Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is one of the most promising emerging treatments for B-cell malignancies. Recently, two CAR T-cell products (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel) have been approved for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia; many other CART constructs are in research for both hematological and non-hematological diseases. Most of the patients receiving CART therapy will develop fever at some point after infusion, mainly due to cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The onset of CRS is often indistinguishable from an infection, which makes management of these patients challenging. In addition to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy and CAR T cells, the treatment of complications with corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab increases the risk of infection in these patients. Data regarding incidence, risk factors and prevention of infections in patients receiving CART cell therapy are scarce. To assist in patient care, a multidisciplinary team from hospitals designated by the Spanish Ministry of Health to perform CART therapy prepared these recommendations. We reviewed the literature on the incidence, risk factors, and management of infections in adult and pediatric patients receiving CART cell treatment. Recommendations cover different areas: monitoring and treatment of hypogammaglobulinemia, prevention, prophylaxis, and management of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections as well as vaccination prior and after CART cell therapy.

We monitored 133 high-risk allo-SCT recipients for 6 months after transplant for EBV reactivation by quantitative real-time PCR. Rituximab was given as pre-emptive therapy for viremia 41000 copies/mL. The 1-year cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation was 29.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18-40) in patients monitored due to initial high-risk characteristics (n = 93) and 31.8% (95% CI: 19.7-44) in those followed because of the development of refractory GVHD (n = 40). Overall response rate to Rituximab was 83%. Nine patients (9.6%) developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) at a median of +62 days after SCT. Eight of them showed a concomitant CMV reactivation. Second SCT was the only risk factor associated with EBV infection and PTLD in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-6.4; P = 0.04) and HR 6.4 (95%CI: 1.3-32; P = 0.02)). The development of EBV reactivation was not associated with non-relapse mortality or OS (P = 0.97 and P = 0.84, respectively).Bone Marrow Transplantation (2015) 50, 579-584; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.298; published online 12 January 2015 INTRODUCTION Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication after SCT with a mortality as high as 85%. 1 Major risk factors for PTLD include HLA disparity, graft T-cell depletion and administration of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or other anti T-cell antibodies. 2,3 PTLD is usually preceded by a preclinical phase characterized by rising EBV copies in peripheral blood which can be quantified by polymerase-chain reaction (PCR). Recent guidelines recommend monitoring EBV viral load in high-risk allo-SCT recipients, according to the mentioned predisposing factors. 4 The real incidence and prognosis of EBV disease are difficult to evaluate due to differences in the PCR methods used to test EBV DNA, the quantitative PCR thresholds for therapeutic intervention and the diversity of criteria for defining high-risk patients. 5 Efforts to improve immune responses by reducing immunosuppressive drugs remain as one of the cornerstones of management but are not applicable to patients with active GVHD; 6,7 thus, eliminating B lymphocytes with the anti-CD20 monoclonal ab Rituximab is the most feasible treatment. 7 In the current study we compare the incidence and prognosis of EBV-related complications between patients with baseline highrisk characteristics for PTLD and patients affected by refractory GVHD, prospectively monitored for EBV DNAemia with early institution of Rituximab as pre-emptive therapy.

Early T-cell precursor (ETP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), was first identified within cases of childhood T-ALL based on its unique immunophenotypic and genetic features of limited (early) T-cell differentiation associated with (some) myeloid and stem cell features. 1 Thus ETP-ALL blasts express CD7, dim CD5 (<75% positive cells), in the absence of CD1a and CD8, and positivity for ≥1 myeloid/stem cell related markers (i.e., CD34, CD13 or CD33). 1,2 In turn, ETP-ALL frequently shows myeloid-associated gene alterations such as FLT3, NRAS/KRAS, DNMT3A, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, 3,4 with lower frequencies of other T-ALL-associated mutations (e.g., NOTCH1 and CDKN2A/B gene mutations). 5,6 The World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification of ALL included ETP-ALL for the first time, as a provisional entity, 7 but it failed to establish robust diagnostic criteria. Thus, after the first immunophenotypic characterization of ETP-ALL by Coustan-Smith et al. 1 the proposed criteria did not allow identification of all ETP-ALL cases as detected by gene expression profiling. 2 In addition, the "partial CD5 expression" criterion had a negative impact on the reproducibility of ETP-ALL diagnoses because of the lack of standardization of the method used for its assessment. Because of this, Zuubier et al. proposed refined immunophenotypic criteria by excluding CD5 expression while adding negativity for CD4. 2 From the clinical point of view early studies based on limited numbers of pediatric patients indicated that ETP-ALL was associated with a very poor outcome. 1,8,9 More recent data, based on larger series of children treated with more intensive therapy, showed no significant differences in outcome for ETP-ALL vs. other T-ALL cases. 10 In contrast, limited data have been reported for adult ETP-ALL, with conflicting results. 11,12 In one study, adult ETP-ALL was associated with a worse prognosis following different frontline chemotherapy schedules. 11 The

