A mbulatory surgical centers (ASCs) offer surgeons an effective setting to perform procedures that do not require prolonged postoperative monitoring or an inpatient hospital stay. Advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, short-acting general anesthetics, long-acting local anesthetics, and blood loss management have improved the safety and recovery for many orthopedic procedures. These changes to perioperative care have reduced the need for postoperative hospitalization in many surgical specialties. As a result, the number of procedures performed in the ambulatory setting has grown significantly. The health care market has been pushing for an increased quality of care at a lower cost. Ambulatory surgical centers provide an average 84% cost reduction in proce-

Distal biceps repair is associated with a 7.5% major complication rate and 4.5% reoperation rate. The use of a 2-incision technique for repair increases the risk of radioulnar synostosis.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Aims Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is a frequent cause of failure in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management options include an isolated tibial revision or full component revision. A full component revision is frequently selected by surgeons unfamiliar with the existing implant or who simply wish to “start again”. This option adds morbidity compared with an isolated tibial revision. While isolated tibial revision has a lower morbidity, it is technically more challenging due to difficulties with exposure and maintaining prosthetic stability. This study was designed to compare these two reconstructive options. Methods Patients undergoing revision TKA for isolated aseptic tibial loosening between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Those with revision implants or revised for infection, instability, osteolysis, or femoral component loosening were excluded. A total of 164 patients were included; 88 had an isolated tibial revision and 76 had revision of both components despite only having a loose tibial component. The demographics and clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded. Results The patient demographics were statistically similar in the two cohorts. The median follow-up was 3.5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 12.5). Supplementary femoral metaphyseal fixation was required in five patients in the full revision cohort. There was a higher incidence of radiological tibial loosening in the full component revision cohort at the final follow-up (8 (10.5%) vs 5 (5.7%); p = 0.269). Three patients in the full component revision cohort developed instability while only one in the isolated tibial cohort did. Three patients in the full revision cohort developed a flexion contracture greater than 5° while none in the isolated tibial cohort did. Conclusion Isolated tibial revision for aseptic tibial loosening has statistically similar clinical and radiological outcomes at a median follow-up of 3.5 years, when compared with full component revision. Substantial bone loss can occur when removing a well-fixed femoral component necessitating a cone or sleeve. Femoral component revision for isolated tibial loosening can frequently be avoided provided adequate ligamentous stability can be obtained. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):123–128.

Objectives: Despite clinical and economic advantages, routine utilization of telemedicine remains uncommon. The purpose of this study was to examine potential disparities in access and utilization of telehealth services during the rapid transition to virtual clinic during the coronavirus pandemic. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual—Doxy.me) over a 7-week period at a Level I Trauma Center orthopaedic clinic. Intervention: Virtual visits utilizing the Doxy.me platform. Main Outcome Measures: Accessing at least 1 virtual visit (“Virtual”) or having telephone or in-person visits only (“No virtual”). Methods: All outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual) during a 7-week period were tracked. At the end of the 7-week period, the electronic medical record was queried for each of the 641 patients who had a visit during this period for the following variables: gender, ethnicity, race, age, payer source, home zip code. Data were analyzed for both the total number of visits (n = 785) and the total number of unique patients (n = 641). Patients were identified as accessing at least 1 virtual visit (“Virtual”) or having telephone or in-person visits only (“No virtual”). Results: Weekly totals demonstrated a rapid increase from 0 to greater than 50% virtual visits by the third week of quarantine with sustained high rates of virtual visits throughout the study period. Hispanic and Black/African American patients were able to access virtual care at similar rates to White/Caucasian patients. Patients of ages 65 to 74 and 75+ accessed virtual care at lower rates than patients ≤64 ( P = .003). No difference was found in rates of virtual care between payer sources. A statistically significant difference was found between patients from different zip codes ( P = .028). Conclusion: A rapid transition to virtual clinic can be performed at a level 1 trauma center, and high rates of virtual visits can be maintained. However, disparities in access exist and need to be addressed.

Background: Distal biceps repair is a commonly reported procedure in male patients, with reliable outcomes and minimal long-term complications. Information on female patients, however, is limited, and variation in presentation and clinical outcomes is unknown. Questions/Purpose: We sought to report on the presentation, treatment algorithm, and outcomes of a case series of female patients with distal biceps pathology. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed from a large, single specialty orthopedic group from 2005 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were surgical treatment of the distal biceps in female patients, with minimum 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome variable was the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Results: Of 26 patients who met inclusion criteria, 18 (70%) were available for follow-up with patient-reported outcomes. Median age at time of injury was 56.1 years; 46.2% of patients presented with a complete tear of the distal biceps, and the remaining 53.8% presented with a partial tear that failed nonoperative treatment. Six patients had lateral antebrachial cutaneous neuritis in early follow-up, which ultimately resolved. Median MEPS score was 100 (interquartile range: 20). Conclusion: This study represents the largest case series to date describing the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of female patients with distal biceps repair. Women tend to be older than men, have more insidious onset of pain, present with partial tearing, and may benefit from nonoperative treatment. Ultimately, based on this case series we believe distal biceps repair in female patients is a successful operation with minimal complications and high patient satisfaction.