Background Evidence suggests a role for excessive inflammation in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an oral anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis, and coronary disease. We aimed to investigate the effect of colchicine on the composite of COVID-19-related death or hospital admission.Methods The present study is a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, adaptive, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The study was done in Brazil, Canada, Greece, South Africa, Spain, and the USA, and was led by the Montreal Heart Institute. Patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by PCR testing or clinical criteria who were not being treated in hospital were eligible if they were at least 40 years old and had at least one high-risk characteristic. The randomisation list was computer-generated by an unmasked biostatistician, and masked randomisation was centralised and done electronically through an automated interactive web-response system. The allocation sequence was unstratified and used a 1:1 ratio with a blocking schema and block sizes of six. Patients were randomly assigned to receive orally administered colchicine (0•5 mg twice per day for 3 days and then once per day for 27 days thereafter) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospital admission for COVID-19. Vital status at the end of the study was available for 97•9% of patients. The analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The COLCORONA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04322682) and is now closed to new participants. FindingsTrial enrolment began in March 23, 2020, and was completed in Dec 22, 2020. A total of 4488 patients (53•9% women; median age 54•0 years, IQR 47•0-61•0) were enrolled and 2235 patients were randomly assigned to colchicine and 2253 to placebo. The primary endpoint occurred in 104 (4•7%) of 2235 patients in the colchicine group and 131 (5•8%) of 2253 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 0•79, 95•1% CI 0•61-1•03; p=0•081). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 96 (4•6%) of 2075 patients in the colchicine group and 126 (6•0%) of 2084 patients in the placebo group (OR 0•75, 0•57-0•99; p=0•042). Serious adverse events were reported in 108 (4•9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 139 (6•3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0•051); pneumonia occurred in 63 (2•9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 92 (4•1%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0•021). Diarrhoea was reported in 300 (13•7%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 161 (7•3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p<0•0001).Interpretation In community-treated patients including those without a mandatory diagnostic test, the effect of colchicine on COVID-19-related clinical events was not statistically significant. Among patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, colchicine led to a lower rate of the composite of death or hospital admission than placebo. Given the absence of orally administered therapies to pr...

BackgroundEvidence suggests the role of an inflammatory storm in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an orally administered, anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis and coronary disease.MethodsWe performed a randomized, double-blind trial involving non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing or clinical criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to receive colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily for 3 days and once daily thereafter) or placebo for 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospitalization for COVID-19.ResultsA total of 4488 patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.7% of the patients in the colchicine group and 5.8% of those in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.79; 95.1% confidence interval (CI), 0.61 to 1.03; P=0.08). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 4.6% and 6.0% of patients in the colchicine and placebo groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99; P=0.04). In these patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the odds ratios were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99) for hospitalization due to COVID-19, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.23 to 1.07) for mechanical ventilation, and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.66) for death. Serious adverse events were reported in 4.9% and 6.3% in the colchicine and placebo groups (P=0.05); pneumonia occurred in 2.9% and 4.1% of patients (P=0.02). Diarrhea was reported in 13.7% and 7.3% in the colchicine and placebo groups (P<0.0001).ConclusionAmong non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19, colchicine reduces the composite rate of death or hospitalization. (COLCORONA ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04322682)

No abstract

Although colchicine, a natural product, is one of the oldest drugs still currently available, its possible functions seem to be surprisingly not well-known. Beyond its present medicinal use (gout, familial Mediterranean fever, Behcet's disease, chondrocalcinosis and other crystal arthritis), numerous other conditions have been recently proposed for the use of this drug, including pericardial diseases. However, colchicine appears as a double-edged sword, with underestimated toxicity and frequent side effects. In this review, we present the main pharmacologic features of this drug, with an emphasis on toxicity and highlight its possible applications in the cardiovascular field.

Background and purpose: Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is the most common valvular heart disease, and standard curative therapy remains open heart surgical valve replacement. The aim of our experimental study was to determine if apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) mimetic peptide infusions could induce regression of AVS. Experimental approach: Fifteen New Zealand White male rabbits received a cholesterol-enriched diet and vitamin D 2 until significant AVS was detected by echocardiography. The enriched diet was then stopped to mimic cholesterol-lowering therapy and animals were allocated randomly to receive saline (control group, n ¼ 8) or an ApoA-I mimetic peptide (treated group, n ¼ 7), three times per week for 2 weeks. Serial echocardiograms and post mortem valve histology were performed. Key results: Aortic valve area increased significantly by 25% in the treated group after 14 days of treatment (P ¼ 0.012). Likewise, aortic valve thickness decreased by 21% in the treated group, whereas it was unchanged in controls (P ¼ 0.0006). Histological analysis revealed that the extent of lesions at the base of valve leaflets and sinuses of Valsalva was smaller in the treated group compared with controls (P ¼ 0.032). The treatment also reduced calcification, as revealed by the loss of the positive relationship observed in the control group (r ¼ 0.87, P ¼ 0.004) between calcification area and aortic valve thickness. Conclusions and implications: Infusions of ApoA-I mimetic peptide lead to regression of experimental AVS. These positive results justify the further testing of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-based therapies in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Regression of aortic stenosis, if achieved safely, could transform the clinical treatment of this disease.