Persistent thrombocytopenia is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Romiplostim and eltrombopag are the currently available thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), and some studies with very small numbers of cases have reported their potential efficacy in the allo-SCT setting. The present retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TPO-RAs in 86 patients with persistent thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT. Sixteen patients (19%) had isolated thrombocytopenia (PT), and 71 (82%) had secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). TPO-RA therapy was started at a median of 127 days (range, 27 to 1177 days) after allo-SCT. The median initial and maximum administered doses were 50 mg/day (range, 25 to 150 mg/ day) and 75 mg/day (range, 25 to 150 mg/day), respectively, for eltrombopag and 1 mg/kg (range, 1 to 7 mg/kg) and 5 mg/kg (range, 1 to 10 mg/kg), respectively, for romiplostin. The median platelet count before initiation of TPO-RA therapy was 14,000/mL (range, 1000 to 57,000/mL). Platelet recovery to 50,000/mL without transfusion support was achieved in 72% of patients at a median time of 66 days (range, 2 to 247 days). Eighty-one percent of the patients had a decreased number of megakaryocytes before treatment, showing a slower response to therapy (P = .011). The median duration of treatment was 62 days (range, 7 to 700 days). Grade 3-4 adverse events (hepatic and asthenia) were observed in only 2% of the patients. At last follow-up, 81% of patients had discontinued TPO-RAs and maintained response, and 71% were alive. To our knowledge, this is the largest series analyzing the use of TPO-RAs after allo-SCT reported to date. Our results support the efficacy and safety in this new setting. Further prospective trials are needed to increase the level of evidence and to identify predictors of response.

This study aimed to characterize the incidence, etiology and outcome of infectious episodes in patients with steroid refractory acute GvHD (SR-GvHD). The cohort included 127 adults treated with inolimomab (77%) or etanercept (23%) owing to acute 2-4 SR-GvHD, with a response rate of 43% on day +30 and a 4-year survival of 15%. The 1-year cumulative incidences of bacterial, CMV and invasive fungal infection were 74%, 65% and 14%, respectively. A high rate (37%) of enterococcal infections was observed. Twenty patients (15.7%) developed BK virus-hemorrhagic cystitis and five percent had an EBV reactivation with only one case of PTLD. One-third of long-term survivors developed pneumonia by a community respiratory virus and/or encapsulated bacteria, mostly associated with chronic GvHD. Infections were an important cause of non-relapse mortality, with a 4-year incidence of 46%. In multivariate analysis, use of rituximab in the 6 months before SCT (hazard ratio; HR 4.2; 95% confidence interval; CI 1.1-16.3), severe infection before SR-GvHD onset (HR 5.8; 95% CI 1.3-26.3) and a baseline C-reactive protein >15 UI/mL (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-8.5) were associated with infection-related mortality. High rates of opportunistic infections with remarkable mortality warrant further efforts to optimize long-term outcomes after SR-GvHD.

The need for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with high-risk (HR) features and adequate measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance remains unclear. The aim of the ALL-HR-11 trial was to evaluate the outcomes of HR Ph-neg adult ALL patients following chemotherapy or allo-HSCT administered based on end-induction and consolidation MRD levels. Patients aged 15-60 years (y) with HR-ALL in complete response (CR) and MRD levels (centrally assessed by 8-color flow cytometry) &lt;0.1% after induction and &lt;0.01% after early consolidation, were assigned to receive delayed consolidation and maintenance therapy up to 2y in CR. The remaining patients were allocated to allo-HSCT. CR was attained in 315/348 patients (91%), with MRD &lt;0.1% after induction in 220/289 patients (76%). By intention-to treat, 218 patients were assigned to chemotherapy and 106 to allo-HSCT. The 5-year (±95%CI) cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) probabilities for the whole series were 43%±7%, 49%±7% and 40±6%, respectively, with CIR and OS rates of 45±8% and 59±9% for patients assigned to chemotherapy and of 40±12% and 38±11% for those assigned to allo-HSCT, respectively. Our results show that avoiding allo-HSCT does not hamper the outcomes of HR Ph-neg adult ALL patients up to 60y with adequate MRD response after induction and consolidation. Better post-remission alternative therapies are especially needed for patients with poor MRD clearance. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01540812)

The outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with myeloid malignancies is better in those without minimal residual disease (MRD) than in those with MRD+, as assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry (MPFC). WT1 quantitation also has been used to assess the probability of relapse in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) treated with chemotherapy. We analyzed the clinical value of normalized bone marrow WT1 levels as a measure of the expanded myeloid progenitor compartment in a consecutive series of 193 adult patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent HCT. Bone marrow WT1 levels before the HCT, at the first bone marrow aspirate after infusion, and in the follow-up samples after HCT were determined by means of real-time PCR using the European LeukemiaNet normalized method. We sought to clarify the prognostic relevance in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Based on earlier experience in AML, we selected a threshold of 100 copies, defining 2 groups: patients with <100 WT1 copies and those with ≥100 copies. Patients with <100 WT1 copies before HCT (median time, 36 days; range, 4 to 268 days) had a better OS, PFS, and CIR than those with ≥100 copies (40 ± 1 versus 29 ± 6 days, P = .004; 35 ± 9 versus 26 ± 6 days, P = .002; and 29 ± 7 versus 37 ± 6 days, P = .051). In the first bone marrow study after the HCT (median time, 42 days; range 14 to 157 days, respectively), patients with <100 WT1 copies also had better outcomes in terms of OS, PFS, and CIR (40 ± 7 versus 31 ± 9 days, P = .025; 36 ± 7 versus 30 ± 8 days, P = .004; and 29 ± 6 days versus 54 ± 9, P < .001, respectively). At this time point, bone marrrow samples with >100 copies also included patients who were negative for MRD as assessed by MPFC (19 of 32). During the HCT follow-up, patients with sustained WT1 levels <100 copies showed a marked benefit in terms of OS, PFS, and CIR even compared with those with only a single measurement >100 copies (mean, 68 ± 11 versus 26 ± 7 days, P < .001; 63 ± 11 versus 20 ± 8 days, P < .001; and 20 ± 8 vs. 71 ± 8 days, P < .001, respectively). Standardized bone marrow WT1 levels using a 100-copy threshold in samples obtained before HCT, at leukocyte recovery, and during follow-up provided relevant prognostic information in patients with myeloid malignacies submitted to HCT.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has become a promising option after allo-SCT, but infections may be more common than in traditional protocols. We herein report 117 consecutive adults who received PTCy-based alloSCT in our hospital: HaploSCT (34%), MRD (19%), and VUD (47%), respectively. The 18-month incidence of severe bacterial, viral, and IFI was 56%, 69%, and 8.7%, without differences between donor type, except for CMV infection and viral hemorrhagic cystitis, which had a higher incidence in the haploSCT cohort (58% vs. 43% and 30% vs. 8% on day +90, p < 0.05). Late infections by conventional respiratory viruses were common in all groups [33/87 (38%)]. The 2-year survival was 72% and did not differ by donor type. IRM at day 30, day 100, and 18 months was 1.7%, 4.4%, and 12%, without differences by donor type (p = 0.7). The primary cause of IRM was bacterial infection (42%). Grade 2-4 acute GvHD was the only independent predictor of IRM. Donor type had no impact on IRM or on survival. In our study, severe infections were common in all donor types using PTCy, with higher rates of early post-engraftment CMV-I and viral HC in haploSCT recipients, although lethal infections were uncommon and similar in all donor types.