To describe the clinical characteristics, laboratory results, imaging findings, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to Brazilian hospitals. Methods: A cohort study of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized from March 2020 to September 2020 in 25 hospitals. Data were collected from medical records using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tools. A multivariate Poisson regression model was used to assess the risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Results: For a total of 2,054 patients (52.6% male; median age of 58 years), the in-hospital mortality was 22.0%; this rose to 47.6% for those treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Hypertension (52.9%), diabetes (29.2%), and obesity (17.2%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Overall, 32.5% required invasive mechanical ventilation, and 12.1% required kidney replacement therapy. Septic shock was observed in 15.0%, nosocomial infection in 13.1%, thromboembolism in 4.1%, and acute heart failure in 3.6%. Age >= 65 years, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, C-reactive protein ! 100 mg/dL, platelet count < 100 Â 10 9 /L, oxygen saturation < 90%, the need for supplemental oxygen, and invasive mechanical ventilation at admission were independently associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality. The overall use of antimicrobials was 87.9%. Conclusions: This study reveals the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 in Brazil. Certain easily assessed parameters at hospital admission were independently associated with a higher risk of death. The high frequency of antibiotic use points to an over-use of antimicrobials in COVID-19 patients.

Background Despite being an important cardiovascular risk factor, hypertension has low control levels worldwide. Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) might be effective in reducing blood pressure with a potential impact in reducing cardiovascular risk. Objective The goal of the research was to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and utility of a CDSS, TeleHAS (tele– hipertensão arterial sistêmica , or arterial hypertension system), in the care of patients with hypertension in the context of a primary care setting in a middle-income country. Methods The TeleHAS app consists of a platform integrating clinical and laboratory data on a particular patient, from which it performs cardiovascular risk calculation and provides evidence-based recommendations derived from Brazilian and international guidelines for the management of hypertension and cardiovascular risk. Ten family physicians from different primary care units in the city of Montes Claros, Brazil, were randomly selected to use the CDSS for the care of hypertensive patients for 6 months. After 3 and 6 months, the feasibility, usability, and utility of the CDSS in the routine care of the health team was evaluated through a standardized questionnaire and semistructured interviews. Results Throughout the study, clinicians registered 535 patients with hypertension, at an average of 1.24 consultations per patient. Women accounted for 80% (8/10) of participant doctors, median age was 31.5 years (interquartile range 27 to 59 years). As for feasibility, 100% of medical users claimed it was possible to use the app in the primary care setting, and for 80% (8/10) of them it was easy to incorporate its use into the daily routine and home visits. Nevertheless, 70% (7/10) of physicians claimed that the time taken to fill out the CDSS causes significant delays in service. Clinicians evaluated TeleHAS as good (8/10, 80% of users), with easy completion and friendly interface (10/10, 100%) and the potential to improve patients’ treatment (10/10, 100%). A total of 90% (9/10) of physicians had access to new knowledge about cardiovascular risk and hypertension through the app recommendations and found it useful to promote prevention and optimize treatment. Conclusions In this study, a CDSS developed to assist the management of patients with hypertension was feasible in the context of a primary health care setting in a middle-income country, with good user satisfaction and the potential to improve adherence to evidence-based practices.

Objectives The majority of available scores to assess mortality risk of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients in the emergency department have high risk of bias. Therefore, our aim was to develop and validate a score at hospital admission for predicting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients, and to compare this score with other existing ones. Methods Consecutive patients (≥18 years) with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the participating hospitals were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a prediction model for in-hospital mortality, based on the 3978 patients admitted between March-July, 2020. The model was validated in the 1054 patients admitted during August-September, as well as in an external cohort of 474 Spanish patients. Results Median (25th-75th percentile) age of the model-derivation cohort was 60 (48-72) years, and in-hospital mortality was 20.3%. The validation cohorts had similar age distribution and in-hospital mortality. Seven significant variables were included in the risk score: age, blood urea nitrogen, number of comorbidities, C-reactive protein, SpO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, platelet count and heart rate. The model had high discriminatory value (AUROC 0.844, 95% CI 0.829 to 0.859), which was confirmed in the Brazilian (0.859 [95% CI 0.833 to 0.885]) and Spanish (0.894 [95% CI 0.870 to 0.919]) validation cohorts, and displayed better discrimination ability than other existing scores. It is implemented in a freely available online risk calculator (https://abc2sph.com/). Conclusions We designed and validated an easy-to-use rapid scoring system based on characteristics of COVID-19 patients commonly available at hospital presentation, for early stratification for in-hospital mortality risk of patients with COVID-19.

