Bariatric surgery in morbid obesity, either through sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), leads to sustainable weight loss, improvement of metabolic disorders and changes in intestinal microbiota. Yet, the relationship between changes in gut microbiota, weight loss and surgical procedure remains incompletely understood. We determined temporal changes in microbiota composition in 45 obese patients undergoing crash diet followed by SG ( n = 22) or RYGB ( n = 23). Intestinal microbiota composition was determined before intervention (baseline, S1), 2 weeks after crash diet (S2), and 1 week (S3), 3 months (S4) and 6 months (S5) after surgery. Relative to S1, the microbial diversity index declined at S2 and S3 ( p < 0.05), and gradually returned to baseline levels at S5. Rikenellaceae relative abundance increased and Ruminococcaceae and Streptococcaceae abundance decreased at S2 ( p < 0.05). At S3, Bifidobacteriaceae abundance decreased, whereas those of Streptococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae increased ( p < 0.05). Increased weight loss between S3-S5 was not associated with major changes in microbiota composition. No significant differences appeared between both surgical procedures. In conclusion, undergoing a crash diet and bariatric surgery were associated with an immediate but temporary decline in microbial diversity, with immediate and permanent changes in microbiota composition, independent of surgery type.

Background Digital self-management support tools (DSMSTs)—electronic devices or monitoring systems to monitor or improve health status—have become increasingly important in cancer care. Objective The aim of this review is to analyze published randomized clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of DSMSTs on physical and psychosocial symptoms or other supportive care needs in adult patients with cancer. Methods Five databases were searched from January 2013 to January 2020. English or Dutch language randomized controlled trials comparing DSMSTs with no intervention, usual care, alternative interventions, or a combination and including patients aged ≥18 years with pathologically proven cancer in the active treatment or survivorship phases were included. The results were summarized qualitatively. Results A total of 19 publications describing 3 types of DSMSTs were included. Although the content, duration, and frequency of interventions varied considerably across studies, the commonly used elements included an assessment component, tailored symptom self-management support, an information section, a communication section, and a diary. Significant positive effects were observed on quality of life in 6 (out of 10) studies, on anxiety in 1 (out of 5) study and depression in 2 (out of 8) studies, on symptom distress in 5 (out of 7) studies, on physical activity in 4 (out of 6) studies, on dietary behavior in 1 (out of 4) study, and on fatigue in 2 (out of 5) studies. Moreover, significant negative effects were observed on anxiety in 1 (out of 5) study and depression in 1 (out of 8) study. Most interventions were web-based interventions; 2 studies used mobile apps, and 1 study used a game as a DSMST. The overall quality of the studies was found to be good, with 13 out of 19 studies classified as high quality. Conclusions This review suggests that DSMSTs have a beneficial effect on the quality of life. For effects on other patient outcomes (eg, anxiety and depression, symptom distress, physical activity, dietary behavior, and fatigue), the evidence is inconsistent and limited or no effect is suggested. Future research should focus on specific tumor types, study different types of interventions separately, and assess the effects of specific interventions at different stages of disease progression.

26Background 27

Objective. We aimed to gain consensus on HCPs’ perspectives on self-management support information needs of patients with esophageal cancer during the preoperative phase. Methods. Based on the literature, observations of clinical consultations, and hospital patient information leaflets, a survey was created. HCPs were surveyed twice about their opinion on importance of information, from “not essential” to “absolutely essential,” using Delphi methods. Topics were included in the second round if predetermined criteria were met. To be included in the final list, topics had to meet criteria for consensus and stability. Results. 64 information items and 6 sources of support were identified. Survey response rates were 59% (68 out of 116, first round) and 75% thereafter. The final list included 33 topics, including logistical information, expectations for future health condition, complications, follow-up care, nutrition during treatment, and nutrition during recovery as topics with 100% agreement. Consensus on the source of support was reached for face-to-face contact, written information, information video, and a case manager. Conclusion. This study provides a list of important topics, from the perspectives of HCPs, to guide the systematic provision of education to support EC patients’ self-management during the preoperative phase. Additionally, the most preferred sources of support were face-to-face contact and a case manager.