The whale shark is an ideal flagship species for 'citizen science' projects because of its charismatic nature, regular presence at numerous coastal aggregation sites and a growing number of ecotourism ventures focusing on the species. An online database of Whale Shark encounters, identifying individuals based on their unique skin patterning from 1992 to 2014 captured almost 30,000 whale shark encounter reports, comprising more than 6000 individuals identified from 54 countries. In this time the number of known whale shark aggregation sites increased from 13 to 20. Examination of encounters revealed a skewed sexratio bias towards males (overall >66%), high site fidelity amongst individuals with limited movements of sharks between neighbouring countries/regions but no records confirming 2 large, ocean basin-scale migrations. Citizen science has been vital in amassing large spatial and temporal datasets to elucidate key aspects of whale shark life-history and demographics and will continue to provide substantial long-term value.

The oral health impact among cleft patients included in our study was poor compared with population-level estimates. The HRQoL showed mixed results, with the vitality and mental health components being poorer in the cleft group compared with population-level estimates. These results indicate that treatment for orofacial clefting does not entirely remove the factors contributing to poor HRQoL and oral health.

Donsol in the Philippines is the longest running community-based whale shark (Rhincodon typus) ecotourism site in Southeast Asia, with peak visitation in 2012 of over 27,000 tourists. In order to understand this aggregation and the importance of the area to whale sharks, dedicated photographic identification (photo-ID) research began in 2007. In-water photo-ID surveys were conducted from tourism boats, weather and operator permitting, from December to June between 2007 and 2016. Visual matches of the unique spot patterns of each individual shark were validated by the pattern-recognition software Interactive Individual Identification System (I 3 S), and on the online database Wildbook for Whale Sharks (www.whaleshark.org). A total of 1,985 photo-ID trips over 895 survey days resulted in 6,786 encounters with R. typus. Combined with encounters from both dedicated research and citizen science dating back to 1998, 479 individual whale sharks were identified, making up 44% of the known whale shark population in the Philippines (n = 1,095). Of these, photographs of the pelvic region confirmed the sex for 158 males and 22 females. Visual size estimates ranged from 2 to 10 m (mean ± SD = 6.5 ± 1.6 m). Maturity in males (LT 50 ) was estimated at 6.8 ± 0.2 m total length, with 53% of males considered mature. Annually, the total number of individuals sighted varied between 15 and 185 (mean ± SD = 104 ± 55.53), with a recruitment of 3-90 new individuals yearly (mean ± SD = 46.8 ± 36.29). Modeled residency using maximum likelihood methods suggested whale sharks spent 49.8 ± S.E. 14.5 [95% CI (32.3-78.6)] days in Donsol each season, with 47.1-60.8 whale sharks at any one time during the season. Twenty individuals were recorded through photo-ID at other sites across the Philippines. The extended residency of whale sharks at Donsol, paired with the presence of sexually mature animals and the economic value of the tourism industry, highlights the importance of Donsol for this endangered species.

The objectives of this study were to compare the ratings of professionals and laypeople with and without a cleft regarding the facial aesthetics of adult patients previously treated for orofacial clefting. The necessity for further treatment, as perceived by the respective groups, is also compared. The design of the study was a cross-sectional study. Professionals (two plastic surgeons, one dentist, one orthodontist, and one psychologist) and laypeople (one male and one female adult without a cleft and one male and one female adult with a cleft) were recruited to rate photographs of 80 non-syndromic cleft patients treated by the Australian Craniofacial Unit from 1975 to 2009. Facial aesthetics were measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100 mm). High values indicated good aesthetics. Necessity for further treatment was also measured by a VAS (0-100 mm). High values indicated high perceived need for further treatment. The professionals rated facial aesthetics significantly lower and had a lower perception of need for further treatment than the raters with and without a cleft. The laypeople with a cleft rated facial aesthetics significantly higher and had a lower perceived need for further treatment than laypeople without a cleft. The non-surgical professionals rated facial aesthetics significantly lower and had a lower perceived need for further treatment than the surgical professionals. Differences exist in the facial aesthetics ratings and perceived need for further surgery between professionals and laypeople with and without a cleft. This should be considered when managing cleft treatment expectations.

No abstract

No abstract

MGS and basal encephalocele should always be suspected in cases of midline deficiencies, particularly when ophthalmic signs of strabismus or poor vision are present. CT and MRI should be performed to delineate the extent of the lesion and a complete hormone screening should be carried out to exclude pituitary deficiency. The pathogenesis of MGS and basal encephalocele are unknown; however, it is thought to occur during the 5th week of embryonic development.

Introduction: The cranial sutures allow for growth of the developing brain in both the pre-and post-natal period but also play a crucial role in vaginal delivery. Birth problems are commonly reported by the mothers of children with craniosynostosis and, in particular, sagittal synostosis. Methods: Patients presenting with all forms of craniosynostosis were identified through a search of computer records, and the antenatal imaging was obtained and examined. The fetal cranial measurements including biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter and head circumference were recorded, and the cephalic index (CI) was calculated for each affected fetus. A birth history was also recorded. Results: Scans in both the second and third trimesters were available for 28 fetuses who had sagittal synostosis. Eight fetuses (29%) had a significant reduction in CI (>3) between the morphology and growth scans. There was an increase in the number of emergency caesarean deliveries in women whose fetuses had sagittal synostosis when compared with the general population (22% vs. 17%). Conclusion: The calculation of CI can be performed routinely at antenatal scanning. A value outside the normal range or a change in CI during the pregnancy should prompt detailed scanning of the fetal skull and cranial sutures. This will assist obstetricians with delivery planning.