No abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the school-age outcome of a cohort of children treated with intensive care support for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).Study Design: From 187 term newborns treated for PPHN as neonates, 109 were seen at school age (73% of 150 survivors and 58.2% of the original cohort). Of these 109 term newborns, 77 were treated with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO); of which 12 received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The remaining 32 received conventional management with no exposure to iNO. Patients were seen at school age (mean 7.1 years). A medical history and physical exam were completed, growth was measured, and chest X-ray and echocardiogram were performed. Psychometric assessments included the Wechsler Scales (Preschool or Child), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Children's Category Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist.Results: Medical, neurodevelopmental and social/emotional/behavioral outcome did not differ between children treated with iNO, with or without ECMO, and those managed with no exposure to iNO. Overall, 24% had respiratory problems, 60% had abnormal chest X-rays and 6.4% had some sensorineural hearing loss. The cohort performed at the average level for full scale IQ, adaptive function, academic achievement, higher-order cognition and executive functioning, and social/behavioral/emotional functioning. Overall, 9.2% of the cohort had a full scale IQ less than 70 and 7.4% had an IQ from 70 to 84. Conclusion:The outcome for this cohort of children treated as newborns for PPHN, which included a large group of infants exposed to iNO, was comparable to previous reports of children treated with ECMO or conventionally. Journal of Perinatology (2010) 30, 127-134; doi:10.1038/jp.2009 published online 1 October 2009 Keywords: persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn; inhaled nitric oxide; school-age outcome Introduction Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been found to be an effective and safe treatment for persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) in the term and near-term newborns.1-5 The use of iNO has been found to improve oxygenation and decrease the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in term newborns with acute respiratory failure and PPHN.

Study Design: Prospective multicenter cohort study. Objective: To investigate (1) the discriminative ability and cutoff estimates for success 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) raw score compared with a change and a percentage change score and (2) to what extent these clinical outcomes depend on the baseline disability. Methods: A total of 6840 patients operated for lumbar disc herniation from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) were included. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, a global perceived effect (GPE) scale (1-7) was used an external anchor. Success was defined as categories 1-2, “completely recovered” and “much better.” Cutoffs for success for subgroups with different preoperative disability were also estimated. Results: When defining success after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, 95% CI) for the ODI raw score (0.83, 0.87, 0.930, 0.924-0.937) was comparable to the ODI percentage change score (0.85, 0.85, 0.925, 0.918-0.931), and higher than the ODI change score (0.79, 0.73, 0.838, 0.830-0.852). The cutoff for success was highly dependent on the amount of baseline disability (low-high), with cutoffs ranging from 13 to 28 for the ODI raw score and 39% to 66% for ODI percentage change. The ODI change score (points) was not as accurate. Conclusion: The 12-month ODI raw score, like the ODI percentage change score, can define a successful outcome with excellent accuracy. Adjustment for the baseline ODI score should be performed when comparing outcomes across groups, and one should consider using cutoffs according to preoperative disability (low, medium, high ODI scores).