BackgroundThe Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds (CAHHM) is a pan-Canadian, prospective, multi-ethnic cohort study being conducted in Canada. The overarching objective of the CAHHM is to understand the association of socio-environmental and contextual factors (such as societal structure, activity, nutrition, social and tobacco environments, and access to health services) with cardiovascular risk factors, subclinical vascular disease, and cardiovascular and other chronic disease outcomes.Methods/DesignParticipants between 35 and 69 years of age are being recruited from existing cohorts and a new First Nations Cohort to undergo a detailed assessment of health behaviours (including diet and physical activity), cognitive function, assessment of their local home and workplace environments, and their health services access and utilization. Physical measures including weight, height, waist/hip circumference, body fat percentage, and blood pressure are collected. In addition, eligible participants undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, heart, carotid artery and abdomen to detect early subclinical vascular disease and ectopic fat deposition.DiscussionCAHHM is a prospective cohort study designed to investigate the impact of community level factors, individual health behaviours, and access to health services, on cognitive function, subclinical vascular disease, fat distribution, and the development of chronic diseases among adults living in Canada.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3310-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives: To determine if heart rate (HR) reduction with ivabradine (IVA), a selective inhibitor of the pacemaker I_f current, prevents cardiac dysfunction associated with dyslipidemia. Methods: New Zealand White rabbits received either a standard diet, a 0.5% cholesterol-enriched diet only (CD), or a 0.5% CD with IVA (17 mg/kg/day) for 12 weeks. HR, left ventricular (LV) systolic function, diastolic function and LV regional myocardial performance index (MPI) were studied using echocardiography. Histological analysis included cardiac interstitial fibrosis and collagen type I fibers. Plasma levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone were quantified by immunoassays. Results: IVA reduced HR by approximately 11%. IVA improved MPI and attenuated LV diastolic dysfunction (DD) (92% mild and 8% moderate DD with IVA vs. 54% mild and 46% moderate DD in CD group). IVA also reduced atrial fibrosis (p = 0.027), ventricular fibrosis (p = 0.0002) and ventricular collagen type I (p = 0.0042). IVA decreased plasma angiotensin II levels (p = 0.042), and both angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were correlated with HR (p = 0.038 and 0.008). Conclusion: Selective HR reduction with IVA reduces DD and cardiac fibrosis in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. These beneficial effects of IVA support testing pure HR reduction in patients with diastolic heart failure.

BackgroundMacrophage cholesterol efflux to high‐density lipoproteins (HDLs) is the first step of reverse cholesterol transport. The cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) of HDL particles is a protective risk factor for coronary artery disease independent of HDL cholesterol levels. Using a genome‐wide association study approach, we aimed to identify pathways that regulate CEC in humans.Methods and ResultsWe measured CEC in 5293 French Canadians. We tested the genetic association between 4 CEC measures and genotypes at >9 million common autosomal DNA sequence variants. These analyses yielded 10 genome‐wide significant signals (P<6.25×10−9) representing 7 loci. Five of these loci harbor genes with important roles in lipid biology (CETP,LIPC,LPL,APOA1/C3/A4/A5, and APOE /C1/C2/C4). Except for the APOE/C1/C2/C4 variant (rs141622900, P nonadjusted=1.0×10−11; P adjusted=8.8×10−9), the association signals disappear when correcting for HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels. The additional 2 significant signals were near the PPP1CB/PLB1 and RBFOX3/ENPP7 genes. In secondary analyses, we considered candidate functional variants for 58 genes implicated in HDL biology, as well as 239 variants associated with blood lipid levels and/or coronary artery disease risk by genome‐wide association study. These analyses identified 27 significant CEC associations, implicating 5 additional loci (GCKR,LIPG,PLTP,PPARA, and TRIB1).ConclusionsOur genome‐wide association study identified common genetic variation at the APOE/C1/C2/C4 locus as a major determinant of CEC that acts largely independently of HDL cholesterol. We predict that HDL‐based therapies aiming at increasing CEC will be modulated by changes in the expression of apolipoproteins in this gene cluster.