Assessing the true IOL position at the end of surgery is crucial for the evaluation of rotational stability of IOLs. No IOL rotation exceeding 5° could be detected 6 months after surgery.

PATIENT POPULATION: A total of 123 eyes of 80 patients prior to cataract surgery were assigned to 2 groups based on normal and dry eyes. INTERVENTION: Two native baseline keratometries were followed by instillation of either high-or low-viscosity eye drops. Keratometry was repeated 30 seconds, 2 minutes, and 5 minutes after instillation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Influence of eye drops of different viscosity in normal and dry eyes on short time K-readings.RESULTS: Repeatability between native baseline measurements was high (standard deviation [ 0.02 mm in normal and in dry eyes). In normal and dry eyes, a statistically significant increase in measurement variability after instillation of both low-viscosity and high-viscosity eye drops was observed (P < .01). Measurement variability was most pronounced between baseline measurement and 30 seconds and diminished over time. Variability of K-readings appeared higher in dry eyes compared with normal eyes. Astigmatism changed more than 0.5 diopters in 13.2% of normal eyes and 34.4% in dry eyes using eye drops of high viscosity.CONCLUSION: Tear film-stabilizing eye drops prior to keratometry measurements influenced K-readings significantly, especially in dry eyes. A time period of more than 5 minutes should be allowed to pass after instillation of eye drops. The higher the viscosity of the eye drops, the stronger the influence and the longer its persistence.

Purpose: To investigate interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and total prostaglandin (PG) levels in the anterior chamber in patients undergoing low pulse energy femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery. Methods: Forty patients undergoing immediate sequential cataract surgery received randomized low-energy femtosecond laser pretreatment in 1 eye and conventional phacoemulsification in the other. Aqueous humor was collected precisely 5 minutes after femtosecond laser pretreatment and before conventional phacoemulsification from all 80 eyes. IL-1β, IL-6, and total PG (including PGE1, PGE2; PGF1a, PGF2a) levels were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunoassay kits. One drop of ketorolac 0.5% was administered 30 minutes preoperatively. Results: Mean concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and total PG were 0.87, 0.67, and 32.19 pg/mL in the femto group compared with 0.10 (P = .36), 0.78 (P = .79), and 19.66 pg/mL (P < .05) in the nonfemto group. Levels of IL-1β and IL-6 were not statistically significantly different when compared between groups. There was a small but statistically significant increase of PG levels in the femto group. There were no statistically significant correlations between levels of 1β, IL-6, or total PG and suction time or lens density (P > .05). Conclusions: Low pulse energy femtosecond laser pretreatment did not trigger any additional IL and only a small but statistically significant increase of PG release in the anterior chamber after a single-dose of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug administered 30 minutes before the start of cataract surgery. The findings indicated that the minor inflammatory reaction was due to the lower pulse energy concept applied by the femtosecond laser.

To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymiumyttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between 2 similar open-loop single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that differ in the proprietary material characteristics and design features, over a period of 3 years.DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, patient-and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison.

AimsTo provide clinical guidance on the use of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas according to the biometric parameters.Methods611 eyes that underwent cataract surgery were retrospectively analysed in subgroups according to the axial length (AL) and corneal power (K). The predicted residual refractive error was calculated and compared to evaluate the accuracy of the following formulas: Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and SRK/T. Furthermore, the percentages of eyes with ≤±0.25, ≤±0.5 and 1 dioptres (D) of the prediction error were recorded.ResultsThe Haigis formula showed the highest percentage of cases with ≤0.5 D in eyes with a short AL and steep K (90%), average AL and steep cornea (73.2%) but also in long eyes with a flat and average K (65% and 72.7%, respectively). The Hoffer Q formula delivered the lowest median absolute error (MedAE) in short eyes with an average K (0.30 D) and Holladay 1 in short eyes with a steep K (Holladay 1 0.24 D). SRK/T presented the highest percentage of cases with ≤0.5 D in average long eyes with a flat and average K (80.5% and 68.1%, respectively) and the lowest MedAE in long eyes with an average K (0.29 D).ConclusionOverall, the Haigis formula shows accurate results in most subgroups. However, attention must be paid to the axial eye length as well as the corneal power when choosing the appropriate formula to calculate an IOL power, especially in eyes with an unusual biometry.