O tabagismo é um dos principais responsáveis pela carga de doenças no mundo, causando uma a cada oito mortes. Conhecer os instrumentos que caracterizam o uso do tabaco é o primeiro passo para desenvolver pesquisas qualificadas e comparativas para enfrentar esse desafio. O objetivo foi identificar instrumentos e comparar domínios temáticos utilizados em pesquisas populacionais para avaliação do tabagismo nos últimos 5 anos. Foi realizada revisão sistemática em publicações de setembro de 2002 a setembro de 2007. Os termos utilizados foram: (Smok* or tobacco) AND (Questionnaire or scale or score or instrument or assessment or form) AND (*cultural* or translat* or valid* or reproduc* or psychomet*). Foram selecionados 186 artigos do total de 2236. Em apenas 91 havia citação dos instrumentos utilizados. Os principais temas foram perfil e prevalência (38%), dependência (24%) e motivação (10,8%). Questionários definidos foram empregados em 96% dos estudos de dependência. Já nas pesquisas de perfil e prevalência 79% utilizaram questionários próprios. A transparência e a padronização dos instrumentos e a preferência pelo uso de questionários validados são quesitos essenciais para a qualidade e reprodutibilidade das pesquisas sobre o tabagismo.

Objective: To develop and validate a rapid scoring system at hospital admission for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), and to compare this score with other existing ones. Design: Cohort study Setting: The Brazilian COVID-19 Registry has been conducted in 36 Brazilian hospitals in 17 cities. Logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a prediction model for in-hospital mortality, based on the 3978 patients that were admitted between March-July, 2020. The model was then validated in the 1054 patients admitted during August-September, as well as in an external cohort of 474 Spanish patients. Participants: Consecutive symptomatic patients (≥18 years old) with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 admitted to participating hospitals. Patients who were transferred between hospitals and in whom admission data from the first hospital or the last hospital were not available were excluded, as well those who were admitted for other reasons and developed COVID-19 symptoms during their stay. Main outcome measures: In-hospital mortality Results: Median (25th-75th percentile) age of the model-derivation cohort was 60 (48-72) years, 53.8% were men, in-hospital mortality was 20.3%. The validation cohorts had similar age distribution and in-hospital mortality. From 20 potential predictors, seven significant variables were included in the in-hospital mortality risk score: age, blood urea nitrogen, number of comorbidities, C-reactive protein, SpO2/FiO2 ratio, platelet count and heart rate. The model had high discriminatory value (AUROC 0.844, 95% CI 0.829 to 0.859), which was confirmed in the Brazilian (0.859) and Spanish (0.899) validation cohorts. Our ABC2-SPH score showed good calibration in both Brazilian cohorts, but, in the Spanish cohort, mortality was somewhat underestimated in patients with very high (>25%) risk. The ABC2-SPH score is implemented in a freely available online risk calculator (https://abc2sph.com/). Conclusions: We designed and validated an easy-to-use rapid scoring system based on characteristics of COVID-19 patients commonly available at hospital presentation, for early stratification for in-hospital mortality risk of patients with COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented pressure over health care systems worldwide. Hospital-level data that may influence the prognosis in COVID-19 patients still needs to be better investigated. Therefore, this study analyzed regional socioeconomic, hospital, and intensive care units (ICU) characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to Brazilian institutions. This multicenter retrospective cohort study is part of the Brazilian COVID-19 Registry. We enrolled patients ≥ 18 years old with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the participating hospitals from March to September 2020. Patients’ data were obtained through hospital records. Hospitals’ data were collected through forms filled in loco and through open national databases. Generalized linear mixed models with logit link function were used for pooling mortality and to assess the association between hospital characteristics and mortality estimates. We built two models, one tested general hospital characteristics while the other tested ICU characteristics. All analyses were adjusted for the proportion of high-risk patients at admission. Thirty-one hospitals were included. The mean number of beds was 320.4 ± 186.6. These hospitals had eligible 6556 COVID-19 admissions during the study period. Estimated in-hospital mortality ranged from 9.0 to 48.0%. The first model included all 31 hospitals and showed that a private source of funding ( β = − 0.37; 95% CI − 0.71 to − 0.04; p = 0.029) and location in areas with a high gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ( β = − 0.40; 95% CI − 0.72 to − 0.08; p = 0.014) were independently associated with a lower mortality. The second model included 23 hospitals and showed that hospitals with an ICU work shift composed of more than 50% of intensivists ( β = − 0.59; 95% CI − 0.98 to − 0.20; p = 0.003) had lower mortality while hospitals with a higher proportion of less experienced medical professionals had higher mortality ( β = 0.40; 95% CI 0.11–0.68; p = 0.006). The impact of those association increased according to the proportion of high-risk patients at admission. In-hospital mortality varied significantly among Brazilian hospitals. Private-funded hospitals and those located in municipalities with a high GDP had a lower mortality. When analyzing ICU-specific characteristics, hospitals with more experienced ICU teams had a reduced mortality. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-022-03092-9.

