No abstract

Cold deacclimation and preparation to flushing likely requires rehydration of meristems. Therefore, water stress related genes, such as dehydrins (DHN), might play an important role in providing protection during winter dormancy, deacclimation and bud burst timing processes. Here we report the sequence analysis of several Norway spruce DHN identified in late and early flushing suppressive subtraction hybridization cDNA libraries and in our Norway spruce EST database. We obtained 15 cDNAs, representing eight genes from three distinct types of DHN, and studied differential expression of these genes before and during bud burst in spring, using qRT-PCR. We found the visible reduction in transcript level of most DHN towards the bud burst, supported by a significant down-regulation of the DHN in needles during experimental induction of bud burst applied at three time points during autumn in Norway spruce grafts. For most of the DHN transcripts, their expression levels in late-flushing spruces were significantly higher than in the early flushing ones at the same calendar dates but were remarkably similar at the same bud developmental stage. From our results we may conclude that the difference between the early and the late families is in timing of the molecular processes leading to bud burst due to differences in their response to the increasing temperature in the spring. They are induced much earlier in the early flushing families.

Juvenile trees of temperate and boreal regions cease growth and set buds in autumn in response to short daylengths (SD) detected by phytochrome. Growth cessation and bud set are prerequisites for the development of winter dormancy and full cold hardiness. In this study we show that the SD-requirement for bud set and cold hardening can be overcome in hybrid aspen ( Populus tremula L. ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ tremuloides Michx.) by low night temperature and inhibition of gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis. Bud set and increased cold hardiness were observed under normally non-inductive long day-length (LD) in wild-type plants, when exposed to low night temperature and paclobutrazol. In addition, the effect of PHYA overexpression could be overcome in transgenic plants, producing bud set and cold acclimation by treatment with: SD, low night temperature and paclobutrazol. After cold acclimation, the degree of bud dormancy was lower for wild-type plants prior treated with LD and transgenic plants (overexpressing PHYA ), than SD-treated, wild-type plants. Thus, low night temperature in combination with reduced GA content induced bud set and promoted cold hardiness under normally noninductive photoperiods in hybrid aspen, but was unable to affect development of dormancy. This might suggest separate signalling pathways from phytochrome regulating the induction of cold/cold hardiness and bud dormancy in hybrid aspen or alternatively, there might be one pathway that fails to complete its action in the transgenic and paclobutrazol treated plants.

The molecular basis for terminal bud formation in autumn is not well understood in conifers. By combining suppression subtractive hybridization and monitoring of gene expression by qRT-PCR analysis, we aimed to identify genes involved in photoperiodic control of growth cessation and bud set in Norway spruce. Close to 1400 ESTs were generated and their functional distribution differed between short day (SD-12 h photoperiod) and long day (LD-24 h photoperiod) libraries. Many genes with putative roles in protection against stress appeared differentially regulated under SD and LD, and also differed in transcript levels between 6 and 20 SDs. Of these, PaTFL1(TERMINAL FLOWER LIKE 1) showed strongly increased transcript levels at 6 SDs. PaCCCH(CCCH-TYPE ZINC FINGER) and PaCBF2& 3(C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR 2&3) showed a later response at 20 SDs, with increased and decreased transcript levels, respectively. For rhythmically expressed genes such as CBFs, such differences might represent a phase shift in peak expression, but might also suggest a putative role in response to SD. Multivariate analyses revealed strong differences in gene expression between LD, 6 SD and 20 SD. The robustness of the gene expression patterns was verified in 6 families differing in bud-set timing under natural light with gradually decreasing photoperiod.