Senile plaques composed of amyloid-β protein (Aβ) are an unshakable feature of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. Although there is significant debate on the role of the plaques in AD progression, there is little disagreement on their role in stimulating a robust inflammatory response within the context of the disease. Significant inflammatory markers such as activated microglia and cytokines are observed almost exclusively surrounding the plaques. However, recent evidence suggests that the plaque exterior may contain a measurable level of soluble Aβ aggregates. The observations that microglia activation in vivo is selectively stimulated by distinct Aβ deposits led us to examine what specific form of Aβ is the most effective proinflammatory mediator in vitro. We report here that soluble prefibrillar species of Aβ(1-42) were better than fibrils at inducing microglial tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) production in either BV-2 and primary murine microglia. Reconstitution of Aβ(1-42) in NaOH followed by dilution into F-12 media and isolation with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) revealed classic curvilinear β-sheet protofibrils 100 nm in length. The protofibrils, but not monomers, markedly activated BV-2 microglia. Comparisons were also made between freshly isolated protofibrils and Aβ(1-42) fibrils prepared from SEC-purified monomer. Surprisingly, while isolated fibrils had a much higher level of thioflavin T fluorescence per mole, they were not effective at stimulating either primary or BV-2 murine microglia compared to protofibrils. Furthermore, SEC-isolated Aβ(1-40) protofibrils exhibited significantly less activity than concentration-matched Aβ(1-42). This report is the first to demonstrate microglial activation by SEC-purified protofibrils, and the overall findings indicate that small, soluble Aβ(1-42) protofibrils induce much greater microglial activation than mature insoluble fibrils.

Some of the pathological hallmarks of the Alzheimer's disease brain are senile plaques composed of insoluble amyloid-β protein (Aβ) fibrils. However, much of the recent emphasis in research has been on soluble Aβ aggregates in response to a growing body of evidence that shows that these species may be more neurotoxic than fibrils. Within this subset of soluble aggregated Aβ are protofibrils and oligomers. Although each species has been widely investigated separately, few studies have directly compared and contrasted their physical properties. In this work, we examined well-recognized preparations of Aβ(1-42) oligomers and protofibrils with multiangle (MALS) and dynamic (DLS) light scattering in line with, or following, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Multiple SEC-MALS analyses of protofibrils revealed molecular weight (Mw) gradients ranging from 200 to 2600 kDa. Oligomeric Aβ species are generally considered to be a smaller and more nascent than protofibrils. However, oligomer Mw values ranged from 225 to 3000 kDa, larger than that for protofibrils. Root-mean-square radius (Rg) values correlated with the Mw trends with protofibril Rg values ranging from 16 to 35 nm, while oligomers produced one population at 40-43 nm with a more disperse population from 22 to 39 nm. Hydrodynamic radius (RH) measurements by DLS and thioflavin T fluorescence measurements indicated that protofibrils and oligomers had commonalities, yet electron microscopy revealed morphological differences between the two. SEC-purified Aβ(1-42) monomer at lower concentrations was slower to nucleate but formed protofibrils (1500 kDa) or soluble protofilaments (3000 kDa) depending on the buffer type. The findings from these studies shed new light on the similarities and differences between distinct soluble aggregated Aβ species.

Microvesicles (MVs) and exosomes comprise a class of cell-secreted particles termed extracellular vesicles (EVs). These cargo-holding vesicles mediate cell-to-cell communication and have recently been implicated in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). The two types of EVs are distinguished by the mechanism of cell release and their size, with the smaller exosomes and the larger MVs ranging from 30 to 100 nm and 100 nm to 1 μm in diameter, respectively. MV numbers are increased in AD and appear to interact with amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), the primary protein component of the neuritic plaques in the AD brain. Because microglial cells play such an important role in AD-linked neuroinflammation, we sought to characterize MVs shed from microglial cells, better understand MV interactions with Aβ, and determine whether internalized Aβ may be incorporated into secreted MVs. Multiple strategies were used to characterize MVs shed from BV-2 microglia after ATP stimulation. Confocal images of isolated MVs bound to fluorescently labeled annexin-V via externalized phosphatidylserine revealed a polydisperse population of small spherical structures. Dynamic light scattering measurements yielded MV diameters ranging from 150 to 600 nm. Electron microscopy of resin-embedded MVs cut into thin slices showed well-defined uranyl acetate-stained ring-like structures in a similar diameter range. The use of a fluorescently labeled membrane insertion probe, NBD C-HPC, effectively tracked MVs in binding experiments, and an Aβ ELISA confirmed a strong interaction between MVs and Aβ protofibrils but not Aβ monomers. Despite the lesser monomer interaction, MVs had an inhibitory effect on monomer aggregation. Primary microglia rapidly internalized Aβ protofibrils, and subsequent stimulation of the microglia with ATP resulted in the release of MVs containing the internalized Aβ protofibrils. The role of MVs in neurodegeneration and inflammation is an emerging area, and further knowledge of MV interaction with Aβ may shed light on extracellular spread and influence on neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation.

The quantity of protein and carbohydrate comprising the matrix of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) renal stones was found to decrease with distance from the surface of the stone. The average organic concentration of stones 3 to 30 mm in diameter ranged from 5.7% at the surface to 2.7% at the core. This concentration gradient suggests matrix involvement in a "growth front" on stone surfaces with migration of organic material from the "older" interior. The matrix distribution was not readily correlated with density variations or with the presence of hydroxyapatite or calcium oxalate dihydrate. Surface matrix concentrations were greater than amounts predicted by physical adsorption. Electron microscopy confirmed the presence of the organic-rich surface layer and also suggested that increase in stone size occurs predominantly by crystal growth with microcrystal aggregates as growth centers.

No abstract