Background: Despite being an important cardiovascular risk factor, hypertension (HT) has low control levels worldwide. Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSS) might be effective in reducing blood pressure, with a potential impact in reducing cardiovascular risk. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and usability of a CDSS, named TeleHAS, in the care of patients with HT in the context of primary care setting in a middle income country, as well as the physician's satisfaction with its use. Methods: The TeleHAS application consists of a platform integrating clinical and laboratory data of a particular patient, from which it performs cardiovascular risk calculation and provides evidence-based recommendations derived from Brazilian and international guidelines for the management of HT and cardiovascular risk. Ten family physicians of different primary care units in Montes Claros city, Brazil, were randomly selected to use the application for the care of hypertensive patients for 6 months. After 3 months, the feasibility and usability of the CDSS in the routine care of the health teams was evaluated through standardized questionnaire and semistructured interviews. After 6 months, another questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were applied to test the satisfaction of the physicians with the application. Results: Throughout the study, clinicians registered 535 patients with HT, at an average of 1.24 consultations per patient. Women accounted for 80% of participant doctors, median age 31.5 years (interquartile range 27-59 years). As for feasibility, 100% of medical users claimed it is possible to use the application in the primary care setting and for 80% of them it is easy to incorporate its use in the daily routine and home visits. Nevertheless, 70% of physicians claimed that the time taken to fill out the CDSS causes significant delays in service. Clinicians evaluated the TeleHAS as good (80% of users), with easy filling blanks and friendly interface (100%) and with the potential to improve patients' treatment (100%). Ninety percent of physicians had access to new knowledge about cardiovascular risk and HT through the application recommendations and found it useful to promote prevention and optimize treatment. Conclusions: In this study, a CDSS developed to assist the management of patients with HT was applicable in the context of primary health care setting in a middle income country, with good user's satisfaction and potential to improve adherence to evidence-based practices.

Background Scientific data regarding the prevalence of COVID-19 neurological manifestations and prognosis in Latin America countries is still lacking. Therefore, the study aims to understand neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV 2 infection in the Brazilian population and its association with patient outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality. Methods This study is part of the Brazilian COVID-19 Registry, a multicentric COVID-19 cohort, including data from 37 Brazilian hospitals. For the analysis, patients were grouped according to the presence of self-reported vs. clinically-diagnosed neurological manifestations and matched with patients without neurological manifestations by age, sex, number of comorbidities, hospital, and whether or not patients ha neurological underlying disease. Results From 7,232 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, 27.8% presented self-reported neurological manifestations, 9.9% were diagnosed with a clinically-defined neurological syndrome and 1.2% did not show any neurological symptoms. In patients with self-reported symptoms, the most common ones were headache (19.3%), ageusia (10.4%) and anosmia (7.4%). Meanwhile, in the group with clinically-defined neurological syndromes, acute encephalopathy was the most common diagnosis (10.5%), followed by coma (0.6%1) and seizures (0.4%). Men and younger patients were more likely to self-report neurological symptoms, while women and older patients were more likely to develop a neurological syndrome. Patients with clinically-defined neurological syndromes presented a higher prevalence of comorbidities, as well as lower oxygen saturation and blood pressure at hospital admission. In the paired analysis, it was observed that patients with clinically-defined neurological syndromes were more likely to require ICU admission (46.9 vs. 37.9%), mechanical ventilation (33.4 vs. 28.2%), to develop acute heart failure (5.1 vs. 3.0%, p=0.037) and to die (40.7 vs. 32.3%, p<0.001) when compared to controls. Conclusion Neurological manifestations are an important cause of morbidity in COVID-19 patients. More specifically, patients with clinically defined neurological syndromes presented a poorer prognosis for the disease when compared to matched controls.