Background: Obesity is one of the most important risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) in knee(s). However, the relationship between obesity and OA in hand(s) and hip(s) remains controversial and needs further investigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity on incident osteoarthritis (OA) in hip, knee, and hand in a general population followed in 10 years.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Consensus-based recommendations are provided on outcome measurement instruments for physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

Purpose Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of systematic reviews. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials. In 1998, Deyo et al. recommended a standardized set of outcomes for LBP clinical research. The aim of this study was to update these recommendations by determining which outcome domains should be included in a COS for clinical trials in NSLBP.Methods An International Steering Committee established the methodology to develop this COS. The OMERACT Filter 2.0 framework was used to draw a list of potential core domains that were presented in a Delphi study. Researchers, care providers and patients were invited to participate in three Delphi rounds and were asked to judge which domains were core. A priori criteria for consensus were established before each round and were analysed together with arguments provided by panellists on importance, overlap, aggregation and/or addition of potential core domains. The Steering Committee discussed the final results and made final decisions.

The results suggest that all the outcome measures were appropriate for measuring changes in functional status and pain in patients with acute low back pain, whereas among chronic patients the RMDQ, ODI, DRI, and NRS were most appropriate.

The reliability and construct validity of the Norwegian versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the modified Oswestry Disability Index are acceptable for assessing functional status of Norwegian-speaking patients with low back pain.

Few studies have investigated whether prognostic indicators, which contribute to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP), are also those which contribute to continuing persistence of chronic LBP. We compared the contribution of physical, psychological and social indicators to predicting disability after one year between consulters with LBP of less than 3 months duration and more than 3 months duration. Data from two large prospective cohort studies of consecutive patients consulting with LBP in general practices were merged, providing complete data for 258 cases with acute/subacute LBP and 668 cases with chronic LBP at 12 months follow-up. There were significant differences between the two LBP groups in baseline characteristics and clinical course of disability, assessed by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, during the year of follow-up. Adjusted associations between potential prognostic indicators and disability at 12months were carried out in the two LBP subgroups. The final multivariable regression models showed that being non-employed, having widespread pain, a high level of Chronic Pain Grade, and catastrophising were the strongest prognostic indicators for disability at 12 months in both LBP groups. Fear of pain was significantly associated with disability in chronic LBP. Importantly, beyond baseline disability, the effect size of the other prognostic indicators for poor outcome was rather low. These findings must continue to challenge researchers to identify useful early predictors of outcome in persons with disabling back pain, as screening and targeted treatment approaches are dependent upon prognostic indicators with clinical significance.

The PGQ is the first condition-specific measure developed for people with PGP. The PGQ had acceptably high reliability and validity in people with PGP both during pregnancy and postpartum, it is simple to administer, and it is feasible for use in clinical practice.

Patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) frequently demonstrate high scores for fear-avoidance beliefs and distress. We need better knowledge about fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in early stages of LBP. The objectives of this study were to compare the level of fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in patients with acute LBP to patients with chronic LBP, and to assess the relationship of fear-avoidance beliefs and distress to disability in acute and chronic LBP. Two different back pain groups including 123 patients with acute and 233 patients with chronic LBP were studied. Main outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index and work loss. The scores for fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in patients with acute LBP were significantly lower than among patients with chronic LBP. The results of the multivariate regression analyses, adjusting for sociodemographic, pain and clinical variables, demonstrated that whereas fear-avoidance beliefs for physical activity and distress were significantly associated with the Oswestry Disability Index, fear-avoidance beliefs for work and distress were significantly associated with work loss. The associations showed the same pattern in acute and chronic LBP. In addition, several of the pain and clinical variables were significantly associated with the Oswestry Disability Index and fingertip-floor distance was associated with work loss. In conclusion, fear-avoidance beliefs and distress influence pain-related disability both in early acute and long-term chronic LBP. The results replicate previous reports on the association between pain experience, fear-avoidance beliefs, distress, and disability in chronic LBP, and extend the findings to patients at an early stage of acute LBP.