Purpose To evaluate the magnetic susceptibility properties of different anatomical structures within the knee joint using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Methods A collagen tissue model was simulated and ex vivo animal cartilage experiments were conducted at 9.4 T to evaluate the B0 orientation-dependent magnetic susceptibility contrast observed in cartilage. Furthermore, nine volunteers (six healthy subjects without knee pain history and three patients with known knee injury, age between 29 and 58 years) were scanned using gradient-echo acquisitions on a high-field (7 T) magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. Susceptibility values of different tissues were quantified and diseased cartilage and meniscus were compared against that of healthy volunteers. Results Simulation and ex vivo animal cartilage experiments demonstrated that collagen fibrils exhibit an anisotropic susceptibility. A gradual change of magnetic susceptibility was observed in the articular cartilage from the superficial zone to the deep zone, forming a multilayer ultra-structure consistent with anisotropy of collagen fibrils. Meniscal tears caused a clear reduction of susceptibility contrast between the injured meniscus and surrounding cartilage illustrated by a loss of the sharp boundaries between the two. Moreover, QSM showed more dramatic contrast in the focal degenerated articular cartilage than R2* mapping. Conclusion The arrangement of the collagen fibrils is a significant and likely the most dominant source of magnetic susceptibility anisotropy. QSM offers a means to characterize magnetic susceptibility properties of tissues in the knee joint. QSM is sensitive to collagen damage or degeneration and may be useful for evaluating the status of knee diseases, such as meniscal tears and cartilage disease.
US demonstrated to be a reliable and sensitive imaging modality at quantifying medial femoral cartilage deformation in healthy individuals. Both walking and running conditions created greater cartilage deformation when compared to the control conditions, but no difference was observed between the walking and running conditions.
Purpose Aberrant walking biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are hypothesized to be associated with deleterious changes in knee cartilage. T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive to decreased proteoglycan density of cartilage. Our purpose was to determine associations between T1ρ MRI interlimb ratios (ILR) and walking biomechanics 6 months after ACLR. Methods Walking biomechanics (peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), vGRF loading rate, knee extension moment, knee abduction moment) were extracted from the first 50% of stance phase in 29 individuals with unilateral ACLR. T1ρ MRI ILR (ACLR limb/uninjured limb) was calculated for regions of interest in both medial and lateral femoral (LFC) and medial and lateral tibial condyles. Separate, stepwise linear regressions were used to determine associations between biomechanical outcomes and T1ρ MRI ILR after accounting for walking speed and meniscal/chondral injury (P ≤ 0.05). Results Lesser peak vGRF in the ACLR limb was associated with greater T1ρ MRI ILR for the LFC (posterior ΔR 2 = 0.14, P = 0.05; central ΔR 2 = 0.15, P = 0.05) and medial femoral condyle (central ΔR 2 = 0.24, P = 0.01). Lesser peak vGRF loading rate in the ACLR limb (ΔR 2 = 0.21, P = 0.02) and the uninjured limb (ΔR 2 = 0.27, P = 0.01) was associated with greater T1ρ MRI ILR for the anterior LFC. Lesser knee abduction moment for the injured limb was associated with greater T1ρ MRI ILR for the anterior LFC (ΔR 2 = 0.16, P = 0.04) as well as the posterior medial tibial condyle (ΔR 2 = 0.13, P = 0.04). Conclusion Associations between outcomes related to lesser mechanical loading during walking and greater T1ρ MRI ILR were found 6 months after ACLR. Although preliminary, our results suggest that underloading of the ACLR limb at 6 months after ACLR may be associated with lesser proteoglycan density in the ACLR limb compared with the uninjured limb.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.