on day +100 and 95% on day +180. CDC in granulocytes was observed in nearly all cases from day +30 onwards. CDC in T cells, however, differed among melphalan and busulphan recipients during the first 3 months (100 vs 0% on day +30 and 93 vs 20% on day +90, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the only significant variable associated with the achievement of early CDC was having received more than two lines of chemotherapy pretransplant (Po0.02). No correlation was found between the rate of achieving early CDC and the occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or disease progression post-transplant. In multivariate analysis, the only variable that influenced the incidence of disease progression posttransplant was the development of chronic extensive GVHD (Po0.05). In conclusion, a state of CDC is readily obtained within the first 6 months after our RIC protocols. Donor myeloid engraftment occurs rapidly in all cases, while early T-cell CDC is more common in more immunosuppressed hosts and, perhaps, in melphalan recipients.