Using limited assets, an interdictor attempts to destroy parts of a capacitated network through which an adversary will subsequently maximize flow. We formulate and solve a stochastic version of the interdictor's problem: Minimize the expected maximum flow through the network when interdiction successes are binary random variables. Extensions are made to handle uncertain arc capacities and other realistic variations. These two-stage stochastic integer programs have applications to interdicting illegal drugs and to reducing the effectiveness of a military force moving materiel, troops, information, etc., through a network in wartime. Two equivalent model formulations allow Jensen's inequality to be used to compute both lower and upper bounds on the objective, and these bounds are improved within a sequential approximation algorithm. Successful computational results are reported on networks with over 100 nodes, 80 interdictable arcs, and 180 total arcs.
We describe two stochastic network interdiction models for thwarting nuclear smuggling. In the first model, the smuggler travels through a transportation network on a path that maximizes the probability of evading detection, and the interdictor installs radiation sensors to minimize that evasion probability. The problem is stochastic because the smuggler's origin-destination pair is known only through a probability distribution at the time when the sensors are installed. In this model, the smuggler knows the locations of all sensors and the interdictor and the smuggler "agree" on key network parameters, namely the probabilities the smuggler will be detected while traversing the arcs of the transportation network. Our second model differs in that the interdictor and smuggler can have differing perceptions of these network parameters. This model captures the case in which the smuggler is aware of only a subset of the sensor locations. For both models, we develop the important special case in which the sensors can only be installed at border crossings of a single country so that the resulting model is defined on a bipartite network. In this special case, a class of valid inequalities reduces the computation time for the identical-perceptions model.
Determining whether a solution is of high quality (optimal or near optimal) is a fundamental question in optimization theory and algorithms. In this paper, we develop Monte Carlo samplingbased procedures for assessing solution quality in stochastic programs. Quality is defined via the optimality gap and our procedures' output is a confidence interval on this gap. We review a multiple-replications procedure that requires solution of, say, 30 optimization problems and then, we present a result that justifies a computationally simplified single-replication procedure that only requires solving one optimization problem. Even though the single replication procedure is computationally significantly less demanding, the resulting confidence interval might have low coverage probability for small sample sizes for some problems. We provide variants of this procedure that require two replications instead of one and that perform better empirically. We present computational results for a newsvendor problem and for two-stage stochastic linear programs from the literature. We also discuss when the procedures perform well and when they fail and provide preliminary guidelines for selecting a candidate solution.
W e consider stochastic vehicle routing problems on a network with random travel and service times. A fleet of one or more vehicles is available to be routed through the network to service each node. Two versions of the model are developed based on alternative objective functions. We provide bounds on optimal objective function values and conditions under which reductions to simpler models can be made. Our solution method embeds a branch-and-cut scheme within a Monte Carlo sampling-based procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.