Ten years after the consensus meeting on disorders of sex development (DSD), genital surgery continues to raise questions and criticisms concerning its indications, its technical aspects, timing and evaluation. This standpoint details each distinct situation and its possible management in 5 main groups of DSD patients with atypical genitalia: the 46,XX DSD group (congenital adrenal hyperplasia); the heterogeneous 46,XY DSD group (gonadal dysgenesis, disorders of steroidogenesis, target tissues impairments …); gonosomic mosaicisms (45,X/46,XY patients); ovo-testicular DSD; and "non-hormonal/non chromosomal" DSD. Questions are summarized for each DSD group with the support of literature and the feed-back of several world experts. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of presentation there is no consensus regarding the indications, the timing, the procedure nor the evaluation of outcome of DSD surgery. There are, however, some issues on which most experts would agree: 1) The need for identifying centres of expertise with a multidisciplinary approach; 2) A conservative management of the gonads in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome at least until puberty although some studies expressed concerns about the heightened tumour risk in this group; 3) To avoid vaginal dilatation in children after surgical reconstruction; 4) To keep asymptomatic mullerian remnants during childhood; 5) To remove confirmed streak gonads when Y material is present; 6) It is likely that 46,XY cloacal exstrophy, aphallia and severe micropenis would do best raised as male although this is based on limited outcome data. There is general acknowledgement among experts that timing, the choice of the individual and irreversibility of surgical procedures are sources of concerns. There is, however, little evidence provided regarding the impact of non-treated DSD during childhood for the individual development, the parents, society and the risk of stigmatization. The low level of evidence should lead to design collaborative prospective studies involving all parties and using consensual protocols of evaluation.
Disorders of sex development are defined as congenital conditions with discordance between the phenotype, the genotype, the karyotype, and the hormonal profile. The disorders of sex development consensus classification established in 2005 are mainly based on chromosomal and biological data. However, histological anomalies are not considered. The aims of this study were to define the specific pathological features of gonads in various groups of disorders of sex development in order to clarify the nosology of histological findings and to evaluate the tumor risk in case of a conservative approach. One hundred and seventy-five samples from 86 patients with disorders of sex development were analyzed following a strict histological reading protocol. The term 'gonadal dysgenesis' for the histological analysis was found confusing and therefore excluded. The concept of 'dysplasia' was subsequently introduced in order to describe the architectural disorganization of the gonad (various degrees of irregular seminiferous tubules, thin albuginea, fibrous interstitium). Five histological types were identified: normal gonad, hypoplastic testis, dysplastic testis, streak gonad, and ovotestis. The analysis showed an association between undifferentiated gonadal tissue, a potential precursor of gonadoblastoma, and dysplasia. Dysplasia and undifferentiated gonadal tissue were only encountered in cases of genetic or chromosomal abnormality ('dysgenesis' groups in the disorders of sex development consensus classification). 'Dysgenetic testes', related to an embryonic malformation of the gonad, have variable histological presentations, from normal to streak. Conversely, gonads associated with hormonal deficiencies always display a normal architecture. A loss of expression of AMH and α-inhibin was identified in dysplastic areas. Foci of abnormal expression of the CD117 and OCT4 immature germ cells markers in dysplasia and undifferentiated gonadal tissue were associated with an increased risk of neoplasia. This morphological analysis aims at clarifying the histological classification and gives an indication of tumor risk of gonads in disorders of sex development.
There are some evidence to suggest that careful antenatal monitoring, scheduled preterm delivery and immediate abdominal wall closure may reduce gastroschisis morbidity. We hypothesised that the advantages of a scheduled preterm delivery balance possible complications related to prematurity. A retrospective study was performed including all cases of gastroschisis born between 1990 and 2004 (n = 69). Cases were categorised in two groups. Group 1 contained gastroschisis cases born between 1990 and 1997. Group 2 contained cases occurring since 1997, when a new management pathway for gastroschisis was established: weekly evaluation of the foetal gut by ultrasound (>28 weeks), corticosteroids, and delivery by scheduled caesarean section at 35 weeks (before if evidence of bowel compromise was present). The primary endpoints of this study were the initiation of oral feeding and the number of re-operation for intestinal obstruction. There was a significantly faster initiation of oral feeding (P < 0.0001), however, duration of parenteral nutrition (34 vs. 38 days) and hospital discharge (53 vs. 58.5 days) was not reduced. There was no complication due to prematurity in group 2. Postoperative outcome was improved with less need for muscular stretching or prosthetic patch and less re-operation for intestinal obstruction (P < 0.05). Scheduled and elective preterm delivery facilitates surgical procedure and shortens the time to first feeding. A delivery at 35 weeks (preferring vaginal delivery) seems to be a good compromise between risks related to prematurity and complications related to intestinal peel.
Context: MIRAGE (Myelodysplasia, Infection, Restriction of growth, Adrenal hypoplasia, Genital phenotypes, Enteropathy) syndrome is a severe multisystem disorder with high mortality. It is caused by a heterozygous gain of function mutation in the growth repressor gene SAMD9. The increasing number of reported cases displays a spectrum of phenotypes that may be explained by an adaptation mechanism, with appearance of a somatic second hit mutation with revertant effects.Objective: To determine the genetic basis of the MIRAGE syndrome rapidly corrected in a living and healthy 46,XY patient.Subjects and Methods: A 46,XY patient born with growth restriction and disorders of sex development had thrombocytopenia and necrotizing enterocolitis during the neonatal period suggestive of the syndrome. Faced with the rapid improvement of the patient's phenotype, an adaptation mechanism was sought by repeating genetic analysis at different ages; her parents also underwent genetic analysis.Results: The previously described p.(Thr778Ile) mutation was identified and surprisingly transmitted by the asymptomatic mother in this usually de novo syndrome. To explain the rapid improvement of the patient's phenotype and absence of symptoms in the mother, an adaptation mechanism was sought. For the mother, a non-sense mutation was found (p.(Arg221*)) in cis, and most likely appeared in utero. It was not transmitted to her child. The child harbored a different non-sense mutation (p.(Arg285*)) that most likely appeared near day 20.Conclusions: We show that pathogenic variants can be inherited from a healthy parent as the adaptation mechanism may arise early in life and mask symptoms. Presence of revertant mosaicism mutations could explain “incomplete penetrance” in other disease. For a better management and outcomes in patients, appearance of this natural gene therapy should be sought by repeating genetic analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.