A systematic approach to mental health triaging produced a workable scale, reduced waiting times, transit times, and provided effective and consistent integration of mental health patients into a general emergency department.

BackgroundIt is challenging to engage repeat users of unscheduled healthcare with severe health anxiety in psychological help and high service costs are incurred. We investigated whether clinical and economic outcomes were improved by offering remote cognitive behaviour therapy (RCBT) using videoconferencing or telephone compared to treatment as usual (TAU).MethodsA single-blind, parallel group, multicentre randomised controlled trial was undertaken in primary and general hospital care. Participants were aged ≥18 years with ≥2 unscheduled healthcare contacts within 12 months and scored >18 on the Health Anxiety Inventory. Randomisation to RCBT or TAU was stratified by site, with allocation conveyed to a trial administrator, research assessors masked to outcome. Data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome was change in HAI score from baseline to six months on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes were generalised anxiety, depression, physical symptoms, function and overall health. Health economics analysis was conducted from a health service and societal perspective.ResultsOf the 524 patients who were referred and assessed for trial eligibility, 470 were eligible and 156 (33%) were recruited; 78 were randomised to TAU and 78 to RCBT. Compared to TAU, RCBT significantly reduced health anxiety at six months, maintained to 9 and 12 months (mean change difference HAI –2.81; 95% CI –5.11 to –0.50; P = 0.017). Generalised anxiety, depression and overall health was significantly improved at 12 months, but there was no significant change in physical symptoms or function. RCBT was strictly dominant with a net monetary benefit of £3,164 per participant at a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000. No treatment-related adverse events were reported in either group.ConclusionsRCBT may reduce health anxiety, general anxiety and depression and improve overall health, with considerable reductions in health and informal care costs in repeat users of unscheduled care with severe health anxiety who have previously been difficult to engage in psychological treatment. RCBT may be an easy-to-implement intervention to improve clinical outcome and save costs in one group of repeat users of unscheduled care.Trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 19 Nov 2014 with reference number NCT02298036Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1253-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

The localization and distribution of neuropeptides in the central nervous system of the pig roundworm, Ascaris suum, have been determined by an indirect immunofluorescence technique in conjunction with confocal microscopy. Antisera to 25 vertebrate peptides and two invertebrate peptides were used to screen the worm for immunoreactivity (IR). Immunostaining was obtained with antisera to pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY), neuropeptide Y (NPY), gastrin, cholecystokinin (CCK), substance P (SP), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), salmon gonadotropin-releasing hormone (SGnRH), mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone (MGnRH), chromogranin A (CGA) and FMRFamide. The most extensive patterns of IR occurred with antisera to PYY, FMRFamide and gastrin. IR was evident in nerve cells and fibres in the ganglia associated with the anterior nerve ring and in the main nerve cords and their commissures; IR to FMRFamide also occurred in the posterior nerve ring. Immunostaining for the other peptides was confined to the nerve cords, with the number of immunoreactive nerve fibres varying from peptide to peptide.

Objectives: To identify the features of the emergency department visit most important to patients, and to compare emergency staff ranking of the same features. Setting: The Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania is a 520‐bed public hospital with an annual department of emergency medicine census of 33 000. Methods: Five hundred and fifty‐five emergency patients, and 60 emergency department medical and nursing staff were surveyed, asking each to rank 10 features of the emergency department visit in order of importance to patients. Analysis was by Chi‐squared test and Mann –Whitney U‐test to compare survey responses between the patient and staff populations. Results: Response rates were 36% for patients and 78% for staff. Patients ranked waiting time as most important, followed by symptom relief, a caring and concerned attitude from staff and diagnosis of the presenting complaint. Staff identified the same four factors as important but ranked waiting time fourth. Waiting times during the survey week were within Australian College for Emergency Medicine performance benchmarks of 84% of the emergency department census. Conclusions: This survey identified a mismatch between patient concerns and emergency staff perceptions, particularly with regard to waiting times. The results justify the use of waiting times as a performance indicator for emergency medicine.