The goal of this update regarding the diagnosis and care of persons with disorders of sex development (DSDs) is to address changes in the clinical approach since the 2005 Consensus Conference, since knowledge and viewpoints change. An effort was made to include representatives from a broad perspective including support and advocacy groups. The goal of patient care is focused upon the best possible quality of life (QoL). The field of DSD is continuously developing. An update on the clinical evaluation of infants and older individuals with ambiguous genitalia including perceptions regarding male or female assignment is discussed. Topics include biochemical and genetic assessment, the risk of germ cell tumor development, approaches to psychosocial and psychosexual well-being and an update on support groups. Open and on-going communication with patients and parents must involve full disclosure, with the recognition that, while DSD conditions are life-long, enhancement of the best possible outcome improves QoL. The evolution of diagnosis and care continues, while it is still impossible to predict gender development in an individual case with certainty. Such decisions and decisions regarding surgery during infancy that alters external genital anatomy or removes germ cells continue to carry risk.

The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.A DVANCES in understanding of genetic control of sexual determination and differentiation, improvements in diagnostic testing and surgical genital repair, and the persistent controversies inherent to clinical management were all compelling factors that led to the organization of an international consensus conference. The goals were to acknowledge and discuss the more controversial issues in intersex management, provide management guidelines for intersex patients, and identify and prioritize questions that need additional investigation. This is a summary statement. NOMENCLATURE AND DEFINITIONSAdvances in molecular genetic causes of abnormal sexual development and heightened awareness of the ethical and patient-advocacy issues mandate reexamination of existing nomenclature for patients with intersex. 1 Terminology such as "pseudohermaphroditism" is controversial, potentially pejorative to patients, 2 and inherently confusing. Therefore, the term "disorders of sex development" (DSD) is proposed to indicate congenital conditions with atypical development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex.Additional rationale for new classification is the need for modern categorization to integrate the modern molecular genetic aspects, to maximize precision when applying definitions and diagnostic labels, 3 and to meet the need for psychologically sensitive yet descriptive medical terminology. Nomenclature should be flexible enough to incorporate new information, robust enough to maintain a consistent framework, use descriptive terms, reflect genetic etiology, accommodate phenotypic variation spectrum, and be useful for clinicians, scientists, patients, and families. Hence, we propose a new classification (see "Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders" 4 in this month's issue of Pediatrics Electronic Edition).Three traditionally conceptualized domains of psychosexual development are gender identity (one's self-representation [ie, male or female]), gender role (sexually dimorphic behaviors within the general population, such as toy preferences, aggression, and spatial ability), and sexual orientation (direction[s] of erotic interest). Gender dissatisfaction denotes unhappiness with assigned sex and may www.pediatrics.org/cgi/

Ten years after the consensus meeting on disorders of sex development (DSD), genital surgery continues to raise questions and criticisms concerning its indications, its technical aspects, timing and evaluation. This standpoint details each distinct situation and its possible management in 5 main groups of DSD patients with atypical genitalia: the 46,XX DSD group (congenital adrenal hyperplasia); the heterogeneous 46,XY DSD group (gonadal dysgenesis, disorders of steroidogenesis, target tissues impairments …); gonosomic mosaicisms (45,X/46,XY patients); ovo-testicular DSD; and "non-hormonal/non chromosomal" DSD. Questions are summarized for each DSD group with the support of literature and the feed-back of several world experts. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of presentation there is no consensus regarding the indications, the timing, the procedure nor the evaluation of outcome of DSD surgery. There are, however, some issues on which most experts would agree: 1) The need for identifying centres of expertise with a multidisciplinary approach; 2) A conservative management of the gonads in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome at least until puberty although some studies expressed concerns about the heightened tumour risk in this group; 3) To avoid vaginal dilatation in children after surgical reconstruction; 4) To keep asymptomatic mullerian remnants during childhood; 5) To remove confirmed streak gonads when Y material is present; 6) It is likely that 46,XY cloacal exstrophy, aphallia and severe micropenis would do best raised as male although this is based on limited outcome data. There is general acknowledgement among experts that timing, the choice of the individual and irreversibility of surgical procedures are sources of concerns. There is, however, little evidence provided regarding the impact of non-treated DSD during childhood for the individual development, the parents, society and the risk of stigmatization. The low level of evidence should lead to design collaborative prospective studies involving all parties and using consensual protocols of evaluation.

No abstract