<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; color: black; font-size: 10pt;">The examination of Student Evaluation Instruments (SEI) has generated a considerable literature. Interestingly, this extensive literature provides no clear guidance on how to interpret SEI results in order to make comparative evaluations of instructors’ performances. The research presented in this paper draws upon six semesters worth of SEI responses for all courses in our school of business – a database of nearly 30,000 responses. The paper examines how core measures of teaching effectiveness – student evaluation of instructor’s teaching ability and willingness to recommend the instructor – are affected by several factors. These factors include:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>the department from which the course was offered; whether the course was required by the core, the department or was an elective; the status of the student and the anticipated grade. Statistical analyses are conducted to examine and determine the impact of these factors and their interactions. The goal is to develop a system that can more accurately gauge instructors’ performances as measured by the student evaluation instrument.</span></